These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30090388)
21. "Data fusion" quantitative read-across structure-activity-activity relationships (q-RASAARs) for the prediction of toxicities of binary and ternary antibiotic mixtures toward three bacterial species. Chatterjee M; Roy K J Hazard Mater; 2023 Oct; 459():132129. PubMed ID: 37506640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. First report on development of quantitative interspecies structure-carcinogenicity relationship models and exploring discriminatory features for rodent carcinogenicity of diverse organic chemicals using OECD guidelines. Kar S; Roy K Chemosphere; 2012 Apr; 87(4):339-55. PubMed ID: 22225702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. External validation of acute-to-chronic models for estimation of reproductive toxicity to Daphnia magna. Furuhama A; Hayashi TI; Yamamoto H; Tatarazako N SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 Sep; 28(9):765-781. PubMed ID: 29022371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development of QSAAR and QAAR models for predicting fish early-life stage toxicity with a focus on industrial chemicals. Furuhama A; Hayashi TI; Yamamoto H SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2019 Nov; 30(11):825-846. PubMed ID: 31607178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling. Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Development of QSAR models using artificial neural network analysis for risk assessment of repeated-dose, reproductive, and developmental toxicities of cosmetic ingredients. Hisaki T; Aiba Née Kaneko M; Yamaguchi M; Sasa H; Kouzuki H J Toxicol Sci; 2015 Apr; 40(2):163-80. PubMed ID: 25786522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A novel two-step hierarchical quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling work flow for predicting acute toxicity of chemicals in rodents. Zhu H; Ye L; Richard A; Golbraikh A; Wright FA; Rusyn I; Tropsha A Environ Health Perspect; 2009 Aug; 117(8):1257-64. PubMed ID: 19672406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Application of QSAR models for acute toxicity of tetrazole compounds administrated orally and intraperitoneally in rat and mouse. Liu Z; Gao J; Li C; Xu L; Lv X; Deng H; Gao Y; Wang H; Li H; Wang Z Toxicology; 2023 Dec; 500():153679. PubMed ID: 38042272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Validation of a QSAR model for acute toxicity. Pavan M; Netzeva TI; Worth AP SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2006 Apr; 17(2):147-71. PubMed ID: 16644555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predicting zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryo developmental toxicity through a non-conformational QSAR approach. Saavedra LM; Duchowicz PR Sci Total Environ; 2021 Nov; 796():148820. PubMed ID: 34328907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: I. QSAR estimation of the maximum recommended therapeutic dose (MRTD) and no effect level (NOEL) of organic chemicals based on clinical trial data. Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Benz RD; Contrera JF Curr Drug Discov Technol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):61-76. PubMed ID: 16472220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Chemometric QSAR modeling of acute oral toxicity of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) to rat using simple 2D descriptors and interspecies toxicity modeling with mouse. Sun G; Zhang Y; Pei L; Lou Y; Mu Y; Yun J; Li F; Wang Y; Hao Z; Xi S; Li C; Chen C; Zhao L; Zhang N; Zhong R; Peng Y Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2021 Oct; 222():112525. PubMed ID: 34274838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comprehensive model for reproductive and developmental toxicity hazard identification: II. Construction of QSAR models to predict activities of untested chemicals. Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Daniel Benz R; Ivanov J; Klopman G; Contrera JF Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Mar; 47(2):136-55. PubMed ID: 17175082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. QSAR modelling of inhalation toxicity of diverse volatile organic molecules using no observed adverse effect concentration (NOAEC) as the endpoint. Nath A; De P; Roy K Chemosphere; 2022 Jan; 287(Pt 1):131954. PubMed ID: 34478968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. QSAR model as a random event: A case of rat toxicity. Toropova AP; Toropov AA; Benfenati E; Leszczynska D; Leszczynski J Bioorg Med Chem; 2015 Mar; 23(6):1223-30. PubMed ID: 25703247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Integration of read-across and artificial neural network-based QSAR models for predicting systemic toxicity: A case study for valproic acid. Hisaki T; Kaneko MAN; Hirota M; Matsuoka M; Kouzuki H J Toxicol Sci; 2020; 45(2):95-108. PubMed ID: 32062621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship for acute oral toxicity of pesticides on rats: Validation, domain of application and prediction. Hamadache M; Benkortbi O; Hanini S; Amrane A; Khaouane L; Si Moussa C J Hazard Mater; 2016 Feb; 303():28-40. PubMed ID: 26513561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals I. Alternative toxicity measures as an estimator of carcinogenic potency. Venkatapathy R; Wang CY; Bruce RM; Moudgal C Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Jan; 234(2):209-21. PubMed ID: 18977375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In Silico Study of In Vitro GPCR Assays by QSAR Modeling. Mansouri K; Judson RS Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1425():361-81. PubMed ID: 27311474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]