These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30091187)

  • 1. Hospital readmission rates are similar between patients with mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valves.
    Kilic A; Bianco V; Gleason TG; Aranda-Michel E; Chu D; Navid F; Althouse AD; Sultan I
    J Card Surg; 2018 Sep; 33(9):497-505. PubMed ID: 30091187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Results of bioprosthetic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement performed with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Akins CW; Hilgenberg AD; Vlahakes GJ; MacGillivray TE; Torchiana DF; Madsen JC
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2002 Oct; 74(4):1098-106. PubMed ID: 12400752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 50 Years and Younger.
    Hirji SA; Kolkailah AA; Ramirez-Del Val F; Lee J; McGurk S; Pelletier M; Singh S; Mallidi HR; Aranki S; Shekar P; Kaneko T
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2018 Oct; 106(4):1113-1120. PubMed ID: 29966596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contemporary trends and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical and bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement in the United States.
    Hiltner E; Erinne I; Singh A; Chen C; Kassotis J; Russo M; Sethi A
    J Card Surg; 2022 Jul; 37(7):1980-1988. PubMed ID: 35419890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Valve type and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement in older patients.
    Schelbert EB; Vaughan-Sarrazin MS; Welke KF; Rosenthal GE
    Heart; 2008 Sep; 94(9):1181-8. PubMed ID: 18070945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical Enlargement of the Aortic Root Does Not Increase the Operative Risk of Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Rocha RV; Manlhiot C; Feindel CM; Yau TM; Mueller B; David TE; Ouzounian M
    Circulation; 2018 Apr; 137(15):1585-1594. PubMed ID: 29167226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
    Chiang YP; Chikwe J; Moskowitz AJ; Itagaki S; Adams DH; Egorova NN
    JAMA; 2014 Oct; 312(13):1323-9. PubMed ID: 25268439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements.
    Isaacs AJ; Shuhaiber J; Salemi A; Isom OW; Sedrakyan A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 May; 149(5):1262-9.e3. PubMed ID: 25791947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
    Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Severe Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Stenosis Undergoing Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Naji P; Griffin BP; Sabik JF; Kusunose K; Asfahan F; Popovic ZB; Rodriguez LL; Lytle BW; Grimm RA; Svensson LG; Desai MY
    Circulation; 2015 Nov; 132(21):1953-60. PubMed ID: 26358259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves.
    Dvir D; Webb JG; Bleiziffer S; Pasic M; Waksman R; Kodali S; Barbanti M; Latib A; Schaefer U; Rodés-Cabau J; Treede H; Piazza N; Hildick-Smith D; Himbert D; Walther T; Hengstenberg C; Nissen H; Bekeredjian R; Presbitero P; Ferrari E; Segev A; de Weger A; Windecker S; Moat NE; Napodano M; Wilbring M; Cerillo AG; Brecker S; Tchetche D; Lefèvre T; De Marco F; Fiorina C; Petronio AS; Teles RC; Testa L; Laborde JC; Leon MB; Kornowski R;
    JAMA; 2014 Jul; 312(2):162-70. PubMed ID: 25005653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical management of aortic valve disease in the elderly: A retrospective comparative study of valve choice using propensity score analysis.
    Accola KD; Scott ML; Palmer GJ; Thompson PA; Sand ME; Suarez-Cavalier JE; Bott JN; Ebra G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):355-64; discussion 365. PubMed ID: 18751463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early mortality after aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthetic vs bioprosthetic valves among Medicare beneficiaries: a population-based cohort study.
    Du DT; McKean S; Kelman JA; Laschinger J; Johnson C; Warnock R; Worrall CM; Sedrakyan A; Encinosa W; MaCurdy TE; Izurieta HS
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Nov; 174(11):1788-95. PubMed ID: 25221895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: Revisiting prosthesis choice in patients younger than 50 years old.
    Schnittman SR; Adams DH; Itagaki S; Toyoda N; Egorova NN; Chikwe J
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Feb; 155(2):539-547.e9. PubMed ID: 29110948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
    Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity-matched analysis.
    McClure RS; McGurk S; Cevasco M; Maloney A; Gosev I; Wiegerinck EM; Salvio G; Tokmaji G; Borstlap W; Nauta F; Cohn LH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1931-9. PubMed ID: 24521965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemodynamic performance of Trifecta: single-center experience of 400 patients.
    Modi A; Budra M; Miskolczi S; Velissaris T; Kaarne M; Barlow CW; Livesey SA; Ohri SK; Tsang GM
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2015 Feb; 23(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 24823382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term follow-up after aortic valve replacement with Edwards Prima Plus stentless bioprostheses in patients younger than 60 years of age.
    Christ T; Grubitzsch H; Claus B; Konertz W
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):264-9. PubMed ID: 23158257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Allografts for aortic valve or root replacement: insights from an 18-year single-center prospective follow-up study.
    Takkenberg JJ; Klieverik LM; Bekkers JA; Kappetein AP; Roos JW; Eijkemans MJ; Bogers AJ
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 May; 31(5):851-9. PubMed ID: 17350857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early and intermediate outcome after aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: Results of a multicenter study.
    Rubino AS; Santarpino G; De Praetere H; Kasama K; Dalén M; Sartipy U; Lahtinen J; Heikkinen J; Deste W; Pollari F; Svenarud P; Meuris B; Fischlein T; Mignosa C; Biancari F
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Sep; 148(3):865-71; discussion 871. PubMed ID: 24954175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.