These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30091636)

  • 1. Mapping the dynamic allocation of temporal attention in musical patterns.
    Hurley BK; Fink LK; Janata P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1694-1711. PubMed ID: 30091636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spontaneous sensorimotor coupling with multipart music.
    Hurley BK; Martens PA; Janata P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1679-96. PubMed ID: 24979362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A linear oscillator model predicts dynamic temporal attention and pupillary entrainment to rhythmic patterns.
    Fink LK; Hurley BK; Geng JJ; Janata P
    J Eye Mov Res; 2018 Nov; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33828695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Musical Meter Modulates the Allocation of Attention across Time.
    Fitzroy AB; Sanders LD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 27(12):2339-51. PubMed ID: 26284995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disentangling beat perception from sequential learning and examining the influence of attention and musical abilities on ERP responses to rhythm.
    Bouwer FL; Werner CM; Knetemann M; Honing H
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 May; 85():80-90. PubMed ID: 26972966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The importance of integration and top-down salience when listening to complex multi-part musical stimuli.
    Uhlig M; Fairhurst MT; Keller PE
    Neuroimage; 2013 Aug; 77():52-61. PubMed ID: 23558103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Entrainment to an auditory signal: Is attention involved?
    Kunert R; Jongman SR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jan; 146(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 28054814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.
    Tervaniemi M; Kruck S; De Baene W; Schröger E; Alter K; Friederici AD
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 30(8):1636-42. PubMed ID: 19821835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pupillary response indexes the metrical hierarchy of unattended rhythmic violations.
    Damsma A; van Rijn H
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Feb; 111():95-103. PubMed ID: 27816784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rhythm implicitly affects temporal orienting of attention across modalities.
    Bolger D; Trost W; Schön D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Feb; 142(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 23357092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Generality and specificity in the effects of musical expertise on perception and cognition.
    Carey D; Rosen S; Krishnan S; Pearce MT; Shepherd A; Aydelott J; Dick F
    Cognition; 2015 Apr; 137():81-105. PubMed ID: 25618010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O; Delpierre A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audiovisual synchrony perception for speech and music assessed using a temporal order judgment task.
    Vatakis A; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 393(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 16213656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Capturing the musical brain with Lasso: Dynamic decoding of musical features from fMRI data.
    Toiviainen P; Alluri V; Brattico E; Wallentin M; Vuust P
    Neuroimage; 2014 Mar; 88():170-80. PubMed ID: 24269803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From Vivaldi to Beatles and back: predicting lateralized brain responses to music.
    Alluri V; Toiviainen P; Lund TE; Wallentin M; Vuust P; Nandi AK; Ristaniemi T; Brattico E
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():627-36. PubMed ID: 23810975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expectation, information processing, and subjective duration.
    Simchy-Gross R; Margulis EH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):275-291. PubMed ID: 29090370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time course of the influence of musical expertise on the processing of vocal and musical sounds.
    Rigoulot S; Pell MD; Armony JL
    Neuroscience; 2015 Apr; 290():175-84. PubMed ID: 25637804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cortical processing of musical sounds in children with Cochlear Implants.
    Torppa R; Salo E; Makkonen T; Loimo H; Pykäläinen J; Lipsanen J; Faulkner A; Huotilainen M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Oct; 123(10):1966-79. PubMed ID: 22554786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From fragments to the whole: a comparison between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners in music perception and enjoyment.
    Alexander AJ; Bartel L; Friesen L; Shipp D; Chen J
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 21303594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Music training enhances the rapid plasticity of P3a/P3b event-related brain potentials for unattended and attended target sounds.
    Seppänen M; Pesonen AK; Tervaniemi M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Apr; 74(3):600-12. PubMed ID: 22222306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.