These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30093123)
1. Obtaining reliable intraoral digital scans for an implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis: A dental technique. Iturrate M; Minguez R; Pradies G; Solaberrieta E J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):237-241. PubMed ID: 30093123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study. Papaspyridakos P; Benic GI; Hogsett VL; White GS; Lal K; Gallucci GO Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jun; 23(6):676-681. PubMed ID: 21631595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study. Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fabrication of an implant-supported fixed complete denture using multiple digital technologies for a patient with a perioral burn: A clinical report. Ovchinnik V; Karatas B; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy EA J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):161-167. PubMed ID: 29551383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis, using an auxiliary geometry part-An in vitro study. Iturrate M; Eguiraun H; Solaberrieta E Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1250-1258. PubMed ID: 31610069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of simulated intraoral variables on the accuracy of a photogrammetric imaging technique for complete-arch implant prostheses. Bratos M; Bergin JM; Rubenstein JE; Sorensen JA J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):232-241. PubMed ID: 29559220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complete digital workflow for prosthesis prototype fabrication with double digital scanning: A retrospective study with 45 edentulous jaws. Papaspyridakos P; Vazouras K; Gotsis S; Bokhary A; Sicilia E; Kudara Y; Bedrossian A; Chochlidakis K J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):571-578. PubMed ID: 36527731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Technique for Digital Impression and Bite Registration for a Single Edentulous Arch. Fang Y; Fang JH; Jeong SM; Choi BH J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e519-e523. PubMed ID: 29522269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-arch digital removable complete denture: A workflow that starts from the intraoral scan. Lo Russo L; Salamini A J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):20-24. PubMed ID: 29195814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D-printed custom trays with a Gothic arch for centric relation recording and definitive impression making for complete dentures: A dental technique. Qu F; Du X; Liu WC J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 30006221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Precision and Accuracy of a Digital Impression Scanner in Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation. Pesce P; Pera F; Setti P; Menini M Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(2):171-175. PubMed ID: 29518813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using Intraoral Scanning to Fabricate Complete Dentures: First Experiences. Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(2):166-170. PubMed ID: 29518812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital verification and correction of digital intraoral scans for fixed implant rehabilitation of edentulous arches: A dental technique. Negreiros WM; Chanting Sun T; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):395-399. PubMed ID: 34229898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of digital fabrication options on the accuracy of dental implant-based single units and complete-arch frameworks. Abdel-Azim T; Zandinejad A; Elathamna E; Lin W; Morton D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1281-8. PubMed ID: 25265121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of intraoral digital scanning for a CAD/CAM-fabricated milled bar and superstructure framework for an implant-supported, removable complete dental prosthesis. Lin WS; Chou JC; Metz MJ; Harris BT; Morton D J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):509-15. PubMed ID: 25862270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A digital technique for fabricating an interim implant-supported fixed prosthesis immediately after implant placement in patients with complete edentulism. Oh JH; An X; Jeong SM; Choi BH J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 29961624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital workflow for the design and additively manufacture of a splinted framework and custom tray for the impression of multiple implants: A dental technique. Piedra Cascón W; Revilla-León M J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):805-811. PubMed ID: 30067479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of verification jig on framework fit for nonsegmented fixed implant-supported complete denture. Ercoli C; Geminiani A; Feng C; Lee H Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e188-95. PubMed ID: 22176765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ratios of Cantilever Lengths and Anterior-Posterior Spreads of Definitive Hybrid Full-Arch, Screw-Retained Prostheses: Results of a Clinical Study. Drago C J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):402-408. PubMed ID: 27416302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital impression and jaw relation record for the fabrication of CAD/CAM custom tray. Kanazawa M; Iwaki M; Arakida T; Minakuchi S J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Oct; 62(4):509-513. PubMed ID: 29555174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]