185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30094311)
1. Imaging and cancer of the cervix in low- and middle-income countries.
Olpin J; Chuang L; Berek J; Gaffney D
Gynecol Oncol Rep; 2018 Aug; 25():115-121. PubMed ID: 30094311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical cancer staging, pretreatment planning, and surgical treatment in the Nordic countries-Survey from the Surgical Subcommittee of the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology.
Fuglsang K; Haldorsen IS; Avall-Lundqvist E; Lindahl G; Roed H; Woie K; Pakarinen P; Thoroddsen A; Anttila M; Blaakaer J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Oct; 97(10):1178-1184. PubMed ID: 29799176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The changes in FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri.
Sehnal B; Sláma J; Kmoníčková E; Dubová O; Zikán M
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(3):216-221. PubMed ID: 31324113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imaging and Staging of Cervical Cancer.
Devine C; Viswanathan C; Faria S; Marcal L; Sagebiel TL
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2019 Aug; 40(4):280-286. PubMed ID: 31375168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR Imaging of Cervical Cancer.
Patel-Lippmann K; Robbins JB; Barroilhet L; Anderson B; Sadowski EA; Boyum J
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2017 Aug; 25(3):635-649. PubMed ID: 28668164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. American Brachytherapy Society: Brachytherapy treatment recommendations for locally advanced cervix cancer for low-income and middle-income countries.
Suneja G; Brown D; Chang A; Erickson B; Fidarova E; Grover S; Mahantshetty U; Nag S; Narayan K; Bvochora-Nsingo M; Viegas C; Viswanathan AN; Lin MY; Gaffney D
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 27919654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of ultrasound in primary workup of cervical cancer staging (ESGO, ESTRO, ESP cervical cancer guidelines).
Fischerová D; Cibula D
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 31213057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of scaled up human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical screening and the potential for global elimination of cervical cancer in 181 countries, 2020-99: a modelling study.
Simms KT; Steinberg J; Caruana M; Smith MA; Lew JB; Soerjomataram I; Castle PE; Bray F; Canfell K
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Mar; 20(3):394-407. PubMed ID: 30795950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The revised FIGO staging system for uterine malignancies: implications for MR imaging.
Freeman SJ; Aly AM; Kataoka MY; Addley HC; Reinhold C; Sala E
Radiographics; 2012 Oct; 32(6):1805-27. PubMed ID: 23065170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines.
Wright JD; Matsuo K; Huang Y; Tergas AI; Hou JY; Khoury-Collado F; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 134(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 31188324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging of endometrial carcinoma.
Peungjesada S; Bhosale PR; Balachandran A; Iyer RB
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(4):601-8. PubMed ID: 19638859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lacunae in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification for cervical carcinoma: observational study using TNM classification as comparator.
Meva J; Chaudhary RK; Bhaduri D; Bhatia M; Hatti S; Ba R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1071-7. PubMed ID: 23792602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. History of the FIGO cancer staging system.
Odicino F; Pecorelli S; Zigliani L; Creasman WT
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 May; 101(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 18199437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of Parametrial Response by Growth Pattern in Patients With International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IIB and IIIB Cervical Cancer: Analysis of Patients From a Prospective, Multicenter Trial (EMBRACE).
Yoshida K; Jastaniyah N; Sturdza A; Lindegaard J; Segedin B; Mahantshetty U; Rai B; Jürgenliemk-Schulz I; Haie-Meder C; Sasaki R; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Nov; 93(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 26530747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of FIGO 1989 and 2009 recommendations on staging of endometrial carcinoma: pathologic analysis and cervical status in 123 consecutive cases.
Korczynski J; Jesionek-Kupnicka D; Gottwald L; Piekarski J
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2011 Jul; 30(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 21623209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MRI and PET scans for primary staging and detection of cervical cancer recurrence.
Liyanage SH; Roberts CA; Rockall AG
Womens Health (Lond); 2010 Mar; 6(2):251-67; quiz 268-9. PubMed ID: 20187730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 2018 FIGO Staging System for Uterine Cervical Cancer: Enter Cross-sectional Imaging.
Lee SI; Atri M
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 31135294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MRI of cervical cancer with a surgical perspective: staging, prognostic implications and pitfalls.
Balcacer P; Shergill A; Litkouhi B
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2557-2571. PubMed ID: 30903231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging and Staging of Endometrial Cancer.
Faria SC; Devine CE; Rao B; Sagebiel T; Bhosale P
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2019 Aug; 40(4):287-294. PubMed ID: 31375169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical Cancer: 2018 Revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging System and the Role of Imaging.
Saleh M; Virarkar M; Javadi S; Elsherif SB; de Castro Faria S; Bhosale P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 May; 214(5):1182-1195. PubMed ID: 32182097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
