232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30094484)
1. Breast Cancers of Special Histologic Subtypes Are Biologically Diverse.
Tadros AB; Wen HY; Morrow M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 25(11):3158-3164. PubMed ID: 30094484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Does Not Predict Tumor Biology.
Bello DM; Russell C; McCullough D; Tierno M; Morrow M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 25(10):2884-2889. PubMed ID: 29968028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oncotype DX in Bilateral Synchronous Primary Invasive Breast Cancer.
Karsten M; Stempel M; Radosa J; Patil S; King TA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):471-6. PubMed ID: 26340863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship of histologic grade and histologic subtype with oncotype Dx recurrence score; retrospective review of 863 breast cancer oncotype Dx results.
Singh K; He X; Kalife ET; Ehdaivand S; Wang Y; Sung CJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Feb; 168(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 29230662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) of prognostic value once HER2-positive and. low-ER expression patients are removed?
Milburn M; Rosman M; Mylander C; Tafra L
Breast J; 2013; 19(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 23701403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of 21-Gene Breast Cancer Assay on Treatment Decision for Patients with T1-T3, N0-N1, Estrogen Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer: Final Results of the Prospective Multicenter ROXANE Study.
Dieci MV; Guarneri V; Zustovich F; Mion M; Morandi P; Bria E; Merlini L; Bullian P; Oliani C; Gori S; Giarratano T; Orvieto E; Griguolo G; Michieletto S; Saibene T; Del Bianco P; De Salvo GL; Conte P;
Oncologist; 2019 Nov; 24(11):1424-1431. PubMed ID: 31152079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are we Overtreating Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy? Role of OncotypeDx
Kantor O; Barrera E; Kopkash K; Pesce C; Barrera E; Winchester DJ; Yao K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):3232-3239. PubMed ID: 31342379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 21-Gene Recurrence Score and Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decision for Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Lymph Nodes.
Tong Y; Wu J; Huang O; He J; Zhu L; Chen W; Li Y; Chen X; Shen K
Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13123. PubMed ID: 31511599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Analysis of Oncotype DX Recurrence Scores and Clinicopathologic Characteristics in Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer.
Felts JL; Zhu J; Han B; Smith SJ; Truica CI
Breast J; 2017 Nov; 23(6):677-686. PubMed ID: 28097781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in Response and Surgical Management with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Invasive Lobular Versus Ductal Breast Cancer.
Truin W; Vugts G; Roumen RM; Maaskant-Braat AJ; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; van der Heiden-van der Loo M; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Voogd AC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 25980321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Epigenomic and Transcriptomic Characterization of Secondary Breast Cancers.
Graff-Baker AN; Orozco JIJ; Marzese DM; Salomon MP; Hoon DSB; Goldfarb M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 25(10):3082-3087. PubMed ID: 29956094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hormone receptor status does not affect prognosis in metaplastic breast cancer: a population-based analysis with comparison to infiltrating ductal and lobular carcinomas.
Paul Wright G; Davis AT; Koehler TJ; Melnik MK; Chung MH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(11):3497-503. PubMed ID: 24838367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma.
Jung NY; Kim SH; Choi BB; Kim SH; Sung MS
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 13():113. PubMed ID: 25889560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility of Oncotype DX Risk Assessment in Patients With Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.
Tsai ML; Lillemoe TJ; Finkelstein MJ; Money JE; Susnik B; Grimm E; Kang SH; Swenson KK
Clin Breast Cancer; 2016 Feb; 16(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 26385397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes in patients with early-stage breast cancer who underwent a 21-gene expression assay.
Barcenas CH; Raghavendra A; Sinha AK; Syed MP; Hsu L; Patangan MG; Chavez-MacGregor M; Shen Y; Hortobagyi GH; Valero V; Giordano SH; Ueno NT; Tripathy D
Cancer; 2017 Jul; 123(13):2422-2431. PubMed ID: 28199747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Prognostic Significance of the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in T
Wang M; Wu K; Zhang P; Zhang M; Ding A; Chen H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 26(5):1227-1235. PubMed ID: 30456680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Targetable ERBB2 mutation status is an independent marker of adverse prognosis in estrogen receptor positive, ERBB2 non-amplified primary lobular breast carcinoma: a retrospective in silico analysis of public datasets.
Kurozumi S; Alsaleem M; Monteiro CJ; Bhardwaj K; Joosten SEP; Fujii T; Shirabe K; Green AR; Ellis IO; Rakha EA; Mongan NP; Heery DM; Zwart W; Oesterreich S; Johnston SJ
Breast Cancer Res; 2020 Aug; 22(1):85. PubMed ID: 32782013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The 21-gene recurrence score in special histologic subtypes of breast cancer with favorable prognosis.
Turashvili G; Brogi E; Morrow M; Hudis C; Dickler M; Norton L; Wen HY
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 165(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 28577081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic Significance of Progesterone Receptor Expression in Estrogen-Receptor Positive, HER2-Negative, Node-Negative Invasive Breast Cancer With a Low Ki-67 Labeling Index.
Ono M; Tsuda H; Yoshida M; Shimizu C; Kinoshita T; Tamura K
Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Feb; 17(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 27477822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score on outcome in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.
Kizy S; Huang JL; Marmor S; Tuttle TM; Hui JYC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Oct; 165(3):757-763. PubMed ID: 28647915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
