These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30094770)

  • 1. A Stochastic Model for Reproductive Isolation Under Asymmetrical Mating Preferences.
    Leman H
    Bull Math Biol; 2018 Sep; 80(9):2502-2525. PubMed ID: 30094770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A stochastic model for speciation by mating preferences.
    Coron C; Costa M; Leman H; Smadi C
    J Math Biol; 2018 May; 76(6):1421-1463. PubMed ID: 28914350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coevolution of male and female mate choice can destabilize reproductive isolation.
    Aubier TG; Kokko H; Joron M
    Nat Commun; 2019 Nov; 10(1):5122. PubMed ID: 31719522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does divergent selection predict the evolution of mate preference and reproductive isolation in the tropical butterfly genus Melinaea (Nymphalidae: Ithomiini)?
    McClure M; Mahrouche L; Houssin C; Monllor M; Le Poul Y; Frérot B; Furtos A; Elias M
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Jun; 88(6):940-952. PubMed ID: 30873614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Roles of Sexual and Viability Selection in the Evolution of Incomplete Reproductive Isolation: From Allopatry to Sympatry.
    Cotto O; Servedio MR
    Am Nat; 2017 Nov; 190(5):680-693. PubMed ID: 29053357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of sexual selection on trait divergence in a peripheral population with gene flow.
    Servedio MR; Bürger R
    Evolution; 2015 Oct; 69(10):2648-61. PubMed ID: 26332694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolutionarily stable mating decisions for sequentially searching females and the stability of reproductive isolation by assortative mating.
    Priklopil T; Kisdi E; Gyllenberg M
    Evolution; 2015 Apr; 69(4):1015-26. PubMed ID: 25662095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The counterintuitive role of sexual selection in species maintenance and speciation.
    Servedio MR; Bürger R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jun; 111(22):8113-8. PubMed ID: 24821767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproductive isolation with a learned trait in a structured population.
    Yeh DJ; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2015 Jul; 69(7):1938-47. PubMed ID: 26031568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive, but not condition-dependent, body shape differences contribute to assortative mating preferences during ecological speciation.
    Greenway R; Drexler S; Arias-Rodriguez L; Tobler M
    Evolution; 2016 Dec; 70(12):2809-2822. PubMed ID: 27718237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assortative mating and persistent reproductive isolation in hybrids.
    Schumer M; Powell DL; Delclós PJ; Squire M; Cui R; Andolfatto P; Rosenthal GG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Oct; 114(41):10936-10941. PubMed ID: 28973863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Looking for the right mate in diploid species: How does genetic dominance affect the spatial differentiation of a sexual trait?
    Smadi C; Leman H; Llaurens V
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():154-170. PubMed ID: 29577932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental evolution: Assortative mating and sexual selection, independent of local adaptation, lead to reproductive isolation in the nematode Caenorhabditis remanei.
    Castillo DM; Burger MK; Lively CM; Delph LF
    Evolution; 2015 Dec; 69(12):3141-55. PubMed ID: 26542312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prezygotic isolation, mating preferences, and the evolution of chromosomal inversions.
    Dagilis AJ; Kirkpatrick M
    Evolution; 2016 Jul; 70(7):1465-72. PubMed ID: 27174252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contributions of natural and sexual selection to the evolution of premating reproductive isolation: a research agenda.
    Safran RJ; Scordato ES; Symes LB; Rodríguez RL; Mendelson TC
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2013 Nov; 28(11):643-50. PubMed ID: 24054911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Difference in diel mating time contributes to assortative mating between host plant-associated populations of Chilo suppressalis.
    Quan WL; Liu W; Zhou RQ; Chen R; Ma WH; Lei CL; Wang XP
    Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7():45265. PubMed ID: 28338099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual imprinting and speciation between two Peromyscus species.
    Delaney EK; Hoekstra HE
    Evolution; 2018 Feb; 72(2):274-287. PubMed ID: 29231989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pervasive reinforcement and the role of sexual selection in biological speciation.
    Hudson EJ; Price TD
    J Hered; 2014; 105 Suppl 1():821-33. PubMed ID: 25149257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissecting selection on female mating preferences during secondary contact.
    Proulx SR; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2009 Aug; 63(8):2031-46. PubMed ID: 19473397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The search for causal traits of speciation: Divergent female mate preferences target male courtship song, not pheromones, in Drosophila athabasca species complex.
    Yukilevich R; Harvey T; Nguyen S; Kehlbeck J; Park A
    Evolution; 2016 Mar; 70(3):526-42. PubMed ID: 26831347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.