These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30095474)

  • 1. Multiple-Level Lumbar Total Disk Replacement: A Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Analysis of Motion Preservation at 24-72 Months.
    Rasouli A; Cuellar JM; Kanim L; Delamarter R
    Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Feb; 32(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 30095474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single and Multilevel Lumbar Total Disc Replacement Adjacent to L5-S1 ALIF (Lumbar Hybrid): 6 Years of Follow-up.
    Cuellar JM; Rasouli A; Lanman TH; Kanim L; Delamarter R
    Int J Spine Surg; 2021 Oct; 15(5):971-977. PubMed ID: 34625452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Motion preservation following total lumbar disc replacement at the lumbosacral junction: a prospective long-term clinical and radiographic investigation.
    Wuertinger C; Annes RDÀ; Hitzl W; Siepe CJ
    Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 28673830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of a mismatched center of rotation on the clinical outcomes and flexion-extension range of motion: lumbar total disk replacement using mobidisc at a 5.5-year follow-up.
    Lee CS; Lee DH; Hwang CJ; Kim H; Noh H
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 May; 27(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 22525508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Results of Activ L Total Disk Replacement at 1- to 3-Year Follow-up.
    Lu S; Kong C; Hai Y; Kang N; Zang L; Wang Y; Yuan Y
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Nov; 28(9):E544-50. PubMed ID: 25532603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels.
    Auerbach JD; Jones KJ; Milby AH; Anakwenze OA; Balderston RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 19927100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up.
    Siepe CJ; Heider F; Wiechert K; Hitzl W; Ishak B; Mayer MH
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
    Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postoperative posterior lumbar muscle changes and their relationship to segmental motion preservation or restriction: a randomized prospective study.
    Strube P; Putzier M; Streitparth F; Hoff EK; Hartwig T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 26360146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interdependence between disc space height, range of motion and clinical outcome in total lumbar disc replacement.
    Siepe CJ; Hitzl W; Meschede P; Sharma AK; Khattab MF; Mayer MH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):904-16. PubMed ID: 19531999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors influencing segmental range of motion after lumbar total disc replacement using the ProDisc II prosthesis.
    Kim DH; Ryu KS; Kim MK; Park CK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Aug; 7(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 17688051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lumbar total disc replacement from an extreme lateral approach: clinical experience with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up.
    Pimenta L; Oliveira L; Schaffa T; Coutinho E; Marchi L
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jan; 14(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 21166491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels.
    Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Heinz-Leisenheimer M; Korge A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):782-90. PubMed ID: 17414914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of the Type of Sagittal Profile on Clinical Results of Lumbar Total Disk Replacement After a Mean Follow-Up of 39 Months.
    Strube P; Hoff EK; Perka CF; Gross C; Putzier M
    Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Aug; 29(7):291-9. PubMed ID: 23222097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Five-year follow-up of clinical and radiological outcomes of LP-ESP elastomeric lumbar total disc replacement in active patients.
    Lazennec JY; Rakover JP; Rousseau MA
    Spine J; 2019 Feb; 19(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 29800708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
    Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term clinical results following Charite III lumbar total disc replacement.
    Lu S; Sun S; Kong C; Sun W; Hu H; Wang Q; Hai Y
    Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):917-925. PubMed ID: 28870839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Holsapple G; Adams K; Blumenthal S; Guyer RD; Dmietriev A; Maxwell JH; Regan JJ; Isaza J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1576-83; discussion E388-90. PubMed ID: 16025025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Shah RV; Nanieva R; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Kershaw T; Husted DS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(19):2192-9. PubMed ID: 16205346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Range of motion and adjacent level degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement.
    Huang RC; Tropiano P; Marnay T; Girardi FP; Lim MR; Cammisa FP
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 16651217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.