These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30095474)

  • 21. Disc height and motion patterns in the lumbar spine in patients operated with total disc replacement or fusion for discogenic back pain. Results from a randomized controlled trial.
    Berg S; Tropp HT; Leivseth G
    Spine J; 2011 Nov; 11(11):991-8. PubMed ID: 21978518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical outcomes, radiologic kinematics, and effects on sagittal balance of the 6 df LP-ESP lumbar disc prosthesis.
    Lazennec JY; Even J; Skalli W; Rakover JP; Brusson A; Rousseau MA
    Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):1914-20. PubMed ID: 24262858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
    Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of 2 lumbar total disc replacements: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter Food and Drug Administration trial with 24-month follow-up.
    Guyer RD; Pettine K; Roh JS; Dimmig TA; Coric D; McAfee PC; Ohnmeiss DD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(12):925-31. PubMed ID: 24718066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Maverick total disc arthroplasty performs well at 10 years follow-up: a prospective study with HRQL and balance analysis.
    Plais N; Thevenot X; Cogniet A; Rigal J; Le Huec JC
    Eur Spine J; 2018 Mar; 27(3):720-727. PubMed ID: 28382391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.
    Hou Y; Liu Y; Yuan W; Wang X; Chen H; Yang L; Zhang Y
    Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):867-77. PubMed ID: 24076441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Correlation between range of motion and outcome after lumbar total disc replacement: 8.6-year follow-up.
    Huang RC; Girardi FP; Cammisa FP; Lim MR; Tropiano P; Marnay T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jun; 30(12):1407-11. PubMed ID: 15959370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Comparative study of dynamic neutralization system and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in treating lumbar degenerative disease].
    Yang B; Jiang T
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 27(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 23596677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Five-year results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of single-level degenerative disc disease.
    Zigler JE; Delamarter RB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Dec; 17(6):493-501. PubMed ID: 23082846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
    Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Five-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Two Lumbar Total Disc Replacements.
    Guyer RD; Pettine K; Roh JS; Dimmig TA; Coric D; McAfee PC; Ohnmeiss DD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 26335669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Radiological and clinical long-term results of heterotopic ossification following lumbar total disc replacement.
    Park HJ; Lee CS; Chung SS; Park SJ; Kim WS; Park JS; Lee KJ; Hwang CH
    Spine J; 2018 May; 18(5):762-768. PubMed ID: 28939171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site.
    Coric D; Kim PK; Clemente JD; Boltes MO; Nussbaum M; James S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jan; 18(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23140129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
    Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Five-year adjacent-level degenerative changes in patients with single-level disease treated using lumbar total disc replacement with ProDisc-L versus circumferential fusion.
    Zigler JE; Glenn J; Delamarter RB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Dec; 17(6):504-11. PubMed ID: 23082849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of lumbar total disc replacement on the spinopelvic alignment and range of motion of the lumbar spine.
    Chung SS; Lee CS; Kang CS; Kim SH
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Jul; 19(5):307-11. PubMed ID: 16825999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
    Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Long-Term Outcomes Following Lumbar Total Disc Replacement Using ProDisc-II: Average 10-Year Follow-Up at a Single Institute.
    Park SJ; Lee CS; Chung SS; Lee KH; Kim WS; Lee JY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jun; 41(11):971-977. PubMed ID: 26909840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Cervical Total Disk Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Fusion: Results at 48 Months Follow-up.
    Hisey MS; Bae HW; Davis RJ; Gaede S; Hoffman G; Kim KD; Nunley PD; Peterson D; Rashbaum RF; Stokes J; Ohnmeiss DD
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 May; 28(4):E237-43. PubMed ID: 25310394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty in patients older than 60 years of age: a prospective study of the ProDisc prosthesis with 2-year minimum follow-up period.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Nanieva R; Fenk-Mayer A; Husted DS; Shah RV; Emerson JW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Feb; 4(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 16506473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.