174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30095509)
1. Using Continuous Vital Sign Monitoring to Detect Early Deterioration in Adult Postoperative Inpatients.
Verrillo SC; Cvach M; Hudson KW; Winters BD
J Nurs Care Qual; 2019; 34(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 30095509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of wearable continuous vital sign monitoring on deterioration detection and clinical outcomes in hospitalised patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Areia C; Biggs C; Santos M; Thurley N; Gerry S; Tarassenko L; Watkinson P; Vollam S
Crit Care; 2021 Sep; 25(1):351. PubMed ID: 34583742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Continuous Physiological Monitoring Improves Patient Outcomes.
Stellpflug C; Pierson L; Roloff D; Mosman E; Gross T; Marsh S; Willis V; Gabrielson D
Am J Nurs; 2021 Apr; 121(4):40-46. PubMed ID: 33755624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wireless and continuous monitoring of vital signs in patients at the general ward.
Weenk M; Koeneman M; van de Belt TH; Engelen LJLPG; van Goor H; Bredie SJH
Resuscitation; 2019 Mar; 136():47-53. PubMed ID: 30685546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost utility analysis of continuous and intermittent versus intermittent vital signs monitoring in patients admitted to surgical wards.
Javanbakht M; Mashayekhi A; Trevor M; Rezaei Hemami M; L Downey C; Branagan-Harris M; Atkinson J
J Med Econ; 2020 Jul; 23(7):728-736. PubMed ID: 32212979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Towards development of alert thresholds for clinical deterioration using continuous predictive analytics monitoring.
Keim-Malpass J; Clark MT; Lake DE; Moorman JR
J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Aug; 34(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 31327101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Review: Continuous Monitoring to Detect Failure to Rescue in Adult Postoperative Inpatients.
Verrillo SC; Winters BD
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2018; 52(4):281-287. PubMed ID: 30070913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current Evidence for Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring by Wearable Wireless Devices in Hospitalized Adults: Systematic Review.
Leenen JPL; Leerentveld C; van Dijk JD; van Westreenen HL; Schoonhoven L; Patijn GA
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e18636. PubMed ID: 32469323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementation of a Vital Sign Alert System to Improve Outcomes.
Huff S; Stephens K; Whiteman K; Swanson-Biearman B; Mori C
J Nurs Care Qual; 2019; 34(4):346-351. PubMed ID: 30585982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a wireless, portable, wearable multi-parameter vital signs monitor in hospitalized neurological and neurosurgical patients.
Weller RS; Foard KL; Harwood TN
J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Oct; 32(5):945-951. PubMed ID: 29214598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The value of vital sign trends in predicting and monitoring clinical deterioration: A systematic review.
Brekke IJ; Puntervoll LH; Pedersen PB; Kellett J; Brabrand M
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210875. PubMed ID: 30645637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of continuous or intermittent vital signs monitoring in preventing adverse events on general wards: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cardona-Morrell M; Prgomet M; Turner RM; Nicholson M; Hillman K
Int J Clin Pract; 2016 Oct; 70(10):806-824. PubMed ID: 27582503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early recognition of acutely deteriorating patients in non-intensive care units: assessment of an innovative monitoring technology.
Zimlichman E; Szyper-Kravitz M; Shinar Z; Klap T; Levkovich S; Unterman A; Rozenblum R; Rothschild JM; Amital H; Shoenfeld Y
J Hosp Med; 2012 Oct; 7(8):628-33. PubMed ID: 22865462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can continuous remote vital sign monitoring reduce the number of room visits to patients suspected of COVID-19: A quasi-experimental study.
van Goor HMR; Eddahchouri Y; van Loon K; Bredie SJH; Schoonhoven L; Kaasjager HAH; van Goor H
Int J Nurs Stud; 2021 Mar; 115():103868. PubMed ID: 33465579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Record review to explore the adequacy of post-operative vital signs monitoring using a local modified early warning score (mews) chart to evaluate outcomes.
Kyriacos U; Jelsma J; Jordan S
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87320. PubMed ID: 24498075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Developing a continuous monitoring infrastructure for detection of inpatient deterioration.
Pyke J; Taenzer AH; Renaud CE; McGrath SP
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2012 Sep; 38(9):428-31, 385. PubMed ID: 23002497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vital sign abnormalities as predictors of clinical deterioration in subacute care patients: A prospective case-time-control study.
Considine J; Street M; Hutchinson AM; Mohebbi M; Rawson H; Dunning T; Botti M; Duke MM; Hutchison AF; Bucknall T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2020 Aug; 108():103612. PubMed ID: 32473397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nursing assessment of continuous vital sign surveillance to improve patient safety on the medical/surgical unit.
Watkins T; Whisman L; Booker P
J Clin Nurs; 2016 Jan; 25(1-2):278-81. PubMed ID: 26531215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Postoperative ward monitoring - Why and what now?
Khanna AK; Ahuja S; Weller RS; Harwood TN
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2019 Jun; 33(2):229-245. PubMed ID: 31582102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The future of postoperative vital sign monitoring in general wards: improving patient safety through continuous artificial intelligence-enabled alert formation and reduction.
Aasvang EK; Meyhoff CS
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2023 Dec; 36(6):683-690. PubMed ID: 37865847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
