BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30095767)

  • 21. First trimester fasting plasma glucose screen in advanced maternal age women: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Waites BT; Walker AR; Skeith AA; Caughey AB
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Nov; 35(21):4123-4129. PubMed ID: 33179564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine third trimester ultrasound screening for intrauterine growth restriction: study protocol of a nationwide stepped wedge cluster-randomized trial in The Netherlands (The IRIS Study).
    Henrichs J; Verfaille V; Viester L; Westerneng M; Molewijk B; Franx A; van der Horst H; Bosmans JE; de Jonge A; Jellema P;
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Oct; 16(1):310. PubMed ID: 27737654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of the value of rescreening for syphilis in the third trimester of pregnancy.
    Edwards RK; Bennett M; Langstraat C; Greene D
    Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 2006; 2006():56504. PubMed ID: 17485804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Antenatal syphilis screening in sub-Saharan Africa: lessons learned from Tanzania.
    Watson-Jones D; Oliff M; Terris-Prestholt F; Changalucha J; Gumodoka B; Mayaud P; Semakafu AM; Kumaranayake L; Gavyole A; Mabey D; Hayes R
    Trop Med Int Health; 2005 Sep; 10(9):934-43. PubMed ID: 16135202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Disparities in state-mandated third-trimester testing for syphilis.
    Clement AC; Fay KE; Yee LM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 May; 4(3):100595. PubMed ID: 35176505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cost-effectiveness of rapid point-of-care prenatal syphilis screening in sub-Saharan Africa.
    Rydzak CE; Goldie SJ
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Sep; 35(9):775-84. PubMed ID: 18607319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of universal screening for thyroid disease in pregnant women in Spain].
    Donnay Candil S; Balsa Barro JA; Álvarez Hernández J; Crespo Palomo C; Pérez-Alcántara F; Polanco Sánchez C
    Endocrinol Nutr; 2015; 62(7):322-30. PubMed ID: 25977144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Surveillance of Maternal Syphilis in China: Pregnancy Outcomes and Determinants of Congenital Syphilis.
    Zhang X; Yu Y; Yang H; Xu H; Vermund SH; Liu K
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 Oct; 24():7727-7735. PubMed ID: 30370903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Association between different treatment timings and adverse neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with syphilis during pregnancy].
    Hu F; Huang ZQ; Cai M; Xu HF; Jiang HB; Gao S
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Nov; 57(11):1782-1787. PubMed ID: 38008566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Why Are Mothers Still Passing Syphilis to Their Babies?
    Rubin R
    JAMA; 2019 Feb; 321(8):729-731. PubMed ID: 30725108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Economic and programmatic aspects of congenital syphilis prevention.
    Schmid G
    Bull World Health Organ; 2004 Jun; 82(6):402-9. PubMed ID: 15356931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Economic evaluation of maternal screening to prevent congenital syphilis.
    Stray-Pedersen B
    Sex Transm Dis; 1983; 10(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 6665662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Screening for syphilis infection in pregnant women: evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement.
    Wolff T; Shelton E; Sessions C; Miller T
    Ann Intern Med; 2009 May; 150(10):710-6. PubMed ID: 19451578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Syphilis in Pregnancy.
    Adhikari EH
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 135(5):1121-1135. PubMed ID: 32282589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Assessment of the congenital syphilis prevention programs].
    Daoud M; Duca E; Onofriescu M; Petrescu Z
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2011; 115(3):934-7. PubMed ID: 22046811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The cost-effectiveness of syphilis screening in pregnant women: a systematic literature review.
    Zhang M; Zhang H; Hui X; Qu H; Xia J; Xu F; Shi C; He J; Cao Y; Hu M
    Front Public Health; 2024; 12():1268653. PubMed ID: 38577277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effectiveness of interventions to improve screening for syphilis in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hawkes S; Matin N; Broutet N; Low N
    Lancet Infect Dis; 2011 Sep; 11(9):684-91. PubMed ID: 21683653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Congenital syphilis: an economic evaluation of a prevention program in China.
    Hong FC; Liu JB; Feng TJ; Liu XL; Pan P; Zhou H; Cai YM; Ling L; Huang XM; Zhang D; Zhang YJ; Zeegers MP
    Sex Transm Dis; 2010 Jan; 37(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 19734825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cost-effectiveness of universal compared with voluntary screening for human immunodeficiency virus among pregnant women in Chicago.
    Immergluck LC; Cull WL; Schwartz A; Elstein AS
    Pediatrics; 2000 Apr; 105(4):E54. PubMed ID: 10742375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cost-effectiveness of on-site antenatal screening to prevent congenital syphilis in rural eastern Cape Province, Republic of South Africa.
    Blandford JM; Gift TL; Vasaikar S; Mwesigwa-Kayongo D; Dlali P; Bronzan RN
    Sex Transm Dis; 2007 Jul; 34(7 Suppl):S61-6. PubMed ID: 17308502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.