BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30095793)

  • 1. The Impact of Comorbidity Burden on Complications, Length of Stay, and Direct Hospital Costs After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Khechen B; Haws BE; Bawa MS; Patel DV; Cardinal KL; Guntin JA; Lalehzarian SP; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Mar; 44(5):363-368. PubMed ID: 30095793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diabetes Does Not Increase Complications, Length of Stay, or Hospital Costs After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Narain AS; Haws BE; Jenkins NW; Parrish JM; Block AM; Lamoutte EH; Karmarkar SS; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Aug; 33(7):E307-E311. PubMed ID: 32433099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Impact of Comorbidity Burden on Postoperative PROMIS Physical Function Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Parrish JM; Jenkins NW; Hrynewycz NM; Brundage TS; Yoo JS; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Jul; 33(6):E294-E298. PubMed ID: 31913181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Elderly as a Predictor for Perioperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Multilevel Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Regression Modeling Study.
    Claus CF; Lytle E; Tong D; Bahoura M; Garmo L; Yoon E; Jasinski J; Kaufmann A; Richards B; Soo TM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Jun; 45(11):735-740. PubMed ID: 31860630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Charlson comorbidity index is predictive of postoperative clinical outcome after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
    Shinonara K; Ugawa R; Arataki S; Nakahara S; Takeuchi K
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Mar; 16(1):235. PubMed ID: 33785033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does Day of Surgery Affect Hospital Length of Stay and Charges Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Hijji FY; Narain AS; Haws BE; Khechen B; Kudaravalli KT; Yom KH; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Jun; 31(5):E291-E295. PubMed ID: 29608450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effect of Preoperative Medications on Length of Stay, Inpatient Pain, and Narcotics Consumption After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Haws BE; Khechen B; Patel DV; Bawa MS; Guntin JA; Cardinal KL; Wiggins AB; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Feb; 32(1):E37-E42. PubMed ID: 30234567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of Blood Loss, Surgical Complications, and Hospital Course.
    Patel AA; Zfass-Mendez M; Lebwohl NH; Wang MY; Green BA; Levi AD; Vanni S; Williams SK
    Iowa Orthop J; 2015; 35():130-4. PubMed ID: 26361455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of perioperative costs and outcomes in patients with and without workers' compensation claims treated with minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Pelton MA; Phillips FM; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22):1914-9. PubMed ID: 22487713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Iliac Crest Bone Graft for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Analysis of Inpatient Pain, Narcotics Consumption, and Costs.
    Haws BE; Khechen B; Narain AS; Hijji FY; Cardinal KL; Guntin JA; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Sep; 43(18):1307-1312. PubMed ID: 29462060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
    Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of local steroid application in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial.
    Haws BE; Khechen B; Patel DV; Bawa MS; Ahn J; Bohl DD; Mayo BC; Massel DH; Guntin JA; Cardinal KL; Singh K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):222-227. PubMed ID: 30497132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of body mass index on surgical outcomes, narcotics consumption, and hospital costs following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
    Narain AS; Hijji FY; Haws BE; Kudaravalli KT; Yom KH; Markowitz J; Singh K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Feb; 28(2):160-166. PubMed ID: 29192877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of complications, costs, and length of stay of three different lumbar interbody fusion techniques: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database.
    Goz V; Weinreb JH; Schwab F; Lafage V; Errico TJ
    Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2019-27. PubMed ID: 24333459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m
    Krüger MT; Naseri Y; Hohenhaus M; Hubbe U; Scholz C; Klingler JH
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Mar; 178():82-85. PubMed ID: 30739072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postoperative Narcotic Consumption in Workman's Compensation Patients Following a Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Ahn J; Bohl DD; Elboghdady I; Aboushaala K; Mayo BC; Hassanzadeh H; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Aug; 40(16):1284-8. PubMed ID: 25996538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Zuckerman SL; Godil SS; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):230-8. PubMed ID: 23321379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients.
    Wang MY; Lerner J; Lesko J; McGirt MJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Aug; 25(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 21685806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Lerner J; Engelhart L; Knight T; Wang MY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jun; 14(6):771-8. PubMed ID: 21417699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.