These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30095793)

  • 21. Perioperative complications related to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion: evaluation of 204 operations on lumbar instability at single center.
    Wang J; Zhou Y
    Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2078-84. PubMed ID: 24361997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients.
    Wong AP; Smith ZA; Nixon AT; Lawton CD; Dahdaleh NS; Wong RH; Auffinger B; Lam S; Song JK; Liu JC; Koski TR; Fessler RG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 25700243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
    Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients.
    Lau D; Khan A; Terman SW; Yee T; La Marca F; Park P
    Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Aug; 35(2):E10. PubMed ID: 23905948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cost-utility of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Phan K; Hogan JA; Mobbs RJ
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Nov; 24(11):2503-13. PubMed ID: 26195079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Complications Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Incidence, Independent Risk Factors, and Clinical Impact.
    Jenkins NW; Parrish JM; Hrynewycz NM; Brundage TS; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Jun; 33(5):E236-E240. PubMed ID: 31913178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surgical and Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Surgery in an Unselected Patient Cohort of a Spinal Care Unit.
    Senker W; Gruber A; Gmeiner M; Stefanits H; Sander K; Rössler P; Pflugmacher R
    Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 10(3):192-197. PubMed ID: 30152613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diminishing Clinical Returns of Multilevel Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Passias PG; Bortz C; Horn SR; Segreto FA; Stekas N; Ge DH; Alas H; Varlotta CG; Frangella NJ; Lafage R; Lafage V; Steinmetz L; Vasquez-Montes D; Diebo B; Janjua MB; Moawad MA; Deflorimonte C; Protopsaltis TS; Buckland AJ; Gerling MC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Oct; 44(20):E1181-E1187. PubMed ID: 31589201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hidden and overall haemorrhage following minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Yang Y; Zhang L; Liu B; Pang M; Xie P; Chen Z; Wu W; Feng F; Rong L
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2017 Dec; 18(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 28741030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
    World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 22120269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is Body Mass Index a Risk Factor for Revision Procedures After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Narain AS; Hijji FY; Bohl DD; Yom KH; Kudaravalli KT; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Feb; 31(1):E85-E91. PubMed ID: 28538081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multimodal Analgesia Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedures.
    Singh K; Bohl DD; Ahn J; Massel DH; Mayo BC; Narain AS; Hijji FY; Louie PK; Long WW; Modi KD; Kim TD; Kudaravalli KT; Phillips FM; Buvanendran A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Aug; 42(15):1145-1150. PubMed ID: 27879573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway for Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Decreases Length of Stay and Opioid Consumption.
    Kerolus MG; Yerneni K; Witiw CD; Shelton A; Canar WJ; Daily D; Fontes RBV; Deutsch H; Fessler RG; Buvanendran A; O'Toole JE
    Neurosurgery; 2021 Feb; 88(3):648-657. PubMed ID: 33469652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Revision Surgery for Recurrent Herniation After Microendoscopic Discectomy.
    Yao Y; Zhang H; Wu J; Liu H; Zhang Z; Tang Y; Zhou Y
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Mar; 99():89-95. PubMed ID: 27919762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Wang MY; Cummock MD; Yu Y; Trivedi RA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 20515357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Primary MIS TLIF and MIS TLIF With Revision Decompression.
    Khechen B; Haws BE; Patel DV; Narain AS; Hijji FY; Guntin JA; Cardinal KL; Iyer S; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jan; 44(2):150-156. PubMed ID: 30562332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Effects of Marijuana Use on Lumbar Spinal Fusion.
    Jakoi AM; Kirchner GJ; Kerbel YE; Iorio JA; Khalsa AS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):629-634. PubMed ID: 31770339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
    Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The identification of risk factors for increased postoperative pain following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Jenkins NW; Parrish JM; Mayo BC; Hrynewycz NM; Brundage TS; Mogilevsky FA; Yoo JS; Singh K
    Eur Spine J; 2020 Jun; 29(6):1304-1310. PubMed ID: 32076833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.