These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30096018)

  • 1. Familiar Voices Are More Intelligible, Even if They Are Not Recognized as Familiar.
    Holmes E; Domingo Y; Johnsrude IS
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Oct; 29(10):1575-1583. PubMed ID: 30096018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech spoken by familiar people is more resistant to interference by linguistically similar speech.
    Holmes E; Johnsrude IS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1465-1476. PubMed ID: 32105143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intelligibility benefit for familiar voices is not accompanied by better discrimination of fundamental frequency or vocal tract length.
    Holmes E; Johnsrude IS
    Hear Res; 2023 Mar; 429():108704. PubMed ID: 36701896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How Long Does It Take for a Voice to Become Familiar? Speech Intelligibility and Voice Recognition Are Differentially Sensitive to Voice Training.
    Holmes E; To G; Johnsrude IS
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Jun; 32(6):903-915. PubMed ID: 33979256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech-evoked brain activity is more robust to competing speech when it is spoken by someone familiar.
    Holmes E; Johnsrude IS
    Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 237():118107. PubMed ID: 33933598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The processing of intimately familiar and unfamiliar voices: Specific neural responses of speaker recognition and identification.
    Plante-Hébert J; Boucher VJ; Jemel B
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250214. PubMed ID: 33861789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological correlates of voice learning and recognition.
    Zäske R; Volberg G; Kovács G; Schweinberger SR
    J Neurosci; 2014 Aug; 34(33):10821-31. PubMed ID: 25122885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Familiarity and task context shape the use of acoustic information in voice identity perception.
    Lavan N; Kreitewolf J; Obleser J; McGettigan C
    Cognition; 2021 Oct; 215():104780. PubMed ID: 34298232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The benefit to speech intelligibility of hearing a familiar voice.
    Domingo Y; Holmes E; Johnsrude IS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Jun; 26(2):236-247. PubMed ID: 31524431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic-phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility for adults and children.
    Hazan V; Markham D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3108-18. PubMed ID: 15603156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Talker-specific learning in speech perception.
    Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 9599989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gradient language dominance affects talker learning.
    Bregman MR; Creel SC
    Cognition; 2014 Jan; 130(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 24211437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. It doesn't matter what you say: FMRI correlates of voice learning and recognition independent of speech content.
    Zäske R; Awwad Shiekh Hasan B; Belin P
    Cortex; 2017 Sep; 94():100-112. PubMed ID: 28738288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative findings of voice and speech: language processing at an early ontogenetic age in quantitative EEG mapping.
    Radicevic Z; Vujovic M; Jelicic L; Sovilj M
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 184(4):529-32. PubMed ID: 17934726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring the anatomical encoding of voice with a mathematical model of the vocal system.
    Assaneo MF; Sitt J; Varoquaux G; Sigman M; Cohen L; Trevisan MA
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 141():31-39. PubMed ID: 27436593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toddlers' comprehension of adult and child talkers: Adult targets versus vocal tract similarity.
    Cooper A; Fecher N; Johnson EK
    Cognition; 2018 Apr; 173():16-20. PubMed ID: 29287204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity.
    Kreitewolf J; Wöstmann M; Tune S; Plöchl M; Obleser J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1108-1118. PubMed ID: 30993655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-related changes to spectral voice characteristics affect judgments of prosodic, segmental, and talker attributes for child and adult speech.
    Dilley LC; Wieland EA; Gamache JL; McAuley JD; Redford MA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 56(1):159-77. PubMed ID: 23275414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Highly accurate and robust identity perception from personally familiar voices.
    Kanber E; Lavan N; McGettigan C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Apr; 151(4):897-911. PubMed ID: 34672658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.