441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30096490)
1. The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response.
Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():106-112. PubMed ID: 30096490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of monetary reward on listening effort and sentence recognition.
Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108255. PubMed ID: 33964552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.
Miles K; McMahon C; Boisvert I; Ibrahim R; de Lissa P; Graham P; Lyxell B
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517706396. PubMed ID: 28752807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of hearing acuity on psychophysiological responses to effortful speech perception.
Keur-Huizinga L; Huizinga NA; Zekveld AA; Versfeld NJ; van de Ven SRB; van Dijk WAJ; de Geus EJC; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109031. PubMed ID: 38761554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The pupil response reveals increased listening effort when it is difficult to focus attention.
Koelewijn T; de Kluiver H; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():81-90. PubMed ID: 25732724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Please try harder! The influence of hearing status and evaluative feedback during listening on the pupil dilation response, saliva-cortisol and saliva alpha-amylase levels.
Zekveld AA; van Scheepen JAM; Versfeld NJ; Veerman ECI; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 381():107768. PubMed ID: 31387070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
Ohlenforst B; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Wendt D; Naylor G; Wang Y; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pupil Responses of Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury During Processing of Speech in Noise.
Koelewijn T; van Haastrecht JAP; Kramer SE
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518811444. PubMed ID: 30482105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Users: The Effect of Speech Intelligibility, Noise Reduction Processing, and Working Memory Capacity on the Pupil Dilation Response.
Dingemanse G; Goedegebure A
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 65(1):392-404. PubMed ID: 34898265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of informational masking on speech perception and pupil response in adults with hearing impairment.
Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1596-606. PubMed ID: 24606294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of reward and task demand in value-based strategic allocation of auditory comprehension effort.
Zhang M; Siegle GJ; McNeil MR; Pratt SR; Palmer C
Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 381():107775. PubMed ID: 31401432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disentangling listening effort and memory load beyond behavioural evidence: Pupillary response to listening effort during a concurrent memory task.
Zhang Y; Lehmann A; Deroche M
PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0233251. PubMed ID: 33657100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
