These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30096668)

  • 61. Effect of engineered environment on microbial community structure in biofilter and biofilm on reverse osmosis membrane.
    Jeong S; Cho K; Jeong D; Lee S; Leiknes T; Vigneswaran S; Bae H
    Water Res; 2017 Nov; 124():227-237. PubMed ID: 28759795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Effect of conventional chemical treatment on the microbial population in a biofouling layer of reverse osmosis systems.
    Bereschenko LA; Prummel H; Euverink GJ; Stams AJ; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):405-16. PubMed ID: 21111441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
    Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Removal of fouling species from brackish water reverse osmosis reject stream.
    Ayoub GM; Korban L; Al-Hindi M; Zayyat R
    Environ Technol; 2018 Mar; 39(6):804-813. PubMed ID: 28345484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
    D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Simultaneous removal of nitrate and pesticides from groundwater using a methane-fed membrane biofilm reactor.
    Modin O; Fukushi K; Yamamoto K
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(6):1273-9. PubMed ID: 18845866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [Reverse osmosis membrane fouling by humic acid using XDLVO approach: effect of calcium ions].
    Yao SD; Gao XY; Guo BH; Bao N; Xie HJ; Liang S
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2012 Jun; 33(6):1884-90. PubMed ID: 22946170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. COD and nitrogen removal by biofilms growing on gas permeable membranes.
    Semmens MJ; Dahm K; Shanahan J; Christianson A
    Water Res; 2003 Nov; 37(18):4343-50. PubMed ID: 14511704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Biofouling in forward osmosis systems: An experimental and numerical study.
    Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; Vrouwenvelder JS; Picioreanu C
    Water Res; 2016 Dec; 106():86-97. PubMed ID: 27697688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Assessment of online bacterial particle counts for monitoring the performance of reverse osmosis membrane process in potable reuse.
    Fujioka T; Makabe R; Mori N; Snyder SA; Leddy M
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 667():540-544. PubMed ID: 30833252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Combination of cupric ion with hydroxylamine and hydrogen peroxide for the control of bacterial biofilms on RO membranes.
    Lee HJ; Kim HE; Lee C
    Water Res; 2017 Mar; 110():83-90. PubMed ID: 27998786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Two-stage biofilm-MBR for nitrogen removal and enhanced membrane performance.
    Sun C; Leiknes T
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 22744690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Contribution of assimilable organic carbon to biological fouling in seawater reverse osmosis membrane treatment.
    Weinrich L; LeChevallier M; Haas CN
    Water Res; 2016 Sep; 101():203-213. PubMed ID: 27262548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems.
    Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():227-42. PubMed ID: 25282091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Distillery wastewater treatment by the membrane-based nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes.
    Nataraj SK; Hosamani KM; Aminabhavi TM
    Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2349-56. PubMed ID: 16757012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Uranium removal and microbial community in a H2-based membrane biofilm reactor.
    Zhou C; Ontiveros-Valencia A; Cornette de Saint Cyr L; Zevin AS; Carey SE; Krajmalnik-Brown R; Rittmann BE
    Water Res; 2014 Nov; 64():255-264. PubMed ID: 25073000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Harmful algae and their potential impacts on desalination operations off southern California.
    Caron DA; Garneau ME; Seubert E; Howard MD; Darjany L; Schnetzer A; Cetinić I; Filteau G; Lauri P; Jones B; Trussell S
    Water Res; 2010 Jan; 44(2):385-416. PubMed ID: 19664796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. MBR/RO/ozone processes for TFT-LCD industrial wastewater treatment and recycling.
    Chen TK; Ni CH; Chan YC; Lu MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):411-9. PubMed ID: 16004003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: effects of cleaning on biofilm microbial communities, membrane performance, and adherence of extracellular polymeric substances.
    Al Ashhab A; Sweity A; Bayramoglu B; Herzberg M; Gillor O
    Biofouling; 2017 May; 33(5):397-409. PubMed ID: 28468513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Environmental concerns of desalinating seawater using reverse osmosis.
    Tularam GA; Ilahee M
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Aug; 9(8):805-13. PubMed ID: 17671660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.