711 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30096677)
1. Net ecosystem carbon and greenhouse gas budgets in fiber and cereal cropping systems.
Liu C; Yao Z; Wang K; Zheng X; Li B
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jan; 647():895-904. PubMed ID: 30096677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from optimized and alternative cereal cropping systems on the North China Plain: a two-year field study.
Gao B; Ju X; Su F; Meng Q; Oenema O; Christie P; Chen X; Zhang F
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 472():112-24. PubMed ID: 24291136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Greenhouse gas emissions and energy exchange in wet and dry season rice: eddy covariance-based approach.
Swain CK; Nayak AK; Bhattacharyya P; Chatterjee D; Chatterjee S; Tripathi R; Singh NR; Dhal B
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jun; 190(7):423. PubMed ID: 29938374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Greenhouse gas fluxes (CO
Maier R; Hörtnagl L; Buchmann N
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Nov; 849():157541. PubMed ID: 35882341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chinese cropping systems are a net source of greenhouse gases despite soil carbon sequestration.
Gao B; Huang T; Ju X; Gu B; Huang W; Xu L; Rees RM; Powlson DS; Smith P; Cui S
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Dec; 24(12):5590-5606. PubMed ID: 30118572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatiotemporal changes in greenhouse gas emissions and soil organic carbon sequestration for major cropping systems across China and their drivers over the past two decades.
Wang Y; Tao F; Yin L; Chen Y
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Aug; 833():155087. PubMed ID: 35421495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perennial forb invasions alter greenhouse gas balance between ecosystem and atmosphere in an annual grassland in China.
Zhang L; Wang S; Liu S; Liu X; Zou J; Siemann E
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Nov; 642():781-788. PubMed ID: 29920464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhanced rice production but greatly reduced carbon emission following biochar amendment in a metal-polluted rice paddy.
Zhang A; Bian R; Li L; Wang X; Zhao Y; Hussain Q; Pan G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Dec; 22(23):18977-86. PubMed ID: 26213131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Effects of harvest on greenhouse gas emissions from forested swamp during non-growing season in Xiaoxing'an Mountains of China.].
Hao L; Mu CC; Chang YH; Shen ZQ; Han LD; Jiang N; Peng WH
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2019 May; 30(5):1713-1725. PubMed ID: 31107028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of seasonality, transport pathway, and spatial structure on greenhouse gas fluxes in a restored wetland.
McNicol G; Sturtevant CS; Knox SH; Dronova I; Baldocchi DD; Silver WL
Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Jul; 23(7):2768-2782. PubMed ID: 27888548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effects of Water Deficit on Greenhouse Gas Emission in Wheat Field in Different Periods].
Wang XY; Cai HJ; Li L; Xu JT; Chen H
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2019 May; 40(5):2413-2425. PubMed ID: 31087883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Forest and grassland cover types reduce net greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils.
Baah-Acheamfour M; Carlyle CN; Lim SS; Bork EW; Chang SX
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Nov; 571():1115-27. PubMed ID: 27450260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide emissions from the human-impacted Seine watershed in France.
Marescaux A; Thieu V; Garnier J
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 643():247-259. PubMed ID: 29936166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fe(III) fertilization mitigating net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in paddy rice-wheat rotation systems in China.
Liu S; Zhang L; Liu Q; Zou J
Environ Pollut; 2012 May; 164():73-80. PubMed ID: 22343523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of water management practices on subtropical pasture methane emissions and ecosystem service payments.
Chamberlain SD; Groffman PM; Boughton EH; Gomez-Casanovas N; DeLucia EH; Bernacchi CJ; Sparks JP
Ecol Appl; 2017 Jun; 27(4):1199-1209. PubMed ID: 28140494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Greenhouse gas budget (CO2, CH4 and N2O) of intensively managed grassland following restoration.
Merbold L; Eugster W; Stieger J; Zahniser M; Nelson D; Buchmann N
Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Jun; 20(6):1913-28. PubMed ID: 24395474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simulating greenhouse gas budgets of four California cropping systems under conventional and alternative management.
De Gryze S; Wolf A; Kaffka SR; Mitchell J; Rolston DE; Temple SR; Lee J; Six J
Ecol Appl; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1805-19. PubMed ID: 21049871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Agricultural peatland restoration: effects of land-use change on greenhouse gas (CO2 and CH4) fluxes in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.
Knox SH; Sturtevant C; Matthes JH; Koteen L; Verfaillie J; Baldocchi D
Glob Chang Biol; 2015 Feb; 21(2):750-65. PubMed ID: 25229180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of greenhouse gas emissions from rice paddy fields under different nitrogen fertilization loads in Chongming Island, Eastern China.
Zhang X; Yin S; Li Y; Zhuang H; Li C; Liu C
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 472():381-8. PubMed ID: 24295754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Full GHG balance of a drained fen peatland cropped to spring barley and reed canary grass using comparative assessment of CO2 fluxes.
Karki S; Elsgaard L; Kandel TP; Lærke PE
Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Mar; 187(3):62. PubMed ID: 25647790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
