These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30097907)

  • 21. The effects of divided attention and of stimulus repetition on item-item binding in verbal working memory.
    Peterson DJ; Decker R; Naveh-Benjamin M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1955-1969. PubMed ID: 30869953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attention capture without awareness in a non-spatial selection task.
    Oriet C; Pandey M; Kawahara JI
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Feb; 48():117-128. PubMed ID: 27866004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contrasting episodic and template-based guidance during search through natural scenes.
    Bahle B; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):523-536. PubMed ID: 30920285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dual target search: Attention tuned to relative features, both within and across feature dimensions.
    York AA; Sewell DK; Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1368-1386. PubMed ID: 32881554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Merely presenting one's own name along with target items is insufficient to produce a memory advantage for the items: A critical role of relational processing.
    Kim K; Johnson JD; Rothschild DJ; Johnson MK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):360-366. PubMed ID: 30091001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Enhanced memory for scenes presented at behaviorally relevant points in time.
    Lin JY; Pype AD; Murray SO; Boynton GM
    PLoS Biol; 2010 Mar; 8(3):e1000337. PubMed ID: 20305721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The attentional boost effect in free recall dynamics.
    Broitman AW; Swallow KM
    Mem Cognit; 2024 May; 52(4):752-770. PubMed ID: 38082026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interaction between attentional systems and episodic memory encoding: the impact of conflict on binding of information.
    Sperduti M; Armougum A; Makowski D; Blondé P; Piolino P
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Dec; 235(12):3553-3560. PubMed ID: 28879596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Increased experience amplifies the activation of task-irrelevant category representations.
    Wu R; Pruitt Z; Zinszer BD; Cheung OS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):522-532. PubMed ID: 27981522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Relational memory weakness in autism despite the use of a controlled encoding task.
    Minor GN; Hannula DE; Gordon A; Ragland JD; Iosif AM; Solomon M
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1210259. PubMed ID: 37691809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Zooming in on the cause of the perceptual load effect in the go/no-go paradigm.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1072-87. PubMed ID: 26820251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attentional capture in driving displays.
    Arexis M; Maquestiaux F; Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Didierjean A
    Br J Psychol; 2017 May; 108(2):259-275. PubMed ID: 28369841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory.
    Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1677-1693. PubMed ID: 28414499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Self-referent encoding facilitates memory binding in young children: New insights into the self-reference effect in memory development.
    Andrews G; Murphy K; Dunbar M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Oct; 198():104919. PubMed ID: 32629234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attention capture by episodic long-term memory.
    Nickel AE; Hopkins LS; Minor GN; Hannula DE
    Cognition; 2020 Aug; 201():104312. PubMed ID: 32387722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Contingent attentional capture across multiple feature dimensions in a temporal search task.
    Ito M; Kawahara JI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():107-13. PubMed ID: 26637932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contrasting gist-based and template-based guidance during real-world visual search.
    Bahle B; Matsukura M; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):367-386. PubMed ID: 28795834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A context-change account of temporal distinctiveness.
    Siefke BM; Smith TA; Sederberg PB
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1158-1172. PubMed ID: 30912034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of working memory contents and perceptual load on distractor processing: When a response-related distractor is held in working memory.
    Koshino H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():19-25. PubMed ID: 27838400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perceptual load and attentional boost: a study of their interaction.
    Swallow KM; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1034-45. PubMed ID: 24364707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.