115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30098632)
1. Detection of visual stimuli on monocular peripheral head-worn displays.
Pascale MT; Sanderson P; Liu D; Mohamed I; Stigter N; Loeb RG
Appl Ergon; 2018 Nov; 73():167-173. PubMed ID: 30098632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Supporting multiple patient monitoring with head-worn displays and spearcons.
Klueber S; Wolf E; Grundgeiger T; Brecknell B; Mohamed I; Sanderson P
Appl Ergon; 2019 Jul; 78():86-96. PubMed ID: 31046963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attention to Changes on a Head-Worn Display: Two Preclinical Studies with Healthcare Scenarios.
Salisbury IS; Schlosser PD; Tang TL; Browning C; Mohamed I; Grundgeiger T; Loeb RG; Sanderson PM
Hum Factors; 2024 Jan; 66(1):103-125. PubMed ID: 35466744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impacts of using a head-worn display on gait performance during level walking and obstacle crossing.
Kim S; Nussbaum MA; Ulman S
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2018 Apr; 39():142-148. PubMed ID: 29501988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influences of augmented reality head-worn display type and user interface design on performance and usability in simulated warehouse order picking.
Kim S; Nussbaum MA; Gabbard JL
Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():186-193. PubMed ID: 30487099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual information processing from multiple displays.
Johnston JC; Ruthruff E; Lien MC
Hum Factors; 2015 Mar; 57(2):276-97. PubMed ID: 25850158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring the Effect of Head-Worn Displays on Prehospital Teamwork Using Online Simulation: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial.
Davidson TJ; Waxenegger H; Mohamed I; McConnell DS; Sanderson PM
Simul Healthc; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38261519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Depth of focus and visual recognition of imagery presented on simultaneously viewed displays: implications for head-mounted displays.
Winterbottom MD; Patterson R; Pierce BJ; Covas CM; Winner J
Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):907-19. PubMed ID: 17915606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance and comfort on near-eye computer displays.
Sheedy J; Bergstrom N
Optom Vis Sci; 2002 May; 79(5):306-12. PubMed ID: 12035988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Binocular vs. monocular hue perception.
Opper JK; Volbrecht VJ
Vision Res; 2017 Feb; 131():1-15. PubMed ID: 27956117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binocular rivalry and head-worn displays.
Patterson R; Winterbottom M; Pierce B; Fox R
Hum Factors; 2007 Dec; 49(6):1083-96. PubMed ID: 18074707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Use of Head-Worn Displays for Vital Sign Monitoring in Critical and Acute Care: Systematic Review.
Elrose F; Hill A; Liu D; Salisbury I; LeCong T; Loeb RG; Sanderson P
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 May; 9(5):e27165. PubMed ID: 33973863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differential effects of head-mounted displays on visual performance.
Schega L; Hamacher D; Erfuth S; Behrens-Baumann W; Reupsch J; Hoffmann MB
Ergonomics; 2014; 57(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 24219018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advanced auditory displays and head-mounted displays: advantages and disadvantages for monitoring by the distracted anesthesiologist.
Sanderson PM; Watson MO; Russell WJ; Jenkins S; Liu D; Green N; Llewelyn K; Cole P; Shek V; Krupenia SS
Anesth Analg; 2008 Jun; 106(6):1787-97. PubMed ID: 18499611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Impact of Head-Worn Displays on Strategic Alarm Management and Situation Awareness.
Pascale MT; Sanderson P; Liu D; Mohamed I; Brecknell B; Loeb RG
Hum Factors; 2019 Jun; 61(4):537-563. PubMed ID: 30608190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monitoring with head-mounted displays: performance and safety in a full-scale simulator and part-task trainer.
Liu D; Jenkins SA; Sanderson PM; Watson MO; Leane T; Kruys A; Russell WJ
Anesth Analg; 2009 Oct; 109(4):1135-46. PubMed ID: 19762741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. More or less? Improving monocular head mounted display assisted visual search by reducing guidance precision.
Ward M; Helton WS
Appl Ergon; 2022 Jul; 102():103720. PubMed ID: 35247830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Head up versus head down: the costs of imprecision, unreliability, and visual clutter on cue effectiveness for display signaling.
Yeh M; Merlo JL; Wickens CD; Brandenburg DL
Hum Factors; 2003; 45(3):390-407. PubMed ID: 14702991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monocular and dichoptic interactions between moving and stationary stimuli.
Wade NJ; Swanston MT
Perception; 1993; 22(9):1111-9. PubMed ID: 8041594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A monocular, unconscious form of visual attention.
Self MW; Roelfsema PR
J Vis; 2010 Apr; 10(4):17.1-23. PubMed ID: 20465336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
