These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30099671)

  • 1. Prediction of glandularity and breast radiation dose from mammography results in Japanese women.
    Yamamuro M; Asai Y; Yamada K; Ozaki Y; Matsumoto M; Murakami T
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Jan; 57(1):289-298. PubMed ID: 30099671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Glandularity and mean glandular dose determined for individual women at four regional breast cancer screening units in the Netherlands.
    Zoetelief J; Veldkamp WJ; Thijssen MA; Jansen JT
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(7):1807-17. PubMed ID: 16552106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Method for determination of the mean fraction of glandular tissue in individual female breasts using mammography.
    Jansen JT; Veldkamp WJ; Thijssen MA; van Woudenberg S; Zoetelief J
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(24):5953-67. PubMed ID: 16333166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigation of mean glandular dose versus compressed breast thickness relationship for mammography.
    Bor D; Tukel S; Olgar T; Toklu T; Aydin E; Akyol O
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):160-4. PubMed ID: 18420560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do women with dense breasts have higher radiation dose during screening mammography?
    Nguyen JV; Williams MB; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
    Breast J; 2018 Jan; 24(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 28590576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Uncertainties involved in the estimation of mean glandular dose for women in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP).
    Hauge IH; Olerud HM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 23188812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dosimetric implications of age related glandular changes in screening mammography.
    Beckett JR; Kotre CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Mar; 45(3):801-13. PubMed ID: 10730972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast glandularity and mean glandular dose assessment using a deep learning framework: Virtual patients study.
    Massera RT; Tomal A
    Phys Med; 2021 Mar; 83():264-277. PubMed ID: 33984580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient dose in digital mammography.
    Chevalier M; Morán P; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Cepeda T; Vañó E
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2471-9. PubMed ID: 15487727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammographic breast glandularity in Malaysian women: data derived from radiography.
    Jamal N; Ng KH; McLean D; Looi LM; Moosa F
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 14975974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion coefficients for dose estimation in mammography based on a 3D detailed breast model.
    Wang W; Qiu R; Ren L; Liu H; Wu Z; Li C; Niu Y; Li J
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2503-2514. PubMed ID: 28295395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol.
    Dance DR; Skinner CL; Young KC; Beckett JR; Kotre CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Nov; 45(11):3225-40. PubMed ID: 11098900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DOSE DISTRIBUTION IN A BREAST UNDERGOING MAMMOGRAPHY BASED ON A 3D DETAILED BREAST MODEL FOR CHINESE WOMEN.
    Wang W; Qiu R; Ren L; Feng Z; Wu Z; Li C; Niu Y; Li J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Oct; 181(3):221-228. PubMed ID: 29438509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mean glandular dose in digital mamography in women with breast implants.
    Couto LS; Freitas-Junior R; Correa RS; Peixoto JE; Almeida CD; Rodrigues DCN; Glassman LM; Soares LR
    J Radiol Prot; 2019 Apr; 39(2):498-510. PubMed ID: 30812019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A survey of clinical factors and patient dose in mammography.
    Kruger RL; Schueler BA
    Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1449-54. PubMed ID: 11488578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trends in compressed breast thickness and radiation dose in breast screening mammography.
    Robinson M; Kotre CJ
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Mar; 81(963):214-8. PubMed ID: 18270295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. STATISTICAL MODELING OF GLANDULARITY FROM MAMMOGRAPHY IMAGES.
    Castrillón CO; Puerta JA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Dec; 197(3-4):237-244. PubMed ID: 34994783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose and image quality in mammography with an automatic beam quality system.
    Young KC; Ramsdale ML; Rust A
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jun; 69(822):555-62. PubMed ID: 8757659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered.
    Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6337-48. PubMed ID: 26520725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality.
    Østerås BH; Skaane P; Gullien R; Martinsen ACT
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035006. PubMed ID: 29311416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.