410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30100542)
1. Atraumatic Scala Tympani Cochleostomy; Resolution of the Dilemma.
Badr A; Shabana Y; Mokbel K; Elsharabasy A; Ghonim M; Sanna M
J Int Adv Otol; 2018 Aug; 14(2):190-196. PubMed ID: 30100542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode.
Briggs RJ; Tykocinski M; Xu J; Risi F; Svehla M; Cowan R; Stover T; Erfurt P; Lenarz T
Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():42-8. PubMed ID: 17063010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anatomy of the Round Window Region With Relation to Selection of Entry Site Into the Scala Tympani.
Pringle MB; Konieczny KM
Laryngoscope; 2021 Feb; 131(2):E598-E604. PubMed ID: 32415784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Scala tympani cochleostomy II: topography and histology.
Adunka OF; Radeloff A; Gstoettner WK; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
Laryngoscope; 2007 Dec; 117(12):2195-200. PubMed ID: 17909447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The new mid-scala electrode array: a radiologic and histologic study in human temporal bones.
Hassepass F; Bulla S; Maier W; Laszig R; Arndt S; Beck R; Traser L; Aschendorff A
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1415-20. PubMed ID: 24836594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anatomy of the middle-turn cochleostomy.
Isaacson B; Roland PS; Wright CG
Laryngoscope; 2008 Dec; 118(12):2200-4. PubMed ID: 18948831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cochleostomy site: implications for electrode placement and hearing preservation.
Briggs RJ; Tykocinski M; Stidham K; Roberson JB
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Aug; 125(8):870-6. PubMed ID: 16158535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiologic Results and Hearing Preservation With a Straight Narrow Electrode via Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Approach at Initial Activation.
Hassepass F; Aschendorff A; Bulla S; Arndt S; Maier W; Laszig R; Beck R
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 25675315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Round window membrane insertion with perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
Coordes A; Ernst A; Brademann G; Todt I
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1027-32. PubMed ID: 23507991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cochlear implant electrode insertion: in defence of cochleostomy and factors against the round window membrane approach.
Addams-Williams J; Munaweera L; Coleman B; Shepherd R; Backhouse S
Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Aug; 12 Suppl 2():S36-9. PubMed ID: 21917217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does cochleostomy location influence electrode trajectory and intracochlear trauma?
Zhou L; Friedmann DR; Treaba C; Peng R; Roland JT
Laryngoscope; 2015 Apr; 125(4):966-71. PubMed ID: 25345671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of the surgical experience on cochleostomy location: a comparative temporal bone study between endaural and posterior tympanotomy approaches for cochlear implantation.
Vandersteen C; Demarcy T; Roger C; Fontas E; Raffaelli C; Ayache N; Delingette H; Guevara N
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Sep; 273(9):2355-61. PubMed ID: 26475332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a new mid-scala cochlear implant electrode using microcomputed tomography.
Frisch CD; Carlson ML; Lane JI; Driscoll CL
Laryngoscope; 2015 Dec; 125(12):2778-83. PubMed ID: 25946683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anatomy of the round window and hook region of the cochlea with implications for cochlear implantation and other endocochlear surgical procedures.
Li PM; Wang H; Northrop C; Merchant SN; Nadol JB
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 17667773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The insertion trajectory in cochlear implantation - comparison between two approaches.
Shapira Y; Sultan AA; Kronenberg J
Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 131(9):958-61. PubMed ID: 21619439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy.
Rowe D; Chambers S; Hampson A; Eastwood H; Campbell L; O'Leary S
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():49-57. PubMed ID: 26739790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical considerations during cochlear implantation: the utility of temporal bone computed tomography.
Jun B; Song S
J Laryngol Otol; 2021 Feb; 135(2):134-141. PubMed ID: 33536091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The evaluation of a slim perimodiolar electrode: surgical technique in relation to intracochlear position and cochlear implant outcomes.
Heutink F; Verbist BM; Mens LHM; Huinck WJ; Mylanus EAM
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Feb; 277(2):343-350. PubMed ID: 31650350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal cochlear implant insertion vectors.
Meshik X; Holden TA; Chole RA; Hullar TE
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jan; 31(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 19707168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes.
Wanna GB; Noble JH; Carlson ML; Gifford RH; Dietrich MS; Haynes DS; Dawant BM; Labadie RF
Laryngoscope; 2014 Nov; 124 Suppl 6(0 6):S1-7. PubMed ID: 24764083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
