These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30100894)

  • 21. Recognition-induced forgetting is not due to category-based set size.
    Maxcey AM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):187-97. PubMed ID: 26503324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The short- and long-term consequences of directed forgetting in a working memory task.
    Festini SB; Reuter-Lorenz PA
    Memory; 2013; 21(7):763-77. PubMed ID: 23294433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Inverted faces are (eventually) processed holistically.
    Richler JJ; Mack ML; Palmeri TJ; Gauthier I
    Vision Res; 2011 Feb; 51(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 21130798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. I recognise your name but I can't remember your face: An advantage for names in recognition memory.
    Burton AM; Jenkins R; Robertson DJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1847-1854. PubMed ID: 30369295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual working memory capacity for objects from different categories: a face-specific maintenance effect.
    Wong JH; Peterson MS; Thompson JC
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):719-31. PubMed ID: 18675409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The nature of upright and inverted face representations: an adaptation-transfer study of configuration.
    Pichler P; Dosani M; Oruç I; Barton JJ
    Cortex; 2012 Jun; 48(6):725-36. PubMed ID: 21396633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Emotional contexts modulate intentional memory suppression of neutral faces: Insights from ERPs.
    Pierguidi L; Righi S; Gronchi G; Marzi T; Caharel S; Giovannelli F; Viggiano MP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Aug; 106():1-13. PubMed ID: 27234617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Object maintenance beyond their visible parts in working memory.
    Chen S; Töllner T; Müller HJ; Conci M
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Jan; 119(1):347-355. PubMed ID: 29070629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Information processing during face recognition: the effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations.
    Barton JJ; Radcliffe N; Cherkasova MV; Edelman J; Intriligator JM
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1089-105. PubMed ID: 17076068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Visual working memory representations guide the detection of emotional faces: An ERP study.
    Fan L; Ding C; Guo R; Xu M; Diao L; Yang D
    Vision Res; 2016 Feb; 119():1-8. PubMed ID: 26731647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Representational demands modulate involvement of perirhinal cortex in face processing.
    O'Neil EB; Barkley VA; Köhler S
    Hippocampus; 2013 Jul; 23(7):592-605. PubMed ID: 23460411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The activation of visual memory for facial identity is task-dependent: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2014 May; 54():124-34. PubMed ID: 24657481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Revisiting the earliest electrophysiological correlate of familiar face recognition.
    Huang W; Wu X; Hu L; Wang L; Ding Y; Qu Z
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Oct; 120():42-53. PubMed ID: 28684327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Face inversion superiority in a case of prosopagnosia following congenital brain abnormalities: what can it tell us about the specificity and origin of face-processing mechanisms?
    Schmalzl L; Palermo R; Harris IM; Coltheart M
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 26(3):286-306. PubMed ID: 19657795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Privileged access to awareness for faces and objects of expertise.
    Stein T; Reeder RR; Peelen MV
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jun; 42(6):788-98. PubMed ID: 26689308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Discrimination and association processes for faces and non-faces: the effect of rotation.
    Bäuml KH; Schnelzer M; Zimmer A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1997 Feb; 95(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 9062060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Paradoxical configuration effects for faces and objects in prosopagnosia.
    de Gelder B; Rouw R
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(9):1271-9. PubMed ID: 10865103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What do eye movements tell us about the visual perception of individuals with congenital prosopagnosia?
    Malaspina M; Albonico A; Toneatto C; Daini R
    Neuropsychology; 2017 Jul; 31(5):546-563. PubMed ID: 28368140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1518-32. PubMed ID: 15050576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does a cichlid fish process face holistically? Evidence of the face inversion effect.
    Kawasaka K; Hotta T; Kohda M
    Anim Cogn; 2019 Mar; 22(2):153-162. PubMed ID: 30603930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.