BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30101616)

  • 21. Bayesian optimization design for dose-finding based on toxicity and efficacy outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials.
    Takahashi A; Suzuki T
    Pharm Stat; 2021 May; 20(3):422-439. PubMed ID: 33258282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A likelihood-based approach for computing the operating characteristics of the 3+3 phase I clinical trial design with extensions to other A+B designs.
    Chiuzan C; Garrett-Mayer E; Yeatts SD
    Clin Trials; 2015 Feb; 12(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 25349178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Isotonic designs for phase I trials.
    Leung DH; Wang Y
    Control Clin Trials; 2001 Apr; 22(2):126-38. PubMed ID: 11306151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A robust two-stage design identifying the optimal biological dose for phase I/II clinical trials.
    Zang Y; Lee JJ
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 27538818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A design for phase I trials in completely or partially ordered groups.
    Conaway MR
    Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(15):2323-2332. PubMed ID: 28384843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Data-dependent early completion of dose-finding trials for drug-combination.
    Kojima M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Apr; 32(4):820-828. PubMed ID: 36775992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A web tool for designing and conducting phase I trials using the continual reassessment method.
    Wages NA; Petroni GR
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Feb; 18(1):133. PubMed ID: 29402249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Designing and evaluating dose-escalation studies made easy: The MoDEsT web app.
    Pallmann P; Wan F; Mander AP; Wheeler GM; Yap C; Clive S; Hampson LV; Jaki T
    Clin Trials; 2020 Apr; 17(2):147-156. PubMed ID: 31856600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modified isotonic regression based phase I/II clinical trial design identifying optimal biological dose.
    Qiu Y; Zhao Y; Liu H; Cao S; Zhang C; Zang Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2023 Apr; 127():107139. PubMed ID: 36870476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Isotonic designs for phase I cancer clinical trials with multiple risk groups.
    Yuan Z; Chappell R
    Clin Trials; 2004; 1(6):499-508. PubMed ID: 16279290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Design considerations for phase I/II dose finding clinical trials in Immuno-oncology and cell therapy.
    Liu R; Lin J; Li P
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 Sep; 96():106083. PubMed ID: 32659438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fractional dose-finding methods with late-onset toxicity in phase I clinical trials.
    Yin G; Zheng S; Xu J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(4):856-70. PubMed ID: 23786314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Phase I trial design for drug combinations with Bayesian model averaging.
    Jin IH; Huo L; Yin G; Yuan Y
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(2):108-19. PubMed ID: 25641851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance of toxicity probability interval based designs in contrast to the continual reassessment method.
    Horton BJ; Wages NA; Conaway MR
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 27435150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A robust Bayesian dose-finding design for phase I/II clinical trials.
    Liu S; Johnson VE
    Biostatistics; 2016 Apr; 17(2):249-63. PubMed ID: 26486139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bayesian optimal interval design for dose finding in drug-combination trials.
    Lin R; Yin G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2155-2167. PubMed ID: 26178591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Dose-Finding Method Based on Multiple Dosing in Two-Agent Combination Phase I Trials.
    Kakurai Y; Hirakawa A; Hamada C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):1065-76. PubMed ID: 25369852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modeling adverse event counts in phase I clinical trials of a cytotoxic agent.
    Muenz DG; Braun TM; Taylor JM
    Clin Trials; 2018 Aug; 15(4):386-397. PubMed ID: 29779418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A non-parametric approach to the design and analysis of two-dimensional dose-finding trials.
    Ivanova A; Wang K
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(12):1861-70. PubMed ID: 15195320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accelerated titration designs for phase I clinical trials in oncology.
    Simon R; Freidlin B; Rubinstein L; Arbuck SG; Collins J; Christian MC
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Aug; 89(15):1138-47. PubMed ID: 9262252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.