These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30102240)
1. Exploration and application of phenomenological RBE models for proton therapy. Rørvik E; Fjæra LF; Dahle TJ; Dale JE; Engeseth GM; Stokkevåg CH; Thörnqvist S; Ytre-Hauge KS Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(18):185013. PubMed ID: 30102240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inclusion of a variable RBE into proton and photon plan comparison for various fractionation schedules in prostate radiation therapy. Ödén J; Eriksson K; Toma-Dasu I Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):810-822. PubMed ID: 28107554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biological dose and complication probabilities for the rectum and bladder based on linear energy transfer distributions in spot scanning proton therapy of prostate cancer. Pedersen J; Petersen JBB; Stokkevåg CH; Ytre-Hauge KS; Flampouri S; Li Z; Mendenhall N; Muren LP Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1413-1419. PubMed ID: 29037095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variable RBE in proton therapy: comparison of different model predictions and their influence on clinical-like scenarios. Giovannini G; Böhlen T; Cabal G; Bauer J; Tessonnier T; Frey K; Debus J; Mairani A; Parodi K Radiat Oncol; 2016 May; 11():68. PubMed ID: 27185038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Linear energy transfer distributions in the brainstem depending on tumour location in intensity-modulated proton therapy of paediatric cancer. Fjæra LF; Li Z; Ytre-Hauge KS; Muren LP; Indelicato DJ; Lassen-Ramshad Y; Engeseth GM; Brydøy M; Mairani A; Flampouri S; Dahl O; Stokkevåg CH Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):763-768. PubMed ID: 28423966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proton Treatment Techniques for Posterior Fossa Tumors: Consequences for Linear Energy Transfer and Dose-Volume Parameters for the Brainstem and Organs at Risk. Giantsoudi D; Adams J; MacDonald SM; Paganetti H Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Feb; 97(2):401-410. PubMed ID: 27986346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatial correlation of linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness with suspected treatment-related toxicities following proton therapy for intracranial tumors. Ödén J; Toma-Dasu I; Witt Nyström P; Traneus E; Dasu A Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):342-351. PubMed ID: 31705671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can We Advance Proton Therapy for Prostate? Considering Alternative Beam Angles and Relative Biological Effectiveness Variations When Comparing Against Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. Underwood T; Giantsoudi D; Moteabbed M; Zietman A; Efstathiou J; Paganetti H; Lu HM Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):454-464. PubMed ID: 27084660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Difference in LET-based biological doses between IMPT optimization techniques: Robust and PTV-based optimizations. Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Yasuda K; Takao S; Fujii T; Miyamoto N; Umegaki K; Shimizu S J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 21(4):42-50. PubMed ID: 32150329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of respiratory motion on variable relative biological effectiveness in 4D-dose distributions of proton therapy. Ulrich S; Wieser HP; Cao W; Mohan R; Bangert M Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1420-1427. PubMed ID: 28828913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Introducing Proton Track-End Objectives in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Optimization to Reduce Linear Energy Transfer and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Critical Structures. Traneus E; Ödén J Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Mar; 103(3):747-757. PubMed ID: 30395906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The dirty and clean dose concept: Towards creating proton therapy treatment plans with a photon-like dose response. Heuchel L; Hahn C; Ödén J; Traneus E; Wulff J; Timmermann B; Bäumer C; Lühr A Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 51(1):622-636. PubMed ID: 37877574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can particle beam therapy be improved using helium ions? - a planning study focusing on pediatric patients. Knäusl B; Fuchs H; Dieckmann K; Georg D Acta Oncol; 2016 Jun; 55(6):751-9. PubMed ID: 26750803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A systematic approach for calibrating a Monte Carlo code to a treatment planning system for obtaining dose, LET, variable proton RBE and out-of-field dose. Tjelta J; Fjæra LF; Ytre-Hauge KS; Boer CG; Stokkevåg CH Phys Med Biol; 2023 Nov; 68(22):. PubMed ID: 37820690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigating the impact of alpha/beta and LET Mara E; Clausen M; Khachonkham S; Deycmar S; Pessy C; Dörr W; Kuess P; Georg D; Gruber S Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3691-3702. PubMed ID: 32347564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer. Rana S; Zheng Y J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physical and biological impacts of collimator-scattered protons in spot-scanning proton therapy. Ueno K; Matsuura T; Hirayama S; Takao S; Ueda H; Matsuo Y; Yoshimura T; Umegaki K J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):48-57. PubMed ID: 31237090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of potentially variable RBE in liver proton therapy. Chen Y; Grassberger C; Li J; Hong TS; Paganetti H Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(19):195001. PubMed ID: 30183674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A phenomenological relative biological effectiveness approach for proton therapy based on an improved description of the mixed radiation field. Mairani A; Dokic I; Magro G; Tessonnier T; Bauer J; Böhlen TT; Ciocca M; Ferrari A; Sala PR; Jäkel O; Debus J; Haberer T; Abdollahi A; Parodi K Phys Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 62(4):1378-1395. PubMed ID: 28114106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]