427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30102240)
1. Exploration and application of phenomenological RBE models for proton therapy.
Rørvik E; Fjæra LF; Dahle TJ; Dale JE; Engeseth GM; Stokkevåg CH; Thörnqvist S; Ytre-Hauge KS
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(18):185013. PubMed ID: 30102240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inclusion of a variable RBE into proton and photon plan comparison for various fractionation schedules in prostate radiation therapy.
Ödén J; Eriksson K; Toma-Dasu I
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):810-822. PubMed ID: 28107554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biological dose and complication probabilities for the rectum and bladder based on linear energy transfer distributions in spot scanning proton therapy of prostate cancer.
Pedersen J; Petersen JBB; Stokkevåg CH; Ytre-Hauge KS; Flampouri S; Li Z; Mendenhall N; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1413-1419. PubMed ID: 29037095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variable RBE in proton therapy: comparison of different model predictions and their influence on clinical-like scenarios.
Giovannini G; Böhlen T; Cabal G; Bauer J; Tessonnier T; Frey K; Debus J; Mairani A; Parodi K
Radiat Oncol; 2016 May; 11():68. PubMed ID: 27185038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Linear energy transfer distributions in the brainstem depending on tumour location in intensity-modulated proton therapy of paediatric cancer.
Fjæra LF; Li Z; Ytre-Hauge KS; Muren LP; Indelicato DJ; Lassen-Ramshad Y; Engeseth GM; Brydøy M; Mairani A; Flampouri S; Dahl O; Stokkevåg CH
Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):763-768. PubMed ID: 28423966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proton Treatment Techniques for Posterior Fossa Tumors: Consequences for Linear Energy Transfer and Dose-Volume Parameters for the Brainstem and Organs at Risk.
Giantsoudi D; Adams J; MacDonald SM; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Feb; 97(2):401-410. PubMed ID: 27986346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatial correlation of linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness with suspected treatment-related toxicities following proton therapy for intracranial tumors.
Ödén J; Toma-Dasu I; Witt Nyström P; Traneus E; Dasu A
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):342-351. PubMed ID: 31705671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can We Advance Proton Therapy for Prostate? Considering Alternative Beam Angles and Relative Biological Effectiveness Variations When Comparing Against Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.
Underwood T; Giantsoudi D; Moteabbed M; Zietman A; Efstathiou J; Paganetti H; Lu HM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):454-464. PubMed ID: 27084660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Difference in LET-based biological doses between IMPT optimization techniques: Robust and PTV-based optimizations.
Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Yasuda K; Takao S; Fujii T; Miyamoto N; Umegaki K; Shimizu S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 21(4):42-50. PubMed ID: 32150329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of respiratory motion on variable relative biological effectiveness in 4D-dose distributions of proton therapy.
Ulrich S; Wieser HP; Cao W; Mohan R; Bangert M
Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1420-1427. PubMed ID: 28828913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Introducing Proton Track-End Objectives in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Optimization to Reduce Linear Energy Transfer and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Critical Structures.
Traneus E; Ödén J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Mar; 103(3):747-757. PubMed ID: 30395906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The dirty and clean dose concept: Towards creating proton therapy treatment plans with a photon-like dose response.
Heuchel L; Hahn C; Ödén J; Traneus E; Wulff J; Timmermann B; Bäumer C; Lühr A
Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 51(1):622-636. PubMed ID: 37877574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing biological effectiveness guided plan optimization strategies for cranial proton therapy: potential and challenges.
Hahn C; Heuchel L; Ödén J; Traneus E; Wulff J; Plaude S; Timmermann B; Bäumer C; Lühr A
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Oct; 17(1):169. PubMed ID: 36273132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can particle beam therapy be improved using helium ions? - a planning study focusing on pediatric patients.
Knäusl B; Fuchs H; Dieckmann K; Georg D
Acta Oncol; 2016 Jun; 55(6):751-9. PubMed ID: 26750803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A systematic approach for calibrating a Monte Carlo code to a treatment planning system for obtaining dose, LET, variable proton RBE and out-of-field dose.
Tjelta J; Fjæra LF; Ytre-Hauge KS; Boer CG; Stokkevåg CH
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Nov; 68(22):. PubMed ID: 37820690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigating the impact of alpha/beta and LET
Mara E; Clausen M; Khachonkham S; Deycmar S; Pessy C; Dörr W; Kuess P; Georg D; Gruber S
Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3691-3702. PubMed ID: 32347564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physical and biological impacts of collimator-scattered protons in spot-scanning proton therapy.
Ueno K; Matsuura T; Hirayama S; Takao S; Ueda H; Matsuo Y; Yoshimura T; Umegaki K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):48-57. PubMed ID: 31237090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of potentially variable RBE in liver proton therapy.
Chen Y; Grassberger C; Li J; Hong TS; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(19):195001. PubMed ID: 30183674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A phenomenological relative biological effectiveness approach for proton therapy based on an improved description of the mixed radiation field.
Mairani A; Dokic I; Magro G; Tessonnier T; Bauer J; Böhlen TT; Ciocca M; Ferrari A; Sala PR; Jäkel O; Debus J; Haberer T; Abdollahi A; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 62(4):1378-1395. PubMed ID: 28114106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
