173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30102449)
1. Prospective comparison between DCE-MRR and
Wan-Li Z; Jun T; Yu-Dong Z; Fei S; Zhijian H; Chen-Jiang W; Zijie W; Yongjun L; Hongliang Q; Zhengkai H; Zengjun W; Ruoyun T; Min G
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jan; 49(1):262-269. PubMed ID: 30102449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of methods for determination of glomerular filtration rate: low and high-dose Tc-99m-DTPA renography, predicted creatinine clearance method, and plasma sample method.
Assadi M; Eftekhari M; Hozhabrosadati M; Saghari M; Ebrahimi A; Nabipour I; Abbasi MZ; Moshtaghi D; Abbaszadeh M; Assadi S
Int Urol Nephrol; 2008; 40(4):1059-65. PubMed ID: 18690545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective pediatric study comparing glomerular filtration rate estimates based on motion-robust dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and serum creatinine (eGFR) to
Kurugol S; Afacan O; Lee RS; Seager CM; Ferguson MA; Stein DR; Nichols RC; Dugan M; Stemmer A; Warfield SK; Chow JS
Pediatr Radiol; 2020 May; 50(5):698-705. PubMed ID: 31984436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Accuracy of Renal Function Measurements in Obstructive Hydronephrosis Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Renography.
Wang YC; Chang D; Zhang SJ; Wang Q; Ju S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Oct; 213(4):859-866. PubMed ID: 31237781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility of gamma camera-based GFR measurement using renal depth evaluated by lateral scan of
Sugawara S; Ishii S; Kojima Y; Ito H; Suzuki Y; Oriuchi N
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 May; 34(5):349-357. PubMed ID: 32166712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Performance of Improved Serum Estimators of Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) to
Haddadin Z; Lee V; Conlin C; Zhang L; Carlston K; Morrell G; Kim D; Hoffman JM; Morton K
J Nucl Med Technol; 2017 Mar; 45(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 28154020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of Glomerular Filtration Rate with CT Measurement of Renal Clearance of Iodinated Contrast Material versus
Yuan X; Zhang J; Tang K; Quan C; Tian Y; Li H; Ao G; Qiu L
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):552-560. PubMed ID: 27556274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New normal values not related to age and sex, of glomerular filtration rate by (99m)Tc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging, for the evaluation of living kidney graft donors.
Zhao X; Shao Y; Wang Y; Tian J; Sun B; Ru Y; Zhang A; Hao J
Hell J Nucl Med; 2012; 15(3):210-4. PubMed ID: 23106053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of six radionuclidic and non-radionuclidic methods for the assessment of glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic renal failure].
Fotopoulos A; Bokharhli JA; Tsiouris S; Katsaraki A; Papadopoulos A; Tsironi M; Theodorou J
Hell J Nucl Med; 2006; 9(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 16894423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of methods for determination of glomerular filtration rate: Tc-99m-DTPA renography, predicted creatinine clearance method and plasma sample method.
Itoh K
Ann Nucl Med; 2003 Oct; 17(7):561-5. PubMed ID: 14651355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. (99m)Tc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging method may be unsuitable to be used as the reference method in investigating the validity of CDK-EPI equation for determining glomerular filtration rate.
Xie P; Huang JM; Liu XM; Wu WJ; Pan LP; Lin HY
PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e62328. PubMed ID: 23658724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of the glomerular filtration rate in patients with type 2 diabetes: An assessment of the agreement between
Moralidis E; Papanastasiou E; Didangelos T; Hilidis I; Siountas A; Arsos G
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2020 Mar; 161():108079. PubMed ID: 32057963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Kidney function: glomerular filtration rate measurement with MR renography in patients with cirrhosis.
Vivier PH; Storey P; Rusinek H; Zhang JL; Yamamoto A; Tantillo K; Khan U; Lim RP; Babb JS; John D; Teperman LW; Chandarana H; Friedman K; Benstein JA; Skolnik EY; Lee VS
Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 21386050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR renography for renal function evaluation in ureteropelvic junction obstruction: feasibility study.
Krepkin K; Won E; Ramaswamy K; Triolo M; Stiffelma M; Rusinek H; Chandarana H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Apr; 202(4):778-83. PubMed ID: 24660706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Glomerular filtration rate measured by (99m) Tc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging is significantly lower than that estimated by the CKD-EPI equation in horseshoe kidney patients.
Qi Y; Hu P; Xie Y; Wei K; Jin M; Ma G; Li Q; Xu B; Chen X
Nephrology (Carlton); 2016 Jun; 21(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 26517584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of simultaneous plasma clearance of
Andersen TB; Jødal L; Nielsen NS; Petersen LJ
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2019 Nov; 79(7):463-467. PubMed ID: 31502901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with Tc-99m-DTPA and tubular extraction rate (TER) with Tc-99m-MAG3 in potential living kidney donors: Feasibility of a one-day protocol.
Rogasch JMM; Bamm M; Bäder M; Jaeschke E; Brenner W; van der Giet M; Amthauer H; Schatka I
Nuklearmedizin; 2019 Dec; 58(6):460-469. PubMed ID: 31600814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new quantitative method for estimating glomerular filtration rate and its clinical value.
Cheng MH; Zeng FW; Xie LJ; Li JF; Zhang F; Jiang H
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2016 Mar; 36(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 25412856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging with modified MDRD equation for glomerular filtration rate estimation in Chinese patients in different stages of chronic kidney disease.
Ma YC; Zuo L; Zhang CL; Wang M; Wang RF; Wang HY
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Feb; 22(2):417-23. PubMed ID: 17053082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of early diethylentriamine penta-acetic acid renograms in predicting late allograft outcomes.
Baskin E; Gulleroglu K; Aktas A; Bayrakci US; Melek E; Uslu N; Bahceci T; Akdur A; Moray G; Haberal M
Transplant Proc; 2013; 45(10):3505-7. PubMed ID: 24314943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
