199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30102622)
1. Current status and progress of focal therapy in Asia.
Shiraishi T; Ukimura O
Curr Opin Urol; 2018 Nov; 28(6):529-535. PubMed ID: 30102622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Focal therapy for prostate cancer: concepts and future directions.
Ashrafi AN; Tafuri A; Cacciamani GE; Park D; de Castro Abreu AL; Gill IS
Curr Opin Urol; 2018 Nov; 28(6):536-543. PubMed ID: 30102623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate cancer multifocality, the index lesion, and the microenvironment.
Tourinho-Barbosa RR; de la Rosette J; Sanchez-Salas R
Curr Opin Urol; 2018 Nov; 28(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 30138121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR-Guided Prostate Interventions.
Woodrum DA; Gorny KR; Mynderse LA
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 27(3):141-151. PubMed ID: 29870466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Targeted prostate biopsy and MR-guided therapy for prostate cancer.
Woodrum DA; Kawashima A; Gorny KR; Mynderse LA
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 May; 41(5):877-88. PubMed ID: 26907717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Focal vs extended ablation in localized prostate cancer with irreversible electroporation; a multi-center randomized controlled trial.
Scheltema MJ; van den Bos W; de Bruin DM; Wijkstra H; Laguna MP; de Reijke TM; de la Rosette JJ
BMC Cancer; 2016 May; 16():299. PubMed ID: 27150293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An initial negative round of targeted biopsies in men with highly suspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance findings does not exclude clinically significant prostate cancer-Preliminary experience.
Costa DN; Kay FU; Pedrosa I; Kolski L; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Hornberger B; Xi Y; Francis F; Rofsky NM
Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e15-149.e21. PubMed ID: 27939349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional localization and targeting of prostate cancer foci with imaging and histopathologic correlation: establishing a multidisciplinary team for quality improvement.
Aminsharifi A; Gupta RT; Huang J; Polascik TJ
Curr Opin Urol; 2018 Nov; 28(6):506-511. PubMed ID: 30239416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?
Wegelin O; van Melick HHE; Hooft L; Bosch JLHR; Reitsma HB; Barentsz JO; Somford DM
Eur Urol; 2017 Apr; 71(4):517-531. PubMed ID: 27568655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy allows for equivalent cancer detection with significantly fewer needle cores in biopsy-naive men.
Yarlagadda VK; Lai WS; Gordetsky JB; Porter KK; Nix JW; Thomas JV; Rais-Bahrami S
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018; 24(3):115-120. PubMed ID: 29770762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR Imaging-Targeted Prostate Biopsies.
Sarkar S; Verma S
Radiol Clin North Am; 2018 Mar; 56(2):289-300. PubMed ID: 29420983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does the addition of targeted prostate biopsies to standard systemic biopsies influence treatment management for radiation oncologists?
Kamrava M; Hegde JV; Abgaryan N; Chang E; Le JD; Wang J; Kupelian PA; Marks LS
BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117(4):584-91. PubMed ID: 25684394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with MRI image fusion for monitoring focal therapy of prostate cancer with high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)1.
Apfelbeck M; Clevert DA; Ricke J; Stief C; Schlenker B
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 69(1-2):93-100. PubMed ID: 29660918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate focal therapy: the rule or exception?
Tay KJ
Curr Opin Urol; 2018 Nov; 28(6):512-521. PubMed ID: 30124517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatial Tracking of Targeted Prostate Biopsy Locations: Moving Towards Effective Focal Partial Prostate Gland Ablation with Improved Treatment Planning.
Sidelsky S; Setia S; Vourganti S
Curr Urol Rep; 2017 Oct; 18(12):93. PubMed ID: 29046984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy of the prostate: Quality of image fusion in a clinical setting.
Schlenker B; Apfelbeck M; Buchner A; Stief C; Clevert DA
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 70(4):433-440. PubMed ID: 30347605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Elastic Versus Rigid Image Registration in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Venderink W; de Rooij M; Sedelaar JPM; Huisman HJ; Fütterer JJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Mar; 4(2):219-227. PubMed ID: 28753777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
