179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30102636)
1. A Novel Method for the Prediction of the Pedicle Screw Stability: Regional Bone Mineral Density Around the Screw.
Ishikawa K; Toyone T; Shirahata T; Kudo Y; Matsuoka A; Maruyama H; Hayakawa C; Tani S; Sekimizu M; Tsuchiya K; Eguro T; Oshita Y; Ozawa T; Nakao Y; Sano S; Nagai T; Kanzaki K; Inagaki K
Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Nov; 31(9):E473-E480. PubMed ID: 30102636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tapping insertional torque allows prediction for better pedicle screw fixation and optimal screw size selection.
Helgeson MD; Kang DG; Lehman RA; Dmitriev AE; Luhmann SJ
Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):957-65. PubMed ID: 23602374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Regional Hounsfield unit measurement of screw trajectory for predicting pedicle screw fixation using cortical bone trajectory: a retrospective cohort study.
Matsukawa K; Abe Y; Yanai Y; Yato Y
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2018 Feb; 160(2):405-411. PubMed ID: 29260301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advantage of pedicle screw fixation directed into the apex of the sacral promontory over bicortical fixation: a biomechanical analysis.
Lehman RA; Kuklo TR; Belmont PJ; Andersen RC; Polly DW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(8):806-11. PubMed ID: 11935101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the Fixation Strength of Pedicle Screws Using Cortical Bone Trajectory: What Is the Ideal Trajectory for Optimal Fixation?
Matsukawa K; Taguchi E; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Hosogane N; Asazuma T; Nemoto K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Aug; 40(15):E873-8. PubMed ID: 26222663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Pedicle Screw Fixation Strength Among Different Transpedicular Trajectories: A Finite Element Study.
Matsukawa K; Yato Y; Hynes RA; Imabayashi H; Hosogane N; Yoshihara Y; Asazuma T; Nemoto K
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Aug; 30(7):301-307. PubMed ID: 28746125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of using tapping torque during lumbar pedicle screw insertion to predict screw fixation strength.
Matsukawa K; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Asazuma T; Chiba K
J Orthop Sci; 2020 May; 25(3):389-393. PubMed ID: 31174968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of imaging and in situ biomechanical testing in assessing pedicle screw pull-out strength.
Myers BS; Belmont PJ; Richardson WJ; Yu JR; Harper KD; Nightingale RW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Sep; 21(17):1962-8. PubMed ID: 8883195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revision pedicle screws. Bigger, longer shims--what is best?
Polly DW; Orchowski JR; Ellenbogen RG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jun; 23(12):1374-9. PubMed ID: 9654629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can insertional torque predict screw loosening and related failures? An in vivo study of pedicle screw fixation augmenting posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Okuyama K; Abe E; Suzuki T; Tamura Y; Chiba M; Sato K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Apr; 25(7):858-64. PubMed ID: 10751298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The insertional torque of a pedicle screw has a positive correlation with bone mineral density in posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation.
Lee JH; Lee JH; Park JW; Shin YH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jan; 94(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 22219254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Paravertebral foramen screw fixation for posterior cervical spine fusion: biomechanical study and description of a novel technique.
Maki S; Aramomi M; Matsuura Y; Furuya T; Ota M; Iijima Y; Saito J; Suzuki T; Mannoji C; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Koda M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):415-420. PubMed ID: 28498072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A biomechanical evaluation of three revision screw strategies for failed lateral mass fixation.
Hostin RA; Wu C; Perra JH; Polly DW; Akesen B; Wroblewski JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2415-21. PubMed ID: 18923316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Straight-forward versus anatomic trajectory technique of thoracic pedicle screw fixation: a biomechanical analysis.
Lehman RA; Polly DW; Kuklo TR; Cunningham B; Kirk KL; Belmont PJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Sep; 28(18):2058-65. PubMed ID: 14501914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DensiProbe Spine: an intraoperative measurement of bone quality in spinal instrumentation. A clinical feasibility study.
Popp AW; Schwyn R; Schiuma D; Keel MJ; Lippuner K; Benneker LM
Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1223-9. PubMed ID: 23999229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting the integrity of vertebral bone screw fixation in anterior spinal instrumentation.
Snyder BD; Zaltz I; Hall JE; Emans JB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jul; 20(14):1568-74. PubMed ID: 7570171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of the anatomic trajectory for thoracic pedicle screw salvage after failure/violation using the straight-forward technique: a biomechanical analysis.
Lehman RA; Kuklo TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Sep; 28(18):2072-7. PubMed ID: 14501916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. DensiProbe Spine: a novel instrument for intraoperative measurement of bone density in transpedicular screw fixation.
Deckelmann S; Schwyn R; Van der Pol B; Windolf M; Heini PF; Benneker LM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):607-12. PubMed ID: 20195209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Krag versus Caudad trajectory technique for pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical comparison and analysis.
Yuan Q; Han X; Han X; He D; Liu B; Tian W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Dec; 39(26 Spec No.):B27-35. PubMed ID: 25504099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative dual-energy CT for phantomless evaluation of cancellous bone mineral density of the vertebral pedicle: correlation with pedicle screw pull-out strength.
Wichmann JL; Booz C; Wesarg S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Fischer S; Lehnert T; Vogl TJ; Khan MF; Kafchitsas K
Eur Radiol; 2015 Jun; 25(6):1714-20. PubMed ID: 25481639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
