166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30104004)
1. Is it reasonable to administer pegfilgrastim on day 1 of a myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimen? A cost-utility analysis.
Billingsley CC; Cohn DE; Crim AK; Li Q; O'Malley DM; Havrilesky LJ
Cancer Treat Res Commun; 2018; 14():21-25. PubMed ID: 30104004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Febrile neutropenia hospitalization due to pegfilgrastim on-body injector failure compared to single-injection pegfilgrastim and daily injections with reference and biosimilar filgrastim: US cost simulation for lung cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
McBride A; Krendyukov A; Mathieson N; Campbell K; Balu S; Natek M; MacDonald K; Abraham I
J Med Econ; 2020 Jan; 23(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 31433700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with lymphoma: a systematic review.
Gebremariam GT; Fentie AM; Beyene K; Sander B; Gebretekle GB
BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Dec; 22(1):1600. PubMed ID: 36585648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK.
Liu Z; Doan QV; Malin J; Leonard R
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2009; 7(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 19799473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim primary prophylaxis in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy in the United States.
Lyman GH; Lalla A; Barron RL; Dubois RW
Clin Ther; 2009 May; 31(5):1092-104. PubMed ID: 19539110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis treatment strategies for febrile neutropenia in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.
Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Parthan A; Walli-Attaei M; Chandler DB; Lyman GH
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jun; 133(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 24657302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany].
Sehouli J; Goertz A; Steinle T; Dubois R; Plesnila-Frank C; Lalla A; von Minckwitz G
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Mar; 135(9):385-9. PubMed ID: 20180162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Primary vs secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim for the reduction of febrile neutropenia risk in patients receiving chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: cost-effectiveness analyses.
Hill G; Barron R; Fust K; Skornicki ME; Taylor DC; Weinstein MC; Lyman GH
J Med Econ; 2014 Jan; 17(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 24028444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A single-arm, retrospective analysis of the incidence of febrile neutropenia using same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim in patients with gastrointestinal cancers treated with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI.
Eckstrom J; Bartels T; Abraham I; Patel H; Elquza E; Scott AJ; Malangone S; Hollings J; McBride A
Support Care Cancer; 2019 Mar; 27(3):873-878. PubMed ID: 30090991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia with pegfilgrastim in docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil therapy for esophageal cancer.
Ichimura T; Nomura H; Shimizu H; Machida Y; Suzuki K
Pharmazie; 2021 Sep; 76(9):450-454. PubMed ID: 34481537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-efficiency analyses for the US of biosimilar filgrastim-sndz, reference filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and pegfilgrastim with on-body injector in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia.
McBride A; Campbell K; Bikkina M; MacDonald K; Abraham I; Balu S
J Med Econ; 2017 Oct; 20(10):1083-1093. PubMed ID: 28722494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus six days of filgrastim for preventing febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients.
Danova M; Chiroli S; Rosti G; Doan QV
Tumori; 2009; 95(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 19579869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the Hematologic Safety of Same Day Versus Standard Administration (24- to 72-Hour Delay) of Pegfilgrastim in Gynecology Oncology Patients Undergoing Cytotoxic Chemotherapy.
Billingsley CC; Jacobson SN; Crafton SM; Crim AK; Li Q; Hade EM; Cohn DE; Fowler JM; Copeland LJ; Salani R; Backes FJ; O'Malley DM
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Sep; 25(7):1331-6. PubMed ID: 26067861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prophylactic pegfilgrastim to prevent febrile neutropenia among patients receiving biweekly (Q2W) chemotherapy regimens: a systematic review of efficacy, effectiveness and safety.
Mahtani R; Crawford J; Flannery SM; Lawrence T; Schenfeld J; Gawade PL
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):621. PubMed ID: 34044798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of Pegfilgrastim and Filgrastim for the Primary Prophylactic Effect for Preventing Febrile Neutropenia in Patients Undergoing Rituximab with Dose-adjusted EPOCH Chemotherapy].
Kataoka T; Sakurashita H; Taogoshi T; Nishigakiuchi R; Murase T; Izumitani S; Saeki Y; Matsuo H
Yakugaku Zasshi; 2019; 139(4):629-633. PubMed ID: 30930398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia in lymphoma patients.
Lathia N; Isogai PK; De Angelis C; Smith TJ; Cheung M; Mittmann N; Hoch JS; Walker S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Aug; 105(15):1078-85. PubMed ID: 23873405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors on febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Wang L; Baser O; Kutikova L; Page JH; Barron R
Support Care Cancer; 2015 Nov; 23(11):3131-40. PubMed ID: 25821144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™), reference Amgen filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in febrile neutropenia primary prevention in breast cancer patients treated with neo(adjuvant) TAC: a non-interventional cohort study.
Brito M; Esteves S; André R; Isidoro M; Moreira A
Support Care Cancer; 2016 Feb; 24(2):597-603. PubMed ID: 26111956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
