692 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30104147)
1. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
Dikmans RE; Negenborn VL; Bouman MB; Winters HA; Twisk JW; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MA; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NA; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RR; Ritt MJ; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2017 Feb; 18(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 28012977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after implant-based breast reconstruction with or without acellular dermal matrix: randomized clinical trial.
Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Johansson H; Roy PG; Frisell J; Brandberg Y
BJS Open; 2020 Oct; 4(5):811-820. PubMed ID: 32762012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy With and Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Among Women With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Johansson H; Roy PG; Brandberg Y; Frisell J
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Oct; 4(10):e2127806. PubMed ID: 34596671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term cost-effectiveness of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage expander-implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
Negenborn VL; Smit JM; Dikmans REG; Winters HAH; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NAS; van Steveninck-Barends JM; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Br J Surg; 2019 Apr; 106(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 30835827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Multi Centre Canadian Acellular Dermal Matrix Trial (MCCAT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in implant-based breast reconstruction.
Zhong T; Temple-Oberle C; Hofer SO; Beber B; Semple J; Brown M; Macadam S; Lennox P; Panzarella T; McCarthy C; Baxter N;
Trials; 2013 Oct; 14():356. PubMed ID: 24165392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implant Based Breast Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrix: Safety Data From an Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial in the Setting of Breast Cancer Treatment.
Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Roy PG; Johansson H; Brandberg Y; Eriksen C; Frisell J
Ann Surg; 2019 May; 269(5):836-841. PubMed ID: 30308615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A direct comparison of porcine (Strattice™) and bovine (Surgimend™) acellular dermal matrices in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.
Ball JF; Sheena Y; Tarek Saleh DM; Forouhi P; Benyon SL; Irwin MS; Malata CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1076-1082. PubMed ID: 28624524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. BROWSE: A multicentre comparison of nine year outcomes in acellular dermal matrix based and complete submuscular implant-based immediate breast reconstruction-aesthetics, capsular contracture and patient reported outcomes.
Wilson RL; Kirwan CC; O'Donoghue JM; Linforth RA; Johnson RK; Harvey JR
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jan; 48(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 34836730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Passot-Type Immediate Breast Reconstruction Obviates the Use of Aceullular Dermal Matrix in Grades 2 and 3 Ptosis.
Rivet JJ; Day KM; Rau JF; Waldrop JL; Brzezienski MA
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jun; 82(6S Suppl 5):S394-S398. PubMed ID: 30694845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADM) in women undergoing pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction increase operative success versus non-use of ADM in the same setting? A systematic review protocol.
Cook H; Zargaran D; Glynou SP; Hamilton S; Mosahebi A
Syst Rev; 2024 Jun; 13(1):153. PubMed ID: 38849880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without biological or synthetic mesh.
Sewart E; Turner NL; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Skillman J; Whisker L; Thrush S; Barnes N; Holcombe C; Potter S;
BJS Open; 2021 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 33609398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biological Matrix-Assisted One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications.
Gao P; Bai P; Ren Y; Kong X; Wang Z; Fang Y; Wang J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Dec; 45(6):2581-2590. PubMed ID: 34350500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors of complications after direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
Negenborn VL; Dikmans REG; Bouman MB; Winters HAH; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Hommes J; Eltahir Y; Posch NAS; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ritt MJPF; Mullender MG
Br J Surg; 2018 Sep; 105(10):1305-1312. PubMed ID: 29663320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extended Submuscular Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Pectoralis-Serratus Sling and Acellular Dermal Matrix.
Kolker AR; Piccolo PP
Aesthet Surg J; 2017 Apr; 37(4):485-491. PubMed ID: 28364524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: Higher complication rate vs cosmetic benefits.
Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Leser C; Salama M; Singer CF
Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):957-964. PubMed ID: 30230119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.
Sorkin M; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Kozlow JH; Pusic AL; Wilkins EG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6):1091-1100. PubMed ID: 28806288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. One-stage immediate breast reconstruction with implants: a new option for immediate reconstruction.
Cassileth L; Kohanzadeh S; Amersi F
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 69(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 21734545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of patient outcomes between direct to implant and two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy.
Caputo GG; Vigato E; Rampino Cordaro E; Parodi PC; Governa M
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Oct; 74(10):2573-2579. PubMed ID: 33947651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Review of the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrices in Postmastectomy Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Chao AH
Plast Surg Nurs; 2015; 35(3):131-4; quiz 135-6. PubMed ID: 26313677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
