These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30105942)

  • 1. The effect of cement mantle thickness on strain energy density distribution and prediction of bone density changes around cemented acetabular component.
    Sanjay D; Mondal S; Bhutani R; Ghosh R
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2018 Sep; 232(9):912-921. PubMed ID: 30105942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone remodelling around cementless composite acetabular components: the effects of implant geometry and implant-bone interfacial conditions.
    Ghosh R; Gupta S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Apr; 32():257-269. PubMed ID: 24508712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computational assessment of the effect of polyethylene wear rate, mantle thickness, and porosity on the mechanical failure of the acetabular cement mantle.
    Coultrup OJ; Hunt C; Wroblewski BM; Taylor M
    J Orthop Res; 2010 May; 28(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 19950359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shape optimization of metal backing for cemented acetabular cup.
    Hedia HS; Abdel-Shafi AA; Fouda N
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 11086841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of interfacial crack and implant material on mixed-mode stress intensity factor and prediction of interface failure of cemented acetabular cup.
    Kumar A; Ghosh R; Kumar R
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2020 Jul; 108(5):1844-1856. PubMed ID: 31769210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Cementless socket fixation based on the "press-fit" concept in total hip joint arthroplasty].
    Morscher EW; Widmer KH; Bereiter H; Elke R; Schenk R
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combined Bone Ingrowth and Remodeling Around Uncemented Acetabular Component: A Multiscale Mechanobiology-Based Finite Element Analysis.
    Mukherjee K; Gupta S
    J Biomech Eng; 2017 Sep; 139(9):. PubMed ID: 28696483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A stress analysis of acetabular reconstruction in protrusio acetabuli.
    Crowninshield RD; Brand RA; Pedersen DR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1983 Apr; 65(4):495-9. PubMed ID: 6833325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of failure of cemented polyethylene acetabular component due to bone remodeling: A finite element study.
    Ghosh R
    J Orthop; 2016 Sep; 13(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 27408485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of geometry and abduction angle on the stresses in cemented UHMWPE acetabular cups--finite element simulations and experimental tests.
    Korhonen RK; Koistinen A; Konttinen YT; Santavirta SS; Lappalainen R
    Biomed Eng Online; 2005 May; 4():32. PubMed ID: 15904521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Femoral Head Size, Subject Weight, and Activity Level on Acetabular Cement Mantle Stress Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Del-Valle-Mojica JF; Alonso-Rasgado T; Jimenez-Cruz D; Bailey CG; Board TN
    J Orthop Res; 2019 Aug; 37(8):1771-1783. PubMed ID: 30977550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fixation of the acetabular cup in cemented total hip replacement: improving the anchorage hole profile using finite element method.
    Mootanah R; Ingle P; Dowell J; Cheah K; Shelton JC
    Technol Health Care; 2000; 8(6):343-55. PubMed ID: 11258580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The cemented all-polyethylene acetabular cup: factors affecting survival with emphasis on the integrated polyethylene spacer: an analysis of the effect of cement spacers, cement mantle thickness, and acetabular angle on the survival of total hip arthroplasty.
    Faris PM; Ritter MA; Keating EM; Thong AE; Davis KE; Meding JB
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Feb; 21(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 16520206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An axisymmetric model of acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty.
    Pedersen DR; Crowninshield RD; Brand RA; Johnston RC
    J Biomech; 1982; 15(4):305-15. PubMed ID: 7096385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stress distributions in the acetabular region--II. Effects of cement thickness and metal backing of the total hip acetabular component.
    Carter DR; Vasu R; Harris WH
    J Biomech; 1982; 15(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 7096369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A subject-specific pelvic bone model and its application to cemented acetabular replacements.
    Zhang QH; Wang JY; Lupton C; Heaton-Adegbile P; Guo ZX; Liu Q; Tong J
    J Biomech; 2010 Oct; 43(14):2722-7. PubMed ID: 20655051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress distributions in the acetabular region--I. Before and after total joint replacement.
    Vasu R; Carter DR; Harris WH
    J Biomech; 1982; 15(3):155-64. PubMed ID: 7096368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of cup outer sizes on the contact mechanics and cement fixation of cemented total hip replacements.
    Hua X; Li J; Wang L; Wilcox R; Fisher J; Jin Z
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Oct; 37(10):1008-14. PubMed ID: 26343226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A simulative biomechanical experiment on different position of none-cement acetabular components influencing the load distribution around acetabulum].
    Li D; Liu J; Li S; Fan H; Guan J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 25(1):97-100. PubMed ID: 18435266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone remodelling around uncemented metallic and ceramic acetabular components.
    Ghosh R; Mukherjee K; Gupta S
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 May; 227(5):490-502. PubMed ID: 23637259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.