These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30106395)

  • 1. Effect of Different Cavity Lining Techniques on Marginal Sealing of Class II Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro.
    Pedram P; Hooshmand T; Heidari S
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(6):895–901. PubMed ID: 30106395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of lining materials on microleakage and internal voids of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Lin TS; Chang CH; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 12797564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on Class II composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Liu JK; Chang CH; Shieh DB
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 15195731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of flowable composite lining thickness with various curing techniques on microleakage in class II composite restorations: an in vitro study.
    Reddy SN; Jayashankar DN; Nainan M; Shivanna V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 23579894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs.
    Sadeghi M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19553715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of total and selective bonding on marginal adaptation and microleakage of Class I resin composite restorations in vitro.
    Schmidlin PR; Huber T; Göhring TN; Attin T; Bindl A
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 19051855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of flowable composite and restorative technique on microleakage of class II restorations.
    Hernandes NM; Catelan A; Soares GP; Ambrosano GM; Lima DA; Marchi GM; Martins LR; Aguiar FH
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Nov; 5(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 23946230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of four lining materials in sandwich technique to reduce microleakage in class II composite resin restorations.
    Moazzami SM; Sarabi N; Hajizadeh H; Majidinia S; Li Y; Meharry MR; Shahrokh H
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):256-63. PubMed ID: 24151926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of Class II composite resin restorations with self-adhesive composite resin liners.
    Doozandeh M; Shafiei F; Mohammadi F
    Gen Dent; 2017; 65(4):41-47. PubMed ID: 28682281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer.
    Sidhu SK; Henderson LJ
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1437685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of flowable composite lining on microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations.
    Korkmaz Y; Ozel E; Attar N
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Apr; 9(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 17489480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of pre-heating resin composite on restoration microleakage.
    Wagner WC; Aksu MN; Neme AM; Linger JB; Pink FE; Walker S
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 18335736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Class II composite resin restorations using glass-ionomer liners: microleakage studies.
    Aboushala A; Kugel G; Hurley E
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 21(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 9161210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage in class II composite resin restorations: total bonding and open sandwich technique.
    Loguercio AD; Alessandra R; Mazzocco KC; Dias AL; Busato AL; Singer Jda M; Rosa P
    J Adhes Dent; 2002; 4(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 12236642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gingival microleakage of Class II resin composite restorations with fiber inserts.
    El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Eltanty A; Abbasi K; Habib N
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 17555183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.