397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30106606)
1. A Multi-Institutional Propensity Score Matched Comparison of Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Partial Nephrectomy for cT1 Posterior Tumors.
Paulucci DJ; Beksac AT; Porter J; Abaza R; Eun DD; Bhandari A; Hemal AK; Badani KK
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Jan; 29(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 30106606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Posterior Tumors Through a Retroperitoneal Approach Offers Decreased Length of Stay Compared with the Transperitoneal Approach: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.
Maurice MJ; Kaouk JH; Ramirez D; Bhayani SB; Allaf ME; Rogers CG; Stifelman MD
J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):158-162. PubMed ID: 27927035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with Obesity.
Okhawere KE; Rich JM; Beksac AT; Zuluaga L; Saini I; Ucpinar B; Levieddin J; Joel IT; Deluxe A; Stifelman MD; Crivellaro S; Abaza R; Eun DD; Bhandari A; Hemal AK; Porter J; Mansour A; Pierorazio PM; Zaytoun O; Badani KK
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2023 Sep; 33(9):835-840. PubMed ID: 37339434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: matched-pair comparisons by nephrometry scores.
Choo SH; Lee SY; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Choi HY; Seo SI
World J Urol; 2014 Dec; 32(6):1523-9. PubMed ID: 24817141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retroperitoneal Robot-Assisted Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy for cT1 Renal Tumors: A Matched-Pair Comparison of Perioperative and Early Oncological Outcomes.
Borghesi M; Schiavina R; Chessa F; Bianchi L; La Manna G; Porreca A; Brunocilla E
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Apr; 16(2):e391-e396. PubMed ID: 29074284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparisons of surgical outcomes between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for lateral renal tumors: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis.
Takagi T; Yoshida K; Kondo T; Kobayashi H; Iizuka J; Okumi M; Ishida H; Tanabe K
J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 32358741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of perioperative and functional outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy for cT1a vs cT1b renal masses.
Reynolds CR; Delto JC; Paulucci DJ; Weinstein C; Badani K; Eun D; Abaza R; Porter J; Bhandari A; Hemal AK
BJU Int; 2017 Dec; 120(6):842-847. PubMed ID: 28710786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is Off Clamp Always Beneficial During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy? A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Clamp Technique in Patients with Two Kidneys.
Rosen DC; Paulucci DJ; Abaza R; Eun DD; Bhandari A; Hemal AK; Badani KK
J Endourol; 2017 Nov; 31(11):1176-1182. PubMed ID: 28954531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic and open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: a matched-pair comparison with a long-term follow-up.
Wang Y; Shao J; Ma X; Du Q; Gong H; Zhang X
World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 27194142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of outcomes between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal robotic assisted partial nephrectomy in patients with completely endophytic kidney tumors.
Okhawere KE; Rich JM; Ucpinar B; Beksac AT; Saini I; Deluxe A; Zuluaga L; Eun DD; Bhandari A; Hemal AK; Porter J; Abaza R; Mansour A; Stifelman MD; Crivellaro S; Pierorazio PM; Zaytoun O; Badani KK
Urol Oncol; 2023 Feb; 41(2):111.e1-111.e6. PubMed ID: 36528472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trans-peritoneal vs. retroperitoneal robotic assisted partial nephrectomy in posterior renal tumours: need for a risk-stratified patient individualised approach. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
McLean A; Mukherjee A; Phukan C; Veeratterapillay R; Soomro N; Somani B; Rai BP
J Robot Surg; 2020 Feb; 14(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 31089965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postoperative outcomes of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a propensity-score matched comparison focused on patient mobilization, return to bowel function, and pain.
Bertolo R; Ditonno F; Veccia A; De Marco V; Migliorini F; Porcaro AB; Rizzetto R; Cerruto MA; Autorino R; Antonelli A;
J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):96. PubMed ID: 38413473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair, bicenter analysis with cost comparison using time-driven activity-based costing.
Laviana AA; Tan HJ; Hu JC; Weizer AZ; Chang SS; Barocas DA
Curr Opin Urol; 2018 Mar; 28(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 29278580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Off-clamp vs on-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy: Perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes from a propensity-score matching between two high-volume centers.
Bertolo R; Simone G; Garisto J; Nakhoul G; Armanyous S; Agudelo J; Costantini M; Tuderti G; Gallucci M; Kaouk J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1232-1237. PubMed ID: 30553632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy is a safe and effective approach for patients with T1b or greater renal tumors.
Vargo EH; Vetter JM; Kim EH; Bhayani S; Figenshau RS
J Robot Surg; 2024 Jun; 18(1):244. PubMed ID: 38847899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nephrometry score matched robotic vs. laparoscopic vs. open partial nephrectomy.
Banapour P; Abdelsayed GA; Bider-Canfield Z; Elliott PA; Kilday PS; Chien GW
J Robot Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(4):679-685. PubMed ID: 29556868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Single-port Robotic-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: An Analysis from the Single Port Advanced Research Consortium.
Rich JM; Okhawere KE; Nguyen C; Ucpinar B; Zuluaga L; Razdan S; Saini I; Tuna Beksac A; Nguyen J; Calvo RS; Ahmed M; Mehrazin R; Abaza R; Stifelman MD; Kaouk J; Crivellaro S; Badani KK
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Nov; 9(6):1059-1064. PubMed ID: 37394396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: comparison of perioperative outcomes and functional follow-up in a large multi-institutional cohort (The RECORD 2 Project).
Porpiglia F; Mari A; Amparore D; Fiori C; Antonelli A; Artibani W; Bove P; Brunocilla E; Capitanio U; Da Pozzo L; Di Maida F; Gontero P; Longo N; Marra G; Rocco B; Schiavina R; Simeone C; Siracusano S; Tellini R; Terrone C; Villari D; Ficarra V; Carini M; Minervini A;
Surg Endosc; 2021 Aug; 35(8):4295-4304. PubMed ID: 32856156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of intraoperative parameters and perioperative complications of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: support for a retroperitoneal approach in selected patients.
Kieran K; Montgomery JS; Daignault S; Roberts WW; Wolf JS
J Endourol; 2007 Jul; 21(7):754-9. PubMed ID: 17705765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. R-LESS partial nephrectomy trifecta outcome is inferior to multiport robotic partial nephrectomy: comparative analysis.
Komninos C; Shin TY; Tuliao P; Yoon YE; Koo KC; Chang CH; Kim SW; Ha JY; Han WK; Rha KH
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):512-7. PubMed ID: 24275311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
