163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30106609)
1. Does Extended PET Acquisition in PET/MRI Rectal Cancer Staging Improve Results?
Bailey JJ; Jordan EJ; Burke C; Ohliger MA; Wang ZJ; Van Loon K; Varma MG; Hope TA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 211(4):896-900. PubMed ID: 30106609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PET/MRI and PET/CT hybrid imaging of rectal cancer - description and initial observations from the RECTOPET (REctal Cancer trial on PET/MRI/CT) study.
Rutegård MK; Båtsman M; Axelsson J; Brynolfsson P; Brännström F; Rutegård J; Ljuslinder I; Blomqvist L; Palmqvist R; Rutegård M; Riklund K
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Jul; 19(1):52. PubMed ID: 31337428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of PET/MRI for imaging rectal cancer.
Hope TA; Kassam Z; Loening A; McNamara MM; Paspulati R
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Nov; 44(11):3559-3568. PubMed ID: 31201431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic performance of
Hotta M; Minamimoto R; Yano H; Gohda Y; Shuno Y
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Jan; 18(1):4. PubMed ID: 29378659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0T high-resolution MRI for assessment mesorectal lymph node metastases in patients with rectal cancer].
Chen Y; Yang X; Lu B; Xiao X; Zhuang X; Yu S
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 21(7):786-792. PubMed ID: 30051447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography-magnetic resonance hybrid imaging: An emerging tool for staging of cancer of the uterine cervix.
Nazir A; Matthews R; Chimpiri AR; Henretta M; Varughese J; Franceschi D
World J Nucl Med; 2021; 20(2):150-155. PubMed ID: 34321967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial Staging of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer and Regional Lymph Nodes: Comparison of Diffusion-Weighted MRI With 18F-FDG-PET/CT.
Cerny M; Dunet V; Prior JO; Hahnloser D; Wagner AD; Meuli RA; Schmidt S
Clin Nucl Med; 2016 Apr; 41(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 26828149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rectal cancer: a methodological approach to matching PET/MRI to histopathology.
Rutegård MK; Båtsman M; Blomqvist L; Rutegård M; Axelsson J; Ljuslinder I; Rutegård J; Palmqvist R; Brännström F; Brynolfsson P; Riklund K
Cancer Imaging; 2020 Oct; 20(1):80. PubMed ID: 33129352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simultaneous whole-body ¹⁸F-FDG PET-MRI in primary staging of breast cancer: a pilot study.
Taneja S; Jena A; Goel R; Sarin R; Kaul S
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Dec; 83(12):2231-2239. PubMed ID: 25282709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simultaneous positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging for whole-body staging in patients with recurrent gynecological malignancies of the pelvis: a comparison to whole-body magnetic resonance imaging alone.
Grueneisen J; Beiderwellen K; Heusch P; Gratz M; Schulze-Hagen A; Heubner M; Kinner S; Forsting M; Lauenstein T; Ruhlmann V; Umutlu L
Invest Radiol; 2014 Dec; 49(12):808-15. PubMed ID: 25010207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nodal staging of rectal cancer: high-resolution pelvic MRI versus ¹⁸F-FDGPET/CT.
Kim DJ; Kim JH; Ryu YH; Jeon TJ; Yu JS; Chung JJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(5):531-4. PubMed ID: 21926843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Added value of dedicated axillary hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI for improved axillary nodal staging in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients: a feasibility study.
van Nijnatten TJA; Goorts B; Vöö S; de Boer M; Kooreman LFS; Heuts EM; Wildberger JE; Mottaghy FM; Lobbes MBI; Smidt ML
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Feb; 45(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 28905091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adverse features on rectal MRI identify a high-risk group that may benefit from more intensive preoperative staging and treatment.
Hunter CJ; Garant A; Vuong T; Artho G; Lisbona R; Tekkis P; Abulafi M; Brown G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):1199-205. PubMed ID: 21913017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved staging with pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography in low rectal cancer.
Gearhart SL; Frassica D; Rosen R; Choti M; Schulick R; Wahl R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 16485158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of hybrid FDG PET/MRI compared with PET/CT in colorectal cancer staging and restaging: a pilot study.
Paspulati RM; Partovi S; Herrmann KA; Krishnamurthi S; Delaney CP; Nguyen NC
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Aug; 40(6):1415-25. PubMed ID: 26112492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrated PET/MRI for whole-body staging of patients with primary cervical cancer: preliminary results.
Grueneisen J; Schaarschmidt BM; Heubner M; Aktas B; Kinner S; Forsting M; Lauenstein T; Ruhlmann V; Umutlu L
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Nov; 42(12):1814-24. PubMed ID: 26199113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Assessment of lymph node status in rectal cancer by imaging].
Wang Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 19(6):630-3. PubMed ID: 27353097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of FDG PET/CT and MRI in lymph node staging of endometrial cancer.
Kim HJ; Cho A; Yun M; Kim YT; Kang WJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 26546334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
Ishihara S; Kawai K; Tanaka T; Kiyomatsu T; Hata K; Nozawa H; Morikawa T; Watanabe T
Tech Coloproctol; 2018 May; 22(5):347-354. PubMed ID: 29623475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
