BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30107046)

  • 1. Heritability, selection, and the response to selection in the presence of phenotypic measurement error: Effects, cures, and the role of repeated measurements.
    Ponzi E; Keller LF; Bonnet T; Muff S
    Evolution; 2018 Oct; 72(10):1992-2004. PubMed ID: 30107046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An exact form of the breeder's equation for the evolution of a quantitative trait under natural selection.
    Heywood JS
    Evolution; 2005 Nov; 59(11):2287-98. PubMed ID: 16396170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The danger of applying the breeder's equation in observational studies of natural populations.
    Morrissey MB; Kruuk LE; Wilson AJ
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Nov; 23(11):2277-88. PubMed ID: 20831731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing strengths of directional selection: how strong is strong?
    Hereford J; Hansen TF; Houle D
    Evolution; 2004 Oct; 58(10):2133-43. PubMed ID: 15562680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bigger Is Fitter? Quantitative Genetic Decomposition of Selection Reveals an Adaptive Evolutionary Decline of Body Mass in a Wild Rodent Population.
    Bonnet T; Wandeler P; Camenisch G; Postma E
    PLoS Biol; 2017 Jan; 15(1):e1002592. PubMed ID: 28125583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evolution of quantitative traits in the wild: mind the ecology.
    Pemberton JM
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2010 Aug; 365(1552):2431-8. PubMed ID: 20643732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing for biases in selection on avian reproductive traits and partitioning direct and indirect selection using quantitative genetic models.
    Reed TE; Gienapp P; Visser ME
    Evolution; 2016 Oct; 70(10):2211-2225. PubMed ID: 27464856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating uncertainty in multivariate responses to selection.
    Stinchcombe JR; Simonsen AK; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2014 Apr; 68(4):1188-96. PubMed ID: 24274331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Most published selection gradients are underestimated: Why this is and how to fix it.
    Dingemanse NJ; Araya-Ajoy YG; Westneat DF
    Evolution; 2021 Apr; 75(4):806-818. PubMed ID: 33621355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A method to predict the response to directional selection using a Kalman filter.
    Milocco L; Salazar-Ciudad I
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jul; 119(28):e2117916119. PubMed ID: 35867739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The 'algebra of evolution': the Robertson-Price identity and viability selection for body mass in a wild bird population.
    Hajduk GK; Walling CA; Cockburn A; Kruuk LEB
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Apr; 375(1797):20190359. PubMed ID: 32146880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmental coupling of selection and heritability limits evolution.
    Wilson AJ; Pemberton JM; Pilkington JG; Coltman DW; Mifsud DV; Clutton-Brock TH; Kruuk LE
    PLoS Biol; 2006 Jul; 4(7):e216. PubMed ID: 16756391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolutionary potential of morphological traits across different life-history stages.
    Bourret A; BĂ©lisle M; Pelletier F; Garant D
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Mar; 30(3):616-626. PubMed ID: 28000316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cryptic selection forces and dynamic heritability in generalized phenotypic evolution.
    Gilpin W; Feldman MW
    Theor Popul Biol; 2019 Feb; 125():20-29. PubMed ID: 30528351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of inaccurate parameter estimates on genetic response to marker-assisted selection in an outbred population.
    Spelman RJ; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 Dec; 80(12):3399-410. PubMed ID: 9436122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to use molecular marker data to measure evolutionary parameters in wild populations.
    Garant D; Kruuk LE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jun; 14(7):1843-59. PubMed ID: 15910310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evolution of the environmental component of the phenotypic variance: stabilizing selection in changing environments and the cost of homogeneity.
    Zhang XS; Hill WG
    Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1237-44. PubMed ID: 16050100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why are estimates of the strength and direction of natural selection from wild populations not congruent with observed rates of phenotypic change?
    Brookfield JF
    Bioessays; 2016 Sep; 38(9):927-34. PubMed ID: 27401716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic evaluation with major genes and polygenic inheritance when some animals are not genotyped using gene content multiple-trait BLUP.
    Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():89. PubMed ID: 26576649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The prediction of adaptive evolution: empirical application of the secondary theorem of selection and comparison to the breeder's equation.
    Morrissey MB; Parker DJ; Korsten P; Pemberton JM; Kruuk LE; Wilson AJ
    Evolution; 2012 Aug; 66(8):2399-410. PubMed ID: 22834740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.