These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30107363)

  • 1. Synthetic osmotic dilators in the induction of labour-An international multicentre observational study.
    Gupta J; Chodankar R; Baev O; Bahlmann F; Brega E; Gala A; Hellmeyer L; Hruban L; Maier J; Mehta P; Murthy A; Ritter M; Saad A; Shmakov R; Suneja A; Zahumensky J; Gdovinova D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Oct; 229():70-75. PubMed ID: 30107363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Synthetic osmotic dilators for cervical preparation prior to abortion-An international multicentre observational study.
    Chodankar R; Gupta J; Gdovinova D; Bovo MJ; Hanacek J; Kan N; Roizin J; Tyutyunnik V
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Sep; 228():249-254. PubMed ID: 30032065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictors of vaginal delivery after cervical ripening using a synthetic osmotic dilator.
    Saad AF; Gupta J; Hruban L; Hankins GD; Saade GR
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Mar; 246():160-164. PubMed ID: 32028144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Induction of labor in patients with an unfavorable cervix after a cesarean using an osmotic dilator versus vaginal prostaglandin.
    Maier JT; Metz M; Watermann N; Li L; Schalinski E; Gauger U; Rath W; Hellmeyer L
    J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 28672756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical methods for induction of labour.
    Jozwiak M; Bloemenkamp KW; Kelly AJ; Mol BW; Irion O; Boulvain M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Mar; (3):CD001233. PubMed ID: 22419277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison between labor induction with only Dilapan-S and a combination of mifepristone and Dilapan-S in nulliparous women: a prospective pilot study.
    Baev OR; Babich DA; Prikhodko AM; Tysyachniy OV; Sukhikh GT
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Sep; 34(17):2832-2837. PubMed ID: 31570028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preinduction cervical ripening: prostaglandin E2 gel vs hygroscopic mechanical dilator.
    Chua S; Arulkumaran S; Vanaja K; Ratnam SS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Apr; 23(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 9158305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective pilot study of Dilapan-S compared with Propess for induction of labour at 41+ weeks in nulliparous pregnancy.
    Crosby DA; O'Reilly C; McHale H; McAuliffe FM; Mahony R
    Ir J Med Sci; 2018 Aug; 187(3):693-699. PubMed ID: 29270855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical ripening after cesarean section: a prospective dual center study comparing a mechanical osmotic dilator vs. prostaglandin E2.
    Koenigbauer JT; Schalinski E; Jarchau U; Gauger U; Brandt K; Klaucke S; Scharf JP; Rath W; Hellmeyer L
    J Perinat Med; 2021 Sep; 49(7):797-805. PubMed ID: 34333894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomised open-label trial to assess outpatient induction of labour (HOMEIND) and compare efficacy of Propess vs Dilapan-S® for induction of labour at 39 weeks' gestation in normal risk nulliparous women: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Nicholson SM; Smith O; Hatt S; Molphy Z; Dicker P; Flood K; Malone F
    Trials; 2023 Feb; 24(1):135. PubMed ID: 36814336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical methods for induction of labour.
    Boulvain M; Kelly A; Lohse C; Stan C; Irion O
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (4):CD001233. PubMed ID: 11687101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized controlled trial of Dilapan-S vs Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening (DILAFOL trial).
    Saad AF; Villarreal J; Eid J; Spencer N; Ellis V; Hankins GD; Saade GR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):275.e1-275.e9. PubMed ID: 30790569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of three preinduction cervical priming methods: prostaglandin E2 gel, Dilapan S rods and Estradiol gel.
    Roztocil A; Pilka L; Jelínek J; Koudelka M; Miklica J
    Ceska Gynekol; 1998 Feb; 63(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 9650373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing the efficacy of dilapan with extra-amniotic saline infusion and oral misoprostol for cervical ripening in term pregnancies.
    Kashanian M; Eshraghi N; Sheikhansari N; Eshraghi N
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):5616-5620. PubMed ID: 33622151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the efficacy of outpatient use of isosorbide mononitrate on cervical ripening in pregnant women with unfavourable cervix.
    Kashanian M; Jangjoo S; Sheikhansari N; KaramiAbd T
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Aug; 41(6):876-880. PubMed ID: 33225782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized trial of synthetic osmotic cervical dilator for induction of labor vs dinoprostone vaginal insert.
    Gupta JK; Maher A; Stubbs C; Brocklehurst P; Daniels JP; Hardy P;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Jul; 4(4):100628. PubMed ID: 35358740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes with same-day cervical preparation with Dilapan-S osmotic dilators and vaginal misoprostol before dilatation and evacuation at 18 to 21+6 weeks' gestation.
    Lyus R; Lohr PA; Taylor J; Morroni C
    Contraception; 2013 Jan; 87(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 22898362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Synthetic osmotic dilators (Dilapan-S) or dinoprostone vaginal inserts (Propess) for inpatient induction of labour: A UK cost-consequence model.
    Walker KF; Zaher S; Torrejon Torres R; Saunders SJ; Saunders R; Gupta JK
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Nov; 278():72-76. PubMed ID: 36116393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sonoelastography for the comparative assessment of cervical maturation after different approaches to cervical preparation ahead of labor induction.
    Pekarev OG; Brega ES; Gus AI; Lunkov SS; Dikke GB; Kochev DM; Sukhikh GT
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 May; 35(10):1865-1871. PubMed ID: 32460594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized trial of Dilapan and Laminaria as cervical ripening agents before induction of labor.
    Blumenthal PD; Ramanauskas R
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Mar; 75(3 Pt 1):365-8. PubMed ID: 2406658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.