527 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30107559)
1. The Difference in Surgical Site Infection Rates Between Open and Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Pathology: A Retrospective Single Center Experience of 1442 Cases.
Mueller K; Zhao D; Johnson O; Sandhu FA; Voyadzis JM
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2019 Jun; 16(6):750-755. PubMed ID: 30107559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: one surgeon's learning curve.
Nandyala SV; Fineberg SJ; Pelton M; Singh K
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1460-5. PubMed ID: 24290313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mid-term clinical results of minimally invasive decompression and posterolateral fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws versus conventional approach for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis.
Kotani Y; Abumi K; Ito M; Sudo H; Abe Y; Minami A
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21(6):1171-7. PubMed ID: 22173610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.
Wang MY; Vasudevan R; Mindea SA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 25303619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive Decompression.
Schöller K; Alimi M; Cong GT; Christos P; Härtl R
Neurosurgery; 2017 Mar; 80(3):355-367. PubMed ID: 28362963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does minimally invasive spine surgery improve outcomes in the obese population? A retrospective review of 1442 degenerative lumbar spine surgeries.
Carroll AH; Dowlati E; Molina E; Zhao D; Altshuler M; Mueller KB; Sandhu FA; Voyadzis JM
J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Jul; 35(4):460-470. PubMed ID: 34271544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E13. PubMed ID: 31042655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: Comparison Between Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
Kim JY; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
World Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 84(5):1284-93. PubMed ID: 26072461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Degenerative Spine Disorders for Elderly Patients: Experiences from a Single Institution.
Yolcu YU; Helal A; Alexander AY; Bhatti AU; Alvi MA; Abode-Iyamah K; Bydon M
World Neurosurg; 2021 Feb; 146():e1262-e1269. PubMed ID: 33276177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery in the Elderly: Does It Make Sense?
Shamji MF; Goldstein CL; Wang M; Uribe JS; Fehlings MG
Neurosurgery; 2015 Oct; 77 Suppl 4():S108-15. PubMed ID: 26378348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perioperative complications related to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion: evaluation of 204 operations on lumbar instability at single center.
Wang J; Zhou Y
Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2078-84. PubMed ID: 24361997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical site infection rates after minimally invasive spinal surgery.
O'Toole JE; Eichholz KM; Fessler RG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Oct; 11(4):471-6. PubMed ID: 19929344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes in cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis more than 5 years after treatment with minimally invasive decompression: examination of pre- and postoperative slippage, intervertebral disc changes, and clinical results.
Mori G; Mikami Y; Arai Y; Ikeda T; Nagae M; Tonomura H; Takatori R; Sawada K; Fujiwara H; Kubo T
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):367-74. PubMed ID: 26613282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity.
Kelleher MO; Timlin M; Persaud O; Rampersaud YR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E981-7. PubMed ID: 20386501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
