These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30107767)

  • 1. Network meta-analysis in health care decision making.
    Rochwerg B; Brignardello-Petersen R; Guyatt G
    Med J Aust; 2018 Aug; 209(4):151-154. PubMed ID: 30107767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research.
    Roever L; Biondi-Zoccai G
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 106(4):333-7. PubMed ID: 27142793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing interventions with network meta-analysis.
    Bagg MK; Salanti G; McAuley JH
    J Physiother; 2018 Apr; 64(2):128-132. PubMed ID: 29661376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: Valuable pieces of the clinical decision-making puzzle.
    Szekeres M; Valdes K
    J Hand Ther; 2019; 32(2):139-140. PubMed ID: 31171083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid methods including network meta-analysis to produce evidence in clinical decision support: a decision analysis.
    Eiring Ø; Brurberg KG; Nytrøen K; Nylenna M
    Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):168. PubMed ID: 30342549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analysis: mistake or milestone in medicine?
    Foroutan F; Guyatt G; Alba AC; Ross H
    Heart; 2018 Oct; 104(19):1559-1561. PubMed ID: 29602884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Network meta-analysis, a new statistical technique at urologists' disposal to improve decision making.
    Garcia-Perdomo HA
    Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(3):422-428. PubMed ID: 29792649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies identifies and ranks the optimal diagnostic tests and thresholds for health care policy and decision-making.
    Owen RK; Cooper NJ; Quinn TJ; Lees R; Sutton AJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():64-74. PubMed ID: 29548843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continuously updated network meta-analysis and statistical monitoring for timely decision-making.
    Nikolakopoulou A; Mavridis D; Egger M; Salanti G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1312-1330. PubMed ID: 27587588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Network meta-analysis: an introduction for pharmacists.
    Xu Y; Amiche MA; Tadrous M
    Int J Clin Pharm; 2018 Oct; 40(5):942-947. PubMed ID: 29785685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can we use levels of evidence to make a decision?
    Harvey E
    Can J Surg; 2020 Feb; 63(1):E86. PubMed ID: 32103654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using decision thresholds for ranking treatments in network meta-analysis results in more informative rankings.
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Johnston BC; Jadad AR; Tomlinson G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 98():62-69. PubMed ID: 29454030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A systematic survey shows that reporting and handling of missing outcome data in networks of interventions is poor.
    Spineli LM; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Schünemann HJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):115. PubMed ID: 30355280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Transplantation: Challenges and Pitfalls?
    Wong G; Sharma A; Teixeira-Pinto A; Howell M
    Transplantation; 2018 Sep; 102(9):1415-1418. PubMed ID: 30124633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochrane systematic reviews: contributions and perspectives.
    Boutron I
    Joint Bone Spine; 2019 May; 86(3):289-291. PubMed ID: 30273659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Network meta-analysis explained.
    Dias S; Caldwell DM
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2019 Jan; 104(1):F8-F12. PubMed ID: 30425115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adverse events associated with human papillomavirus vaccines: a protocol for systematic review with network meta-analysis incorporating all randomised controlled trials comparing with placebo, adjuvants and other vaccines.
    Takeuchi J; Noma H; Sakanishi Y; Kawamura T
    BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e026924. PubMed ID: 31439596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Translating Experimental Evidence Into Clinical Decision Making.
    Healy E; Wasfy JH
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Jan; 20(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 30744829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use and value of systematic reviews in English local authority public health: a qualitative study.
    South E; Lorenc T
    BMC Public Health; 2020 Jul; 20(1):1100. PubMed ID: 32660533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A pulmonologist's guide to understanding network meta-analysis.
    Dobler CC; Wilson ME; Murad MH
    Eur Respir J; 2018 Jul; 52(1):. PubMed ID: 29973354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.