These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30107773)

  • 1. Potential solutions to improve the governance of multicentre health services research.
    Evans SM; Zalcberg JR; Scarborough R
    Med J Aust; 2018 Aug; 209(4):187. PubMed ID: 30107773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Potential solutions to improve the governance of multicentre health services research.
    Clay-Williams R; Taylor N; Braithwaite J
    Med J Aust; 2018 Mar; 208(4):152-154. PubMed ID: 29490214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical review of health service research in the UK: implications for nursing.
    Tod AM; Nicolson P; Allmark P
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 Nov; 40(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 12421396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The other face of research governance.
    Jones AM; Bamford B
    BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7460):280-1. PubMed ID: 15284155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research ethics committees.
    BMJ; 1990 Mar; 300(6724):607-8. PubMed ID: 2108763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical approval for national studies in Ireland: an illustration of current challenges.
    Smith M; Doyle F; McGee HM; De La Harpe D
    Ir J Med Sci; 2004; 173(2):72-4. PubMed ID: 15540705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ethical governance and regulation of student projects: a draft proposal.
    Doyal L
    Bull Med Ethics; 2004 Nov; (203):8-11. PubMed ID: 15816101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do all services provided as part of a clinical trial require research ethics and governance review?
    Kenner J; Zalcberg JR
    Intern Med J; 2017 Oct; 47(10):1197-1199. PubMed ID: 28994255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study.
    Tully J; Ninis N; Booy R; Viner R
    BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1179-82. PubMed ID: 10784541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethical review of research on human subjects at Unilever: reflections on governance.
    Sheehan M; Marti V; Roberts T
    Bioethics; 2014 Jul; 28(6):284-92. PubMed ID: 23841908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guidelines for local research ethics committees: distinguishing between patient and population research in the Multicentre Research Project.
    Benster R; Pollock AM
    Public Health; 1993 Jan; 107(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 8475241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reconsidering 'ethics' and 'quality' in healthcare research: the case for an iterative ethical paradigm.
    Stevenson FA; Gibson W; Pelletier C; Chrysikou V; Park S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 May; 16():21. PubMed ID: 25952678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hospital ethics committees in practice: the case review function of four HECs in Connecticut.
    van der Heide IG
    HEC Forum; 1994 Mar; 6(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 10134307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Module five: implementation of ethics review.
    Dhai A
    Dev World Bioeth; 2005 Mar; 5(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 15748179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethical issues: the multi-centre low-risk ethics/governance review process and AMOSS.
    Vaughan G; Pollock W; Peek MJ; Knight M; Ellwood D; Homer CS; Pulver LJ; McLintock C; Ho MT; Sullivan EA
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Apr; 52(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 22188386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Responses of local research ethics committees to a study with approval from a multicentre research ethics committee.
    Lux AL; Edwards SW; Osborne JP
    BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1182-3. PubMed ID: 10784542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inconsistencies and time delays in site-specific research approvals hinder collaborative clinical research in Australia.
    White VM; Bibby H; Green M; Anazodo A; Nicholls W; Pinkerton R; Phillips M; Harrup R; Osborn M; Orme LM; Conyers R; Thompson K; Coory M
    Intern Med J; 2016 Sep; 46(9):1023-9. PubMed ID: 27396473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to distinguish research from quality improvement.
    Cooper JA; McNair L
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):209-10. PubMed ID: 25819760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What Makes Health Systems Research in Developing Countries Ethical? Application of the Emanuel Framework for Clinical Research to Health Systems Research.
    Wassenaar D; Rattani A
    Dev World Bioeth; 2016 Dec; 16(3):133-139. PubMed ID: 26871547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm?
    Nelson CH; McPherson DH
    NCEHR Commun; 2004; 12(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15460563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.