269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30109301)
1. CBCT vs other imaging modalities to assess peri-implant bone and diagnose complications: a systematic review.
Jacobs R; Vranckx M; Vanderstuyft T; Quirynen M; Salmon B
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11 Suppl 1():77-92. PubMed ID: 30109301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative analysis of imaging techniques for diagnostic accuracy of peri-implant bone defects: a meta-analysis.
Bohner LOL; Mukai E; Oderich E; Porporatti AL; Pacheco-Pereira C; Tortamano P; De Luca Canto G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Oct; 124(4):432-440.e5. PubMed ID: 28743664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology.
Ritter L; Elger MC; Rothamel D; Fienitz T; Zinser M; Schwarz F; Zöller JE
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT versus intraoral imaging for assessment of peri-implant bone defects.
Song D; Shujaat S; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Huang Y; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Feb; 21(1):23. PubMed ID: 33568085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review.
Pelekos G; Acharya A; Tonetti MS; Bornstein MM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 May; 29(5):443-464. PubMed ID: 29578266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of peri-implant bone defects by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): an integrative review.
Costa JA; Mendes JM; Salazar F; Pacheco JJ; Rompante P; Câmara MI
Oral Radiol; 2023 Jul; 39(3):455-466. PubMed ID: 37058184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: A systematic review.
Fokas G; Vaughn VM; Scarfe WC; Bornstein MM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():393-415. PubMed ID: 30328204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects.
Dave M; Davies J; Wilson R; Palmer R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):671-8. PubMed ID: 22458628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Zirconia implants interfere with the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images even with artifact reduction, a pilot study.
Kuusisto N; Abushahba F; Syrjänen S; Huumonen S; Vallittu P; Närhi T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230252. PubMed ID: 37641961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Higher Resolution in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Is Accompanied by Improved Bone Detection in Peri-implant Bone Despite Metal Artifact Presence.
Kerkfeld V; Meyer U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1331-1338. PubMed ID: 30427964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant and periodontal defects using a cone beam CT system with and without the application of metal artefact reduction mode.
Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Eren H; Yüksel S; Paksoy CS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20130176. PubMed ID: 23956236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cone beam computed tomography artefacts around dental implants with different materials influencing the detection of peri-implant bone defects.
Schriber M; Yeung AWK; Suter VGA; Buser D; Leung YY; Bornstein MM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jul; 31(7):595-606. PubMed ID: 32147872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and accuracy of intraoral radiography, cone beam CT, and dental MRI for evaluation of peri-implant bone lesions at zirconia implants - an ex vivo feasibility study.
Miotk N; Schwindling FS; Zidan M; Juerchott A; Rammelsberg P; Hosseini Z; Nittka M; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Hilgenfeld T
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104422. PubMed ID: 36649822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fate of the buccal bone at implants placed early, delayed, or late after tooth extraction analyzed by cone beam CT: 10-year results from a randomized, controlled, clinical study.
Schropp L; Wenzel A; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 May; 26(5):492-500. PubMed ID: 24890861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study.
Nomier AS; Gaweesh YSE; Taalab MR; El Sadat SA
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 36528573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CBCT for evaluation of peri-implant bone lesions.
Schwindling FS; Hilgenfeld T; Weber D; Kosinski MA; Rammelsberg P; Tasaka A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1200-1208. PubMed ID: 31505065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Impact of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Exposure Parameters on Peri-Implant Artifacts: A Literature Review.
Sawicki P; Zawadzki PJ; Regulski P
Cureus; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e23035. PubMed ID: 35419219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of Osseointegration in Implants using Digital Orthopantomogram and Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Chopra A; Mhapuskar AA; Marathe S; Nisa SU; Thopte S; Saddiwal R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):953-957. PubMed ID: 27965508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
