151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30111916)
21. A comparative study to correlate between clinically and radiographically determined sagittal condylar guidance in participants with different skeletal relationships.
Singh S; Das S; Bhattacharyya J; Ghosh S; Goel P; Dutta K
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2017; 17(2):175-182. PubMed ID: 28584419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A systematic review and meta-analysis of accuracy between protrusive interocclusal record and horizontal condylar guidance angle recording methods in dentulous patients.
Potdukhe SS; Iyer JM; Nadgere JB
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2024 Jan; 24(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 38263553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from a clinical method and with cone beam computed tomography in dentate individuals.
Das A; Muddugangadhar BC; Mawani DP; Mukhopadhyay A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):753-757. PubMed ID: 32423552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Age changes in horizontal condylar angle: a clinical and cephalometric study.
Sreelal T; Janardanan K; Nair AS; Nair AS
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2013 Jun; 13(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 24431719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Correlation between sagittal condylar guidance angles obtained using radiographic and protrusive occlusal record methods.
Kwon OK; Yang SW; Kim JH
J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 9(4):302-307. PubMed ID: 28874998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of Hanau's formula in determination of lateral condylar guidance: A clinical research study.
Bhawsar SV; Marathe AS; Ansari SA
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2015; 15(4):326-30. PubMed ID: 26929535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A clinical study of the variation in horizontal condylar guidance obtained by using three anterior points of reference and two different articulator systems.
Prajapati P; Sethuraman R; Naveen YG; Patel J
Contemp Clin Dent; 2013 Apr; 4(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 24015003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance angles using computerized pantographic tracings, protrusive interocclusal records, and 3D-CBCT imaging techniques for oral rehabilitation.
Naqash TA; Chaturvedi S; Yaqoob A; Saquib S; Addas MK; Alfarsi M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Apr; 23(4):550-554. PubMed ID: 32246664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of Sagittal Inclination of Occlusal Plane and Horizontal Condylar Guidance Using Various Anterior Reference Points on Arcon and Nonarcon Articulators.
Palaskar JN; Joshi NP; Hindocha AD; Gunjal AP; Balsaraf KD
Contemp Clin Dent; 2022; 13(3):255-260. PubMed ID: 36213845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of condylar guidance setting obtained from a wax record versus an extraoral tracing: a pilot study.
dos Santos J; Nelson S; Nowlin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12589287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Comparative Evaluation of Lateral Condylar Guidance by Clinical and Radiographic Methods - Hanau's Formula Revisited.
Praveena K; Ajay R; Devaki V; Balu K; Preethisuganya S; Menaga V
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S537-S541. PubMed ID: 34447149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative clinical investigation of horizontal condylar inclination using the JMA electronic recording system and a protrusive wax record for setting articulators.
Ratzmann A; Mundt T; Schwahn C; Langforth G; Hutzen D; Gedrange T; Kordass B
Int J Comput Dent; 2007 Jul; 10(3):265-84. PubMed ID: 18271499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reproducibility of lateral excursive tooth contact in a semi-adjustable articulator depending on the type of lateral guidance.
Caro AJ; Peraire M; Martinez-Gomis J; Anglada JM; Samsó J
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Mar; 32(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 15707427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Effect of interocclusal records on the condylar path of the articulator].
Angyal J; Bukovinszki K; Keszthelyi G
Fogorv Sz; 2002 Apr; 95(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 11980427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of protrusive interocclusal records to pantographic tracings.
Curtis DA
J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Aug; 62(2):154-6. PubMed ID: 2668509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparative study on the influence of third point of reference on condylar guidance settings in a semi-adjustable articulator with lateral cephalographs: An in-vivo study.
Aldhuwayhi S; Mustafa MZ; Shaikh SA; Mehta S; Mathar MI; Thakare AA; Varadharaju VK; Ayub MS; Shamsudeen SM; A Khan AR
Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 Oct; 24(10):1457-1462. PubMed ID: 34657010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of accuracy of transfer of the maxillary occlusal cant of two articulators using two facebow/semi-adjustable articulator systems: An in vivo study.
Shetty S; Shenoy KK; Sabu A
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 27621543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study.
Goyal MK; Goyal S
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Comparison of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from radiographic and clinical records in dentate patients].
Ñahuincopa-Ríos RJ; Ñahuincopa-López PM; Ángeles-López RG
Rev Cient Odontol (Lima); 2021; 9(2):e060. PubMed ID: 38465274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The importance of the Hanau formula in construction of complete dentures.
Javid NS; Porter MR
J Prosthet Dent; 1975 Oct; 34(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 1100807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
