These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30112381)

  • 1. The Influence of the Smile on the Perceived Facial Type Esthetics.
    Batwa W
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():3562916. PubMed ID: 30112381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptions of brachyfacial, mesofacial and dolichofacial individuals with regard to the buccal corridor in different facial types.
    Pithon MM; Mata KR; Rocha KS; Costa Bdo N; Neves F; Barbosa GC; Coqueiro Rda S
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2014; 22(5):382-9. PubMed ID: 25466472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Smile attractiveness related to buccal corridor space in 3 different facial types: A perception of 3 ethnic groups of Malaysians.
    Nimbalkar S; Oh YY; Mok RY; Tioh JY; Yew KJ; Patil PG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):252-256. PubMed ID: 29551374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of the interproximal contact level on the perception of smile esthetics.
    Rayyan MR
    Dent Med Probl; 2019; 56(3):251-255. PubMed ID: 31577068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual attention during the evaluation of facial attractiveness is influenced by facial angles and smile.
    Kim SH; Hwang S; Hong YJ; Kim JJ; Kim KH; Chung CJ
    Angle Orthod; 2018 May; 88(3):329-337. PubMed ID: 29376732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of gingival display on smile attractiveness assessed by Saudi Arabian laypersons and dental professionals.
    Alaqeely R; AlRowis R; AlSeddiq A; AlShehri F; Aldosari M
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):18718. PubMed ID: 37907618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Esthetic evaluation of dynamic smiles with attention to facial muscle activity.
    Lin AI; Braun T; McNamara JA; Gerstner GE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):819-27. PubMed ID: 23726332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Saudi Children's and Their Parents' Perception of a Digitally Modified Photograph Model of Different Smiles with Different Anterior Teeth Alignments and Dental Appearances.
    Alnasser MA; AlDhelai TA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Jan; 24(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 37189012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subjective and objective evaluation of frontal smile esthetics in patients with facial asymmetry-a comparative cross-sectional study.
    Singh H; Maurya RK; Kapoor P; Sharma P; Srivastava D
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Feb; 20(1):8-20. PubMed ID: 27862935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Smile attractiveness perception regarding buccal corridor size among different facial types.
    Mollabashi V; Abolvardi M; Akhlaghian M; Ghaffari MI
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(3):305-312. PubMed ID: 30328309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the effect of labiolingual inclination and anteroposterior position of maxillary incisors on esthetic profile in three different facial patterns.
    Chirivella P; Singaraju GS; Mandava P; Reddy VK; Neravati JK; George SA
    J Orthod Sci; 2017; 6(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 28197396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Esthetic Assessment of the Effect of Gingival Exposure in the Smile of Patients with Unilateral and Bilateral Maxillary Incisor Agenesis.
    Pinho T; Bellot-Arcís C; Montiel-Company JM; Neves M
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Jul; 24(5):366-72. PubMed ID: 25220205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of the gingival display on posed smile with different facial forms: a comparison of dentists and patients concepts.
    Akhare PJ; Daga A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 23422598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the influence of dental and facial aesthetics in determining overall attractiveness.
    Prasad KN; Sabrish S; Mathew S; Shivamurthy PG; Pattabiraman V; Sagarkar R
    Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):684-697. PubMed ID: 30385289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does the presence of unilateral maxillary incisor edge asymmetries influence the perception of smile esthetics?
    Betrine Ribeiro J; Alecrim Figueiredo B; Wilson Machado A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Jul; 29(4):291-297. PubMed ID: 28556552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Smile microesthetics as perceived by dental professionals and laypersons.
    Alomari SA; Alhaija ESA; AlWahadni AM; Al-Tawachi AK
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Jan; 92(1):101-109. PubMed ID: 34520516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of adults' smile esthetics among orthodontists, clinicians and laypeople.
    Cotrim ER; Vasconcelos Júnior ÁV; Haddad AC; Reis SA
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 25741823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople.
    Pinzan-Vercelino CRM; Costa ACS; Ferreira MC; Bramante FS; Fialho MPN; Gurgel JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):314-321. PubMed ID: 31153615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of the posed smile in overall facial esthetics.
    Havens DC; McNamara JA; Sigler LM; Baccetti T
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Mar; 80(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 19905858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics.
    Roden-Johnson D; Gallerano R; English J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 15775949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.