BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30113542)

  • 1. The economic cost of robotic rehabilitation for adult stroke patients: a systematic review protocol.
    Lo K; Stephenson M; Lockwood C
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1593-1598. PubMed ID: 30113542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The economic cost of robotic rehabilitation for adult stroke patients: a systematic review.
    Lo K; Stephenson M; Lockwood C
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Apr; 17(4):520-547. PubMed ID: 30973526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of robotic assisted rehabilitation for mobility and functional ability in adult stroke patients: a systematic review protocol.
    Lo K; Stephenson M; Lockwood C
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2017 Jan; 15(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 28085725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotics in Lower-Limb Rehabilitation after Stroke.
    Zhang X; Yue Z; Wang J
    Behav Neurol; 2017; 2017():3731802. PubMed ID: 28659660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Arm rehabilitation : Current concepts and therapeutic options].
    Platz T; Schmuck L
    Nervenarzt; 2016 Oct; 87(10):1057-1061. PubMed ID: 27531207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemorrhagic versus ischemic stroke: Who can best benefit from blended conventional physiotherapy with robotic-assisted gait therapy?
    Dierick F; Dehas M; Isambert JL; Injeyan S; Bouché AF; Bleyenheuft Y; Portnoy S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178636. PubMed ID: 28575054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technology-assisted stroke rehabilitation in Mexico: a pilot randomized trial comparing traditional therapy to circuit training in a Robot/technology-assisted therapy gym.
    Bustamante Valles K; Montes S; Madrigal Mde J; Burciaga A; Martínez ME; Johnson MJ
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Sep; 13(1):83. PubMed ID: 27634471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of robot-assisted rehabilitation for the functional recovery of the upper limb in post-stroke patients: a randomized controlled study.
    Taveggia G; Borboni A; Salvi L; Mulé C; Fogliaresi S; Villafañe JH; Casale R
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2016 Dec; 52(6):767-773. PubMed ID: 27406879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of New Technologies on Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Comparison of Armeo Spring to the Kinect System.
    Adomavičienė A; Daunoravičienė K; Kubilius R; Varžaitytė L; Raistenskis J
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Apr; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 30970655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing Effectiveness and Costs in Robot-Mediated Lower Limbs Rehabilitation: A Meta-Analysis and State of the Art.
    Carpino G; Pezzola A; Urbano M; Guglielmelli E
    J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():7492024. PubMed ID: 29973978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An economic analysis of robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke.
    Wagner TH; Lo AC; Peduzzi P; Bravata DM; Huang GD; Krebs HI; Ringer RJ; Federman DG; Richards LG; Haselkorn JK; Wittenberg GF; Volpe BT; Bever CT; Duncan PW; Siroka A; Guarino PD
    Stroke; 2011 Sep; 42(9):2630-2. PubMed ID: 21757677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic devices and brain-machine interfaces for hand rehabilitation post-stroke.
    McConnell AC; Moioli RC; Brasil FL; Vallejo M; Corne DW; Vargas PA; Stokes AA
    J Rehabil Med; 2017 Jun; 49(6):449-460. PubMed ID: 28597018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is Electromechanical and Robot-Assisted Arm Training Effective for Improving Arm Function in People Who Have Had a Stroke?: A Cochrane Review Summary With Commentary.
    Mehrholz J
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Apr; 98(4):339-340. PubMed ID: 30640290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of error-augmentation versus error-reduction paradigms in robotic therapy to enhance upper extremity performance and recovery post-stroke: a systematic review.
    Liu LY; Li Y; Lamontagne A
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Jul; 15(1):65. PubMed ID: 29973250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation with Other Therapeutic Approaches after Stroke: Current Status, Rationale, and Challenges.
    Mazzoleni S; Duret C; Grosmaire AG; Battini E
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():8905637. PubMed ID: 29057269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does assist-as-needed upper limb robotic therapy promote participation in repetitive activity-based motor training in sub-acute stroke patients with severe paresis?
    Grosmaire AG; Duret C
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2017; 41(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 28527224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combining robotic training and inactivation of the healthy hemisphere restores pre-stroke motor patterns in mice.
    Spalletti C; Alia C; Lai S; Panarese A; Conti S; Micera S; Caleo M
    Elife; 2017 Dec; 6():. PubMed ID: 29280732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic therapy provides a stimulus for upper limb motor recovery after stroke that is complementary to and distinct from conventional therapy.
    Brokaw EB; Nichols D; Holley RJ; Lum PS
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 May; 28(4):367-76. PubMed ID: 24297763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How could robotic training and botolinum toxin be combined in chronic post stroke upper limb spasticity? A pilot study.
    Pennati GV; Da Re C; Messineo I; Bonaiuti D
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Aug; 51(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 25358636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Increased Intensity of Physiotherapy on Patient Outcomes After Stroke: An Economic Literature Review and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Chan B
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2015; 15(7):1-43. PubMed ID: 26366241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.