213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30113573)
21. [The use of thresholds of electrically evoked short-latent auditory potentials for the adjustment of the speech processors in the patients undergoing cochlear implantation].
Kuzovkov VE; Gaufman VE; Klyachko DS; Pudov VI
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2016; 81(3):35-38. PubMed ID: 27367347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Visual cortex activation decrement following cochlear implantation in prelingual deafened children.
Liu J; Liang M; Chen Y; Wang Y; Cai Y; Chen S; Chen L; Li X; Qiu Z; Jiang J; Wang J; Zheng Y
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Aug; 99():85-89. PubMed ID: 28688572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Role of Auditory Evoked Potentials in the Context of Cochlear Implant Provision.
Hoth S; Dziemba OC
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e522-e530. PubMed ID: 29135872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prolonged deafness limits auditory system developmental plasticity: evidence from an evoked potentials study in children with cochlear implants.
Ponton CW; Moore JK; Eggermont JJ
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999; 51():13-22. PubMed ID: 10803910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Electrophysiologic and behavioral outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with auditory nerve hypoplasia.
Valero J; Blaser S; Papsin BC; James AL; Gordon KA
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 21750462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cochlear implantation results in patients with Kearns-Sayre syndrome.
Pijl S; Westerberg BD
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):472-5. PubMed ID: 18382375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinically recorded cortical auditory evoked potentials from paediatric cochlear implant users fitted with electrically elicited stapedius reflex thresholds.
Kosaner J; Van Dun B; Yigit O; Gultekin M; Bayguzina S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():100-112. PubMed ID: 29605337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of evoked compound action potential on speech perception in cochlear implant users.
Guedes MC; Weber R; Gomez MV; Neto RV; Peralta CG; Bento RF
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2007; 73(4):439-45. PubMed ID: 17923914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Auditory processing following sequential bilateral cochlear implantation: a pediatric case study using event-related potentials.
Key AP; Porter HL; Bradham T
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Apr; 21(4):225-38. PubMed ID: 20388449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The prognostic value of promontory electric auditory brain stem response in pediatric cochlear implantation.
Nikolopoulos TP; Mason SM; Gibbin KP; O'Donoghue GM
Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 10890732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Of kittens and kids: altered cortical maturation following profound deafness and cochlear implant use.
Ponton CW; Eggermont JJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(6):363-80. PubMed ID: 11847464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Plasticity of tonotopic maps in humans: influence of hearing loss, hearing aids and cochlear implants.
Thai-Van H; Veuillet E; Norena A; Guiraud J; Collet L
Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 130(3):333-7. PubMed ID: 19845491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Changes in electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Deniz B; Kara E; Polat Z; Deniz R; Ataş A
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Feb; 141():110555. PubMed ID: 33333339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Measuring late electrically evoked potentials of the auditory system in cochlear implant patients].
Hoth S
HNO; 1998 Aug; 46(8):739-47. PubMed ID: 9773330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Impact of Patient Factors on Objective Cochlear Implant Verification Using Acoustic Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials.
Bogdanov C; Mulders WHAM; Goulios H; Távora-Vieira D
Audiol Neurootol; 2024; 29(2):96-106. PubMed ID: 37690449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessing temporal modulation sensitivity using electrically evoked auditory steady state responses.
Luke R; Van Deun L; Hofmann M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():37-45. PubMed ID: 25746913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Intra- and postoperative electrophysiological diagnostics].
Wesarg T; Arndt S; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Jung L; Zirn S
HNO; 2017 Apr; 65(4):308-320. PubMed ID: 27435275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
