These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30114221)

  • 1. Family history-based colorectal cancer screening in Australia: A modelling study of the costs, benefits, and harms of different participation scenarios.
    Dillon M; Flander L; Buchanan DD; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Winship IM; Boussioutas A; Giles GG; Hopper JL; Jenkins MA; Ait Ouakrim D
    PLoS Med; 2018 Aug; 15(8):e1002630. PubMed ID: 30114221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term evaluation of benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia: a modelling study.
    Lew JB; St John DJB; Xu XM; Greuter MJE; Caruana M; Cenin DR; He E; Saville M; Grogan P; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
    Lancet Public Health; 2017 Jul; 2(7):e331-e340. PubMed ID: 29253458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program outcomes through increased participation and cost-effective investment.
    Worthington J; Lew JB; Feletto E; Holden CA; Worthley DL; Miller C; Canfell K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0227899. PubMed ID: 32012174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of potential alternatives to iFOBT testing for colorectal cancer screening in Australia.
    Lew JB; St John DJB; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Ee HC; Jenkins MA; He E; Grogan P; Caruana M; Sarfati D; Greuter MJE; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
    Int J Cancer; 2018 Jul; 143(2):269-282. PubMed ID: 29441568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in Australia: an overview of modelling estimates.
    Lew JB; Feletto E; Wade S; Caruana M; Kang YJ; Nickson C; Simms KT; Procopio P; Taylor N; Worthington J; Smith D; Canfell K
    Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revised Australian national guidelines for colorectal cancer screening: family history.
    Jenkins MA; Ait Ouakrim D; Boussioutas A; Hopper JL; Ee HC; Emery JD; Macrae FA; Chetcuti A; Wuellner L; St John DJB
    Med J Aust; 2018 Nov; 209(10):455-460. PubMed ID: 30359558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.
    Phisalprapa P; Supakankunti S; Chaiyakunapruk N
    J Med Econ; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 31560247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
    Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of a population-based screening program for colorectal cancer.
    Pil L; Fobelets M; Putman K; Trybou J; Annemans L
    Eur J Intern Med; 2016 Jul; 32():72-8. PubMed ID: 27157827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of family history-based colorectal cancer screening in Australia.
    Ouakrim DA; Boussioutas A; Lockett T; Hopper JL; Jenkins MA
    BMC Cancer; 2014 Apr; 14():261. PubMed ID: 24735237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preliminary analysis of the cost-effectiveness of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: demonstrating the potential value of comprehensive real world data.
    Tran B; Keating CL; Ananda SS; Kosmider S; Jones I; Croxford M; Field KM; Carter RC; Gibbs P
    Intern Med J; 2012 Jul; 42(7):794-800. PubMed ID: 21883782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors associated with participation in colorectal cancer screening in Australia: Results from the 45 and Up Study cohort.
    He E; Lew JB; Egger S; Banks E; Ward RL; Beral V; Canfell K
    Prev Med; 2018 Jan; 106():185-193. PubMed ID: 29109015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Screening for Colorectal Cancer Based on Polygenic Risk and Family History.
    Cenin DR; Naber SK; de Weerdt AC; Jenkins MA; Preen DB; Ee HC; O'Leary PC; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2020 Jan; 29(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 31748260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-Effectiveness and National Effects of Initiating Colorectal Cancer Screening for Average-Risk Persons at Age 45 Years Instead of 50 Years.
    Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A; Meester RGS; Gupta S; Schoen RE
    Gastroenterology; 2019 Jul; 157(1):137-148. PubMed ID: 30930021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: time to achieve its potential to save lives.
    Ee H; St John J
    Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of the faecal immunochemical test at a range of positivity thresholds compared with the guaiac faecal occult blood test in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.
    Murphy J; Halloran S; Gray A
    BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017186. PubMed ID: 29079605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a mass-media campaign for improving participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia.
    Worthington J; Feletto E; Lew JB; Broun K; Durkin S; Wakefield M; Grogan P; Harper T; Canfell K
    Public Health; 2020 Feb; 179():90-99. PubMed ID: 31760206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrasting Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Under Commercial Insurance vs. Medicare.
    Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A; Brill JV; Levin Z; Bundorf KM
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2018 Dec; 113(12):1836-1847. PubMed ID: 29904156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening With a Blood Test That Meets the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Coverage Decision.
    van den Puttelaar R; Nascimento de Lima P; Knudsen AB; Rutter CM; Kuntz KM; de Jonge L; Escudero FA; Lieberman D; Zauber AG; Hahn AI; Inadomi JM; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    Gastroenterology; 2024 Jul; 167(2):368-377. PubMed ID: 38552671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
    Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.