531 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30114914)
1. Comparing Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms and Metrics for Estrogen Receptor Binding Prediction.
Russo DP; Zorn KM; Clark AM; Zhu H; Ekins S
Mol Pharm; 2018 Oct; 15(10):4361-4370. PubMed ID: 30114914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bioactivity Comparison across Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms Using over 5000 Datasets for Drug Discovery.
Lane TR; Foil DH; Minerali E; Urbina F; Zorn KM; Ekins S
Mol Pharm; 2021 Jan; 18(1):403-415. PubMed ID: 33325717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive modeling of estrogen receptor agonism, antagonism, and binding activities using machine- and deep-learning approaches.
Ciallella HL; Russo DP; Aleksunes LM; Grimm FA; Zhu H
Lab Invest; 2021 Apr; 101(4):490-502. PubMed ID: 32778734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Deep Learning With Multiple Machine Learning Methods and Metrics Using Diverse Drug Discovery Data Sets.
Korotcov A; Tkachenko V; Russo DP; Ekins S
Mol Pharm; 2017 Dec; 14(12):4462-4475. PubMed ID: 29096442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Machine Learning Models Identify New Inhibitors for Human OATP1B1.
Lane TR; Urbina F; Zhang X; Fye M; Gerlach J; Wright SH; Ekins S
Mol Pharm; 2022 Nov; 19(11):4320-4332. PubMed ID: 36269563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine Learning Models for Estrogen Receptor Bioactivity and Endocrine Disruption Prediction.
Zorn KM; Foil DH; Lane TR; Russo DP; Hillwalker W; Feifarek DJ; Jones F; Klaren WD; Brinkman AM; Ekins S
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Oct; 54(19):12202-12213. PubMed ID: 32857505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Binary classification of a large collection of environmental chemicals from estrogen receptor assays by quantitative structure-activity relationship and machine learning methods.
Zang Q; Rotroff DM; Judson RS
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Dec; 53(12):3244-61. PubMed ID: 24279462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of Machine Intelligence in Compound Cell Activity Classification.
Fan Y; Zhang Y; Hua Y; Wang Y; Zhu L; Zhao J; Yang Y; Chen X; Lu S; Lu T; Chen Y; Liu H
Mol Pharm; 2019 Nov; 16(11):4472-4484. PubMed ID: 31580683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficient Prediction of Missed Clinical Appointment Using Machine Learning.
Qureshi Z; Maqbool A; Mirza A; Iqbal MZ; Afzal F; Kanubala DD; Rana T; Umair MY; Wakeel A; Shah SK
Comput Math Methods Med; 2021; 2021():2376391. PubMed ID: 34721656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiple Machine Learning Comparisons of HIV Cell-based and Reverse Transcriptase Data Sets.
Zorn KM; Lane TR; Russo DP; Clark AM; Makarov V; Ekins S
Mol Pharm; 2019 Apr; 16(4):1620-1632. PubMed ID: 30779585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Based on Machine Learning Algorithms.
Wang R; Cai L; Zhang J; He M; Xu J
Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Jan; 59(1):. PubMed ID: 36676795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Machine Learning Based Identification of Microseismic Signals Using Characteristic Parameters.
Peng K; Tang Z; Dong L; Sun D
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Oct; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 34770274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utilizing machine learning algorithms to predict subject genetic mutation class from in silico models of neuronal networks.
Kress GT; Chan F; Garcia CA; Merrifield WS
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Nov; 22(1):290. PubMed ID: 36352381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of Orthosteric and Allosteric Regulations on Cannabinoid Receptors Using Supervised Machine Learning Classifiers.
Bian Y; Jing Y; Wang L; Ma S; Jun JJ; Xie XQ
Mol Pharm; 2019 Jun; 16(6):2605-2615. PubMed ID: 31013097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing and Validating Machine Learning Models for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Drug Discovery.
Lane T; Russo DP; Zorn KM; Clark AM; Korotcov A; Tkachenko V; Reynolds RC; Perryman AL; Freundlich JS; Ekins S
Mol Pharm; 2018 Oct; 15(10):4346-4360. PubMed ID: 29672063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: An empirical comparison of classifiers.
Deist TM; Dankers FJWM; Valdes G; Wijsman R; Hsu IC; Oberije C; Lustberg T; van Soest J; Hoebers F; Jochems A; El Naqa I; Wee L; Morin O; Raleigh DR; Bots W; Kaanders JH; Belderbos J; Kwint M; Solberg T; Monshouwer R; Bussink J; Dekker A; Lambin P
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3449-3459. PubMed ID: 29763967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI).
Minerali E; Foil DH; Zorn KM; Lane TR; Ekins S
Mol Pharm; 2020 Jul; 17(7):2628-2637. PubMed ID: 32422053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of machine learning in the diagnosis of vestibular disease.
Anh DT; Takakura H; Asai M; Ueda N; Shojaku H
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):20805. PubMed ID: 36460741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Prediction of Hospitalized Patients with Schizophrenia.
Góngora Alonso S; Marques G; Agarwal D; De la Torre Díez I; Franco-Martín M
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Which supervised machine learning algorithm can best predict achievement of minimum clinically important difference in neck pain after surgery in patients with cervical myelopathy? A QOD study.
Park C; Mummaneni PV; Gottfried ON; Shaffrey CI; Tang AJ; Bisson EF; Asher AL; Coric D; Potts EA; Foley KT; Wang MY; Fu KM; Virk MS; Knightly JJ; Meyer S; Park P; Upadhyaya C; Shaffrey ME; Buchholz AL; Tumialán LM; Turner JD; Sherrod BA; Agarwal N; Chou D; Haid RW; Bydon M; Chan AK
Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jun; 54(6):E5. PubMed ID: 37283449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
