These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30115437)
41. Dynamic translabial ultrasound versus echodefecography combined with the endovaginal approach to assess pelvic floor dysfunctions: How effective are these techniques? Murad-Regadas SM; Karbage SA; Bezerra LS; Regadas FSP; da Silva Vilarinho A; Borges LB; Regadas Filho FSP; Veras LB Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Jul; 21(7):555-565. PubMed ID: 28674949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Use of dynamic 3-dimensional transvaginal and transrectal ultrasonography to assess posterior pelvic floor dysfunction related to obstructed defecation. Murad-Regadas SM; Regadas Filho FS; Regadas FS; Rodrigues LV; de J R Pereira J; da S Fernandes GO; Dealcanfreitas ID; Mendonca Filho JJ Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Feb; 57(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 24401886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Influence of rectal gel volume on defecation during dynamic pelvic floor magnetic resonance imaging. Khatri G; Bailey AA; Bacsu C; Christie AL; Kumar N; Pedrosa I; Zimmern P Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(6):1027-31. PubMed ID: 26253772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Dynamic MR defecography of the posterior compartment: Indications, techniques and MRI features. Mortele KJ; Fairhurst J Eur J Radiol; 2007 Mar; 61(3):462-72. PubMed ID: 17145152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Consensus Definitions and Interpretation Templates for Fluoroscopic Imaging of Defecatory Pelvic Floor Disorders : Proceedings of the Consensus Meeting of the Pelvic Floor Consortium of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the Society of Abdominal Radiology, the International Continence Society, the American Urogynecologic Society, the International Urogynecological Association, and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons. Paquette I; Rosman D; Sayed RE; Hull T; Kocjancic E; Quiroz L; Palmer S; Shobeiri A; Weinstein M; Khatri G; Bordeianou L; Tech Coloproctol; 2021 Jan; 25(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 33394215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Female Pelvic Floor: Anatomy Overview, Indications, and Imaging Protocols. El Sayed RF Radiol Clin North Am; 2020 Mar; 58(2):291-303. PubMed ID: 32044008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Imaging studies of the pelvic floor. Weidner AC; Low VH Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1998 Dec; 25(4):825-48, vii. PubMed ID: 9921559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Clarifying the technique of four-contrast defecography. Saclarides TJ; Brubaker LT; Altringer WE; Smith CS; Dominguez JM Dis Colon Rectum; 1996 Jul; 39(7):826. PubMed ID: 8674379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Defecography: a practical approach. Faccioli N; Comai A; Mainardi P; Perandini S; Moore F; Pozzi-Mucelli R Diagn Interv Radiol; 2010 Sep; 16(3):209-16. PubMed ID: 20108205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Functional disorders of the ano-rectal compartment of the pelvic floor: clinical and diagnostic value of dynamic MRI. Maccioni F Abdom Imaging; 2013 Oct; 38(5):930-51. PubMed ID: 23090206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Defecography in patients with anorectal disorders: a study in 27 cases. Boonjunwetwat D; Sungtong P; Rojanasakul A J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Aug; 84(8):1097-102. PubMed ID: 11758842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The role of tridimensional dynamic ultrasound for pelvic floor evaluation. de la Portilla F; Rubio Manzanares Dorado M; Pino Díaz V; Vazquez Monchul JM; Palacios C; Díaz Pavón JM; Sánchez Gil JM; García Cabrera AM Cir Esp; 2015 Oct; 93(8):530-5. PubMed ID: 25659535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The usefulness of MR defecography in the evaluation of pelvic floor dysfunction: our experience using 3T MRI. Al-Najar MS; Ghanem AF; AlRyalat SAS; Al-Ryalat NT; Alhajahjeh SO Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Sep; 42(9):2219-2224. PubMed ID: 28386692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Multimodality imaging of pelvic floor anatomy. Flusberg M; Kobi M; Bahrami S; Glanc P; Palmer S; Chernyak V; Kanmaniraja D; El Sayed RF Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Apr; 46(4):1302-1311. PubMed ID: 31555847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Dynamic MR defecography of the posterior compartment: Comparison with conventional X-ray defecography. Poncelet E; Rock A; Quinton JF; Cosson M; Ramdane N; Nicolas L; Feldmann A; Salleron J Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Apr; 98(4):327-332. PubMed ID: 28089181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of dynamic transperineal ultrasound and defecography for the evaluation of pelvic floor disorders. Beer-Gabel M; Carter D Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 30(6):835-41. PubMed ID: 25820786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Role of conventional radiology and MRi defecography of pelvic floor hernias. Reginelli A; Di Grezia G; Gatta G; Iacobellis F; Rossi C; Giganti M; Coppolino F; Brunese L BMC Surg; 2013; 13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S53. PubMed ID: 24267789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Rectal intussusception: can high resolution three-dimensional ano-rectal manometry compete with conventional defecography? Benezech A; Cappiello M; Baumstarck K; Grimaud JC; Bouvier M; Vitton V Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2017 Apr; 29(4):. PubMed ID: 27891706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]