230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30115610)
1. Developing Embedded Taxonomy and Mining Patients' Interests From Web-Based Physician Reviews: Mixed-Methods Approach.
Li J; Liu M; Li X; Liu X; Liu J
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Aug; 20(8):e254. PubMed ID: 30115610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Voice of Chinese Health Consumers: A Text Mining Approach to Web-Based Physician Reviews.
Hao H; Zhang K
J Med Internet Res; 2016 May; 18(5):e108. PubMed ID: 27165558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A tale of two countries: International comparison of online doctor reviews between China and the United States.
Hao H; Zhang K; Wang W; Gao G
Int J Med Inform; 2017 Mar; 99():37-44. PubMed ID: 28118920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Data Mining of the Reviews from Online Private Doctors.
Liu J; Zhang W; Jiang X; Zhou Y
Telemed J E Health; 2020 Sep; 26(9):1157-1166. PubMed ID: 31674890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Topic evolution and sentiment comparison of user reviews on an online medical platform in response to COVID-19: taking review data of Haodf.com as an example.
Li C; Li S; Yang J; Wang J; Lv Y
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1088119. PubMed ID: 37333543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The development of online doctor reviews in China: an analysis of the largest online doctor review website in China.
Hao H
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jun; 17(6):e134. PubMed ID: 26032933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Developing the FARSEEING Taxonomy of Technologies: Classification and description of technology use (including ICT) in falls prevention studies.
Boulton E; Hawley-Hague H; Vereijken B; Clifford A; Guldemond N; Pfeiffer K; Hall A; Chesani F; Mellone S; Bourke A; Todd C
J Biomed Inform; 2016 Jun; 61():132-40. PubMed ID: 27018213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What Do Patients Complain About Online: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy Framework Based on Patient Centeredness.
Liu J; Hou S; Evans R; Xia C; Xia W; Ma J
J Med Internet Res; 2019 Aug; 21(8):e14634. PubMed ID: 31392961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Impact of Web-Based Ratings on Patient Choice of a Primary Care Physician Versus a Specialist: Randomized Controlled Experiment.
Li S; Hubner A
J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jun; 21(6):e11188. PubMed ID: 31254337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Impact of Ambivalent Attitudes on the Helpfulness of Web-Based Reviews: Secondary Analysis of Data From a Large Physician Review Website.
Dong W; Liu Y; Zhu Z; Cao X
J Med Internet Res; 2023 May; 25():e38306. PubMed ID: 37247213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What is a medical decision? A taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters: a qualitative study.
Ofstad EH; Frich JC; Schei E; Frankel RM; Gulbrandsen P
BMJ Open; 2016 Feb; 6(2):e010098. PubMed ID: 26868946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physician Gender, Patient Risk, and Web-Based Reviews: Longitudinal Study of the Relationship Between Physicians' Gender and Their Web-Based Reviews.
Saifee DH; Hudnall M; Raja U
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Apr; 24(4):e31659. PubMed ID: 35394435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Insights into the impact of online physician reviews on patients' decision making: randomized experiment.
Grabner-Kräuter S; Waiguny MK
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Apr; 17(4):e93. PubMed ID: 25862516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.
Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gender, Soft Skills, and Patient Experience in Online Physician Reviews: A Large-Scale Text Analysis.
Dunivin Z; Zadunayski L; Baskota U; Siek K; Mankoff J
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jul; 22(7):e14455. PubMed ID: 32729844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the Heterogeneity of Complaints Related to Tinnitus and Hyperacusis from an Unsupervised Machine Learning Approach: An Exploratory Study.
Palacios G; Noreña A; Londero A
Audiol Neurootol; 2020; 25(4):174-189. PubMed ID: 32062654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extension to 'combined SNA and LDA methods to understand adverse medical events': Doctor and nurse perspectives.
Zhu L; Reychav I; McHaney R; Broda A; Tal Y; Manor O
Int J Risk Saf Med; 2020; 31(4):221-246. PubMed ID: 32538872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methods to Evaluate the Effects of Internet-Based Digital Health Interventions for Citizens: Systematic Review of Reviews.
Zanaboni P; Ngangue P; Mbemba GIC; Schopf TR; Bergmo TS; Gagnon MP
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jun; 20(6):e10202. PubMed ID: 29880470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effects of Website Traits and Medical Skepticism on Patients' Willingness to Follow Web-Based Medical Advice: Web-Based Experiment.
Claggett J; Kitchens B; Paino M; Beisecker Levin K
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Feb; 24(2):e29275. PubMed ID: 35179506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Web content topic modeling using LDA and HTML tags.
Altarturi HHM; Saadoon M; Anuar NB
PeerJ Comput Sci; 2023; 9():e1459. PubMed ID: 37547394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
