These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30116844)

  • 41. MRI and CT of sacrocolpopexy.
    Rousset P; Deval B; Chaillot PF; Amara N; Buy JN; Hoeffel C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Apr; 200(4):W383-94. PubMed ID: 23521482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Laparoscopic Repair of Enterocervical Fistula After Mesh Erosion Into the Sigmoid Colon and Cervix After Robotic Supracervical Hysterectomy and Sacrocervicopexy.
    Mickelson L; Miklos JR; Moore RD
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):e3-5. PubMed ID: 26516811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal apical prolapse: evidence-based surgery.
    Parkes IL; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):546-57. PubMed ID: 24462593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Surgical techniques for advanced stage pelvic organ prolapse.
    Brown DN; Strauchon C; Gonzalez H; Gruber D
    Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Feb; 68(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 26448444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience.
    Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 21818575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. One-year functional and anatomic outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal extraperitoneal colpopexy with mesh.
    Jambusaria LH; Murphy M; Lucente VR
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 25185594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Lymphatic injury at sacrocolpopexy: an unusual complication.
    Suen MW; Geoffrion R
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Apr; 36(4):339-342. PubMed ID: 24798672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
    Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
    Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: temporary phenomenon or a new consolidated technique.
    Moreno Sierra J; Ortiz Oshiro E; Chavez Roa C; Silmi Moyano A
    Urol Int; 2012; 88(2):245-6. PubMed ID: 22236660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Long-term outcomes and predictors of failure after surgery for stage IV apical pelvic organ prolapse.
    Linder BJ; El-Nashar SA; Mukwege AA; Weaver AL; McGree ME; Rhodes DJ; Gebhart JB; Klingele CJ; Occhino JA; Trabuco EC
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):803-810. PubMed ID: 28921036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
    Rosenblum N
    Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
    Costantini E; Mearini L; Lazzeri M; Bini V; Nunzi E; di Biase M; Porena M
    J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 26780167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sexual function after robot-assisted prolapse surgery: a prospective study.
    van Zanten F; Brem C; Lenters E; Broeders IAMJ; Schraffordt Koops SE
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):905-912. PubMed ID: 29687171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
    De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Spondylodiscitis after sacrocolpopexy.
    Brito LG; Giraudet G; Lucot JP; Cosson M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Apr; 187():72. PubMed ID: 25758558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a case series of 31 patients by a single surgeon with a long term follow-up.
    Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Villa M; Sportelli C; Pezzotta MG
    Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Feb; 69(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 28116884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Early safety and efficacy outcomes of a novel technique of sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of apical prolapse.
    Rajshekhar S; Mukhopadhyay S; Morris E
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Nov; 135(2):182-186. PubMed ID: 27498595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Trends in Mesh Use for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair From the Medicare Database.
    Wang LC; Al Hussein Al Awamlh B; Hu JC; Laudano MA; Davison WL; Schulster ML; Zhao F; Chughtai B; Lee RK
    Urology; 2015 Nov; 86(5):885-91. PubMed ID: 26344153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    De Gouveia De Sa M; Claydon LS; Whitlow B; Dolcet Artahona MA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Mar; 27(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 26249235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Ploumidis A; Spinoit AF; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Gan M; Ficarra V; Volpe A; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.