179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30117033)
1. Comparison of ability of pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in prone and supine position: an observational study.
Ali A; Abdullah T; Sabanci PA; Dogan L; Orhan-Sungur M; Akinci IO
J Clin Monit Comput; 2019 Aug; 33(4):573-580. PubMed ID: 30117033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ability of mini-fluid challenge to predict fluid responsiveness in obese patients undergoing surgery in the prone position.
Ali A; Dorman Y; Abdullah T; Yasa C; Orhan-Sungur M; Akinci IO; Ergin-Ozcan P
Minerva Anestesiol; 2019 Sep; 85(9):981-988. PubMed ID: 30994311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation, and pleth variability index in predicting fluid responsiveness during different positive end expiratory pressure in prone position.
Chen Y; Fu Q; Mi WD
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2015 Apr; 37(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 25936706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of pulse pressure variation and corrected flow time as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients in the prone position.
Yang SY; Shim JK; Song Y; Seo SJ; Kwak YL
Br J Anaesth; 2013 May; 110(5):713-20. PubMed ID: 23274783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A challenge with 5 cmH2O of positive end-expiratory pressure predicts fluid responsiveness in neurosurgery patients with protective ventilation: an observational study.
Ali A; Aygun E; Abdullah T; Bolsoy-Deveci S; Orhan-Sungur M; Canbaz M; Ozkan Akinci I
Minerva Anestesiol; 2019 Nov; 85(11):1184-1192. PubMed ID: 31213047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Respiratory variation in the internal jugular vein does not predict fluid responsiveness in the prone position during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a prospective cohort study.
Wu M; Dai Z; Liang Y; Liu X; Zheng X; Zhang W; Bo J
BMC Anesthesiol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):360. PubMed ID: 37932674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abilities of pulse pressure variations and stroke volume variations to predict fluid responsiveness in prone position during scoliosis surgery.
Biais M; Bernard O; Ha JC; Degryse C; Sztark F
Br J Anaesth; 2010 Apr; 104(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 20190260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation.
Jun IJ; Chung MH; Kim JE; Lee HS; Son JM; Choi EM
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(12):2589-2598. PubMed ID: 34104090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness in Prone Neurosurgical Patients Undergoing Protective Ventilation: Role of Dynamic Indices, Tidal Volume Challenge, and End-Expiratory Occlusion Test.
Messina A; Montagnini C; Cammarota G; Giuliani F; Muratore L; Baggiani M; Bennett V; Della Corte F; Navalesi P; Cecconi M
Anesth Analg; 2020 Mar; 130(3):752-761. PubMed ID: 31651455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility of stroke volume variation measured using non-invasive bioreactance as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in the prone position.
Min JJ; Lee JH; Hong KY; Choi SJ
J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Apr; 31(2):397-405. PubMed ID: 26964992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor.
Stens J; Oeben J; Van Dusseldorp AA; Boer C
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26318314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Change in cardiac output during Trendelenburg maneuver is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the prone position under protective ventilation.
Yonis H; Bitker L; Aublanc M; Perinel Ragey S; Riad Z; Lissonde F; Louf-Durier A; Debord S; Gobert F; Tapponnier R; Guérin C; Richard JC
Crit Care; 2017 Dec; 21(1):295. PubMed ID: 29208025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prone position affects stroke volume variation performance in predicting fluid responsiveness in neurosurgical patients.
Berger K; Francony G; Bouzat P; Halle C; Genty C; Oddoux M; Gay E; Albaladejo P; Payen JF
Minerva Anestesiol; 2015 Jun; 81(6):628-35. PubMed ID: 25263024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients experiencing intra-abdominal hypertension.
Liu X; Fu Q; Mi W; Liu H; Zhang H; Wang P
Biosci Trends; 2013 Apr; 7(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 23612080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pulse pressure variation and pleth variability index as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position.
Kim DH; Shin S; Kim JY; Kim SH; Jo M; Choi YS
Ther Clin Risk Manag; 2018; 14():1175-1183. PubMed ID: 30013353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic Arterial Elastance as a Predictor of Supine-to-Prone Hypotension (SuProne Study): An Observational Study.
Ahn JH; Park J; Shim JG; Lee SH; Ryu KH; Jeong T; Cho EA
Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Nov; 59(12):. PubMed ID: 38138152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Tidal volume challenge to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room: An observational study.
Messina A; Montagnini C; Cammarota G; De Rosa S; Giuliani F; Muratore L; Della Corte F; Navalesi P; Cecconi M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 36(8):583-591. PubMed ID: 31021879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The value of passive leg raising test in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction].
Xiang S; Muyun H; Juan C; Bin O; Minying C; Changjie C; Jianfeng W; Zimeng L; Yongjun L; Shunwei H; Lifen L; Xiangdong G
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Sep; 27(9):729-34. PubMed ID: 26955698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tidal volume challenge to predict preload responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under prone position.
Shi R; Ayed S; Moretto F; Azzolina D; De Vita N; Gavelli F; Carelli S; Pavot A; Lai C; Monnet X; Teboul JL
Crit Care; 2022 Jul; 26(1):219. PubMed ID: 35850771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
