These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30117716)
1. An evidence-based review of split-thickness skin graft donor site dressings. Brown JE; Holloway SL Int Wound J; 2018 Dec; 15(6):1000-1009. PubMed ID: 30117716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treating skin graft donor sites: a comparative study between remnant skin use and polyurethane foam. Ki SH; Ma SH; Choi JH; Sim SH; Kim HM J Wound Care; 2019 Jul; 28(7):469-477. PubMed ID: 31295096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of moist wound-healing dressings in the management of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a systematic review. Wiechula R Int J Nurs Pract; 2003 Apr; 9(2):S9-17. PubMed ID: 12694482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of five different dressing materials on split-thickness skin graft donor site and full-thickness cutaneous wounds: an experimental study. Uraloğlu M; Livaoğlu M; Agdoğan Ö; Mungan S; Alhan E; Karaçal N Int Wound J; 2014 Feb; 11(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 22943661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of modern dressings in managing split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a single-centre randomised controlled trial. Kazanavičius M; Cepas A; Kolaityte V; Simoliuniene R; Rimdeika R J Wound Care; 2017 Jun; 26(6):281-291. PubMed ID: 28598760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of a novel chitosan-based dressing on split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a pilot study. Varon DE; Smith JD; Bharadia DR; Shafique N; Sakthivel D; Halvorson EG; Nuutila K; Sinha I J Wound Care; 2018 Jul; 27(Sup7):S12-S18. PubMed ID: 30008255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison between DACC with chlorhexidine acetate-soaked paraffin gauze and foam dressing for skin graft donor sites. Lee JW; Park SH; Suh IS; Jeong HS J Wound Care; 2018 Jan; 27(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 29333932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of Dressing Materials on Donor Site Morbidity: A Comparative Study at a Tertiary Hospital in Kenya. Macharia M; Nangole FW Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jul; 83(1):22-25. PubMed ID: 31194707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Associated use of silicone-vitamin E gauzes and α-tocopherol acetate oil in healing of skin graft donor sites. Stanizzi A; Bottoni M; Tartaglione C; Bolletta E; Benedetto GD Int Wound J; 2017 Oct; 14(5):813-817. PubMed ID: 28111908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective, randomised study of a novel transforming methacrylate dressing compared with a silver-containing sodium carboxymethylcellulose dressing on partial-thickness skin graft donor sites in burn patients. Assadian O; Arnoldo B; Purdue G; Burris A; Skrinjar E; Duschek N; Leaper DJ Int Wound J; 2015 Jun; 12(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 23919667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Split-thickness skin graft donor site management. A randomized prospective trial comparing a hydrophilic polyurethane absorbent foam dressing with a petrolatum gauze dressing. Weber RS; Hankins P; Limitone E; Callender D; Frankenthaler RM; Wolf P; Goepfert H Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Oct; 121(10):1145-9. PubMed ID: 7546582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CICAFAST: comparison of a biological dressing composed of fetal fibroblasts and keratinocytes on a split-thickness skin graft donor site versus a traditional dressing: a randomized controlled trial. Poinas A; Perrot P; Lorant J; Nerrière O; Nguyen JM; Saiagh S; Frenard C; Leduc A; Malard O; Espitalier F; Duteille F; Chiffoleau A; Vrignaud F; Khammari A; Dréno B Trials; 2019 Oct; 20(1):612. PubMed ID: 31661012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Negative-pressure wound dressings to secure split-thickness skin grafts in the perineum. Lee KT; Pyon JK; Lim SY; Mun GH; Oh KS; Bang SI Int Wound J; 2014 Apr; 11(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 22958590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of skin graft donor site management using oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC)/collagen/silver-ORC with absorptive silicone adhesive border and transparent film dressing vs semi-occlusive dressings. Chowdhry SA Int Wound J; 2023 Apr; 20(4):1112-1117. PubMed ID: 36151766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The ideal split-thickness skin graft donor-site dressing: a clinical comparative trial of a modified polyurethane dressing and aquacel. Dornseifer U; Lonic D; Gerstung TI; Herter F; Fichter AM; Holm C; Schuster T; Ninkovic M Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Oct; 128(4):918-924. PubMed ID: 21681125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective clinical trial comparing Biobrane(®) Dressilk(®) and PolyMem(®) dressings on partial-thickness skin graft donor sites. Schulz A; Depner C; Lefering R; Kricheldorff J; Kästner S; Fuchs PC; Demir E Burns; 2016 Mar; 42(2):345-55. PubMed ID: 25720659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of an oxygen-diffusion dressing for accelerated healing of donor-site wounds. Lairet KF; Baer D; Leas ML; Renz EM; Cancio LC J Burn Care Res; 2014; 35(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 23877142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Single Centre, Randomized Control Trial Of Donor Site Wound Dressings After Split-Thickness Skin Grafting. Ismail S; Ali Khan FA; Gulzar S; Sami W; Zulfiqar B; Kumar S; Naz E J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2023; 35(4):645-649. PubMed ID: 38406953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]