204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30117716)
1. An evidence-based review of split-thickness skin graft donor site dressings.
Brown JE; Holloway SL
Int Wound J; 2018 Dec; 15(6):1000-1009. PubMed ID: 30117716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treating skin graft donor sites: a comparative study between remnant skin use and polyurethane foam.
Ki SH; Ma SH; Choi JH; Sim SH; Kim HM
J Wound Care; 2019 Jul; 28(7):469-477. PubMed ID: 31295096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of moist wound-healing dressings in the management of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a systematic review.
Wiechula R
Int J Nurs Pract; 2003 Apr; 9(2):S9-17. PubMed ID: 12694482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of five different dressing materials on split-thickness skin graft donor site and full-thickness cutaneous wounds: an experimental study.
Uraloğlu M; Livaoğlu M; Agdoğan Ö; Mungan S; Alhan E; Karaçal N
Int Wound J; 2014 Feb; 11(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 22943661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of modern dressings in managing split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a single-centre randomised controlled trial.
Kazanavičius M; Cepas A; Kolaityte V; Simoliuniene R; Rimdeika R
J Wound Care; 2017 Jun; 26(6):281-291. PubMed ID: 28598760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of a novel chitosan-based dressing on split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a pilot study.
Varon DE; Smith JD; Bharadia DR; Shafique N; Sakthivel D; Halvorson EG; Nuutila K; Sinha I
J Wound Care; 2018 Jul; 27(Sup7):S12-S18. PubMed ID: 30008255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hydrogel dressings for donor sites of split-thickness skin grafts.
Younis AS; Abdelmonem IM; Gadullah M; Alnaggar HE; Mohamed YR; Villanueva G; Thompson J; Areia C; Nabhan AF
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Aug; 8(8):CD013570. PubMed ID: 37584338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison between DACC with chlorhexidine acetate-soaked paraffin gauze and foam dressing for skin graft donor sites.
Lee JW; Park SH; Suh IS; Jeong HS
J Wound Care; 2018 Jan; 27(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 29333932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of Dressing Materials on Donor Site Morbidity: A Comparative Study at a Tertiary Hospital in Kenya.
Macharia M; Nangole FW
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jul; 83(1):22-25. PubMed ID: 31194707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Associated use of silicone-vitamin E gauzes and α-tocopherol acetate oil in healing of skin graft donor sites.
Stanizzi A; Bottoni M; Tartaglione C; Bolletta E; Benedetto GD
Int Wound J; 2017 Oct; 14(5):813-817. PubMed ID: 28111908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective, randomised study of a novel transforming methacrylate dressing compared with a silver-containing sodium carboxymethylcellulose dressing on partial-thickness skin graft donor sites in burn patients.
Assadian O; Arnoldo B; Purdue G; Burris A; Skrinjar E; Duschek N; Leaper DJ
Int Wound J; 2015 Jun; 12(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 23919667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Split-thickness skin graft donor site management. A randomized prospective trial comparing a hydrophilic polyurethane absorbent foam dressing with a petrolatum gauze dressing.
Weber RS; Hankins P; Limitone E; Callender D; Frankenthaler RM; Wolf P; Goepfert H
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Oct; 121(10):1145-9. PubMed ID: 7546582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CICAFAST: comparison of a biological dressing composed of fetal fibroblasts and keratinocytes on a split-thickness skin graft donor site versus a traditional dressing: a randomized controlled trial.
Poinas A; Perrot P; Lorant J; Nerrière O; Nguyen JM; Saiagh S; Frenard C; Leduc A; Malard O; Espitalier F; Duteille F; Chiffoleau A; Vrignaud F; Khammari A; Dréno B
Trials; 2019 Oct; 20(1):612. PubMed ID: 31661012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Negative-pressure wound dressings to secure split-thickness skin grafts in the perineum.
Lee KT; Pyon JK; Lim SY; Mun GH; Oh KS; Bang SI
Int Wound J; 2014 Apr; 11(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 22958590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of skin graft donor site management using oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC)/collagen/silver-ORC with absorptive silicone adhesive border and transparent film dressing vs semi-occlusive dressings.
Chowdhry SA
Int Wound J; 2023 Apr; 20(4):1112-1117. PubMed ID: 36151766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The ideal split-thickness skin graft donor-site dressing: a clinical comparative trial of a modified polyurethane dressing and aquacel.
Dornseifer U; Lonic D; Gerstung TI; Herter F; Fichter AM; Holm C; Schuster T; Ninkovic M
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Oct; 128(4):918-924. PubMed ID: 21681125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective clinical trial comparing Biobrane(®) Dressilk(®) and PolyMem(®) dressings on partial-thickness skin graft donor sites.
Schulz A; Depner C; Lefering R; Kricheldorff J; Kästner S; Fuchs PC; Demir E
Burns; 2016 Mar; 42(2):345-55. PubMed ID: 25720659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of an oxygen-diffusion dressing for accelerated healing of donor-site wounds.
Lairet KF; Baer D; Leas ML; Renz EM; Cancio LC
J Burn Care Res; 2014; 35(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 23877142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Management of superficial to partial-thickness wounds.
Beam JW
J Athl Train; 2007; 42(3):422-4. PubMed ID: 18059999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Single Centre, Randomized Control Trial Of Donor Site Wound Dressings After Split-Thickness Skin Grafting.
Ismail S; Ali Khan FA; Gulzar S; Sami W; Zulfiqar B; Kumar S; Naz E
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2023; 35(4):645-649. PubMed ID: 38406953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
